<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: using the histogram to determine exposure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/</link>
	<description>photography by Neil van Niekerk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:30:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-5311</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-5311</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Alfredo, I do believe it has to do with the limitations of the way that D-SLRs are designed, based on the reflex mirror.  But I am sure it&#039;s a next logical step for pro D-SLRs to have this feature.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Alfredo, I do believe it has to do with the limitations of the way that D-SLRs are designed, based on the reflex mirror.  But I am sure it&#8217;s a next logical step for pro D-SLRs to have this feature.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfredo Medina</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-5309</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfredo Medina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-5309</guid>
		<description>Hi Neil,

Today I had on my hands a camera Canon Powershot SX-10 IS and I could see that this has a live histogram. For me it was very interesting to see the histogram before the shot and I wonder why this type of histogram is not implemented in the pro cameras and semi-pros?

Best regards,

Alfredo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Neil,</p>
<p>Today I had on my hands a camera Canon Powershot SX-10 IS and I could see that this has a live histogram. For me it was very interesting to see the histogram before the shot and I wonder why this type of histogram is not implemented in the pro cameras and semi-pros?</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Alfredo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-301</guid>
		<description>[1.7] IS [1 2/3] stops. same thing, different notation.

1/3 = 0.3
2/3 = 0.7
3/3 [1] = 1

Clear? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[1.7] IS [1 2/3] stops. same thing, different notation.</p>
<p>1/3 = 0.3<br />
2/3 = 0.7<br />
3/3 [1] = 1</p>
<p>Clear? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lydia</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Lydia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-300</guid>
		<description>Lance, yes - it makes sense that 5 clicks = 1 2/3 stops, but how does that amount to 1.7 stops? Thanks for explaining nevertheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lance, yes &#8211; it makes sense that 5 clicks = 1 2/3 stops, but how does that amount to 1.7 stops? Thanks for explaining nevertheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-299</guid>
		<description>Lydia,

I believe that would be 5 clicks, total.

The meter center is 0. each full stop is generally represented by a vertical line, as such: &#124; and each 1/3rd stop by a dot. so..

- &lt;&#124;..&#124;..0..&#124;..&#124;&gt; +

your 5th click over would then be 1.7 (or 1 2/3rd) stops.

Anybody is welcome to correct me if i forgot something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lydia,</p>
<p>I believe that would be 5 clicks, total.</p>
<p>The meter center is 0. each full stop is generally represented by a vertical line, as such: | and each 1/3rd stop by a dot. so..</p>
<p>- < |..|..0..|..|> +</p>
<p>your 5th click over would then be 1.7 (or 1 2/3rd) stops.</p>
<p>Anybody is welcome to correct me if i forgot something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lydia</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Lydia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Neil
Thanks, but when you refer to 1.7 stops - how many clicks is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil<br />
Thanks, but when you refer to 1.7 stops &#8211; how many clicks is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-297</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Lydia ... one click = 1/3d stop

Count the clicks on your aperture dial or on your shutter speed dial (or both), or even your ISO setting.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Lydia &#8230; one click = 1/3d stop</p>
<p>Count the clicks on your aperture dial or on your shutter speed dial (or both), or even your ISO setting.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lydia</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Lydia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-296</guid>
		<description>Neil
&quot;There is another way to approach this, and that is to spot-meter off only the relevant white area, and place it around 1.3 stops over the zero mark on your camera’s meter display. You don’t want to zero the meter reading then, since we don’t want the white to appear as grey. We want the white to appear as white .. and that will be around 1.3 stops to 1.7 stops over the zero mark.&quot;

Please tell me how many CLICKS over the 0 mark is 1.3 / 1.7 stops - I&#039;m on 1/3 increments.

Many thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil<br />
&#8220;There is another way to approach this, and that is to spot-meter off only the relevant white area, and place it around 1.3 stops over the zero mark on your camera’s meter display. You don’t want to zero the meter reading then, since we don’t want the white to appear as grey. We want the white to appear as white .. and that will be around 1.3 stops to 1.7 stops over the zero mark.&#8221;</p>
<p>Please tell me how many CLICKS over the 0 mark is 1.3 / 1.7 stops &#8211; I&#8217;m on 1/3 increments.</p>
<p>Many thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: winston</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>winston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-295</guid>
		<description>nice run up on techniques and ideas for strobes. Always good to read other photogs ideas and attack behind the cameras</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice run up on techniques and ideas for strobes. Always good to read other photogs ideas and attack behind the cameras</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-294</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Alwin, read my July 25 comment to Stephen about this topic.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Alwin, read my July 25 comment to Stephen about this topic.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
