<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: using the histogram to determine exposure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure</link>
	<description>photography by Neil van Niekerk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:35:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-44553</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-44553</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Aditya ... you don&#039;t &quot;over-expose&quot; the white dress. You expose correctly ... by shifting the exposure value up. In the viewfinder, you&#039;d look at the exposure meter, and take it to around 1.3 stops up from zero .. &lt;strong&gt;the brightest relevant tone, ie, white&lt;/strong&gt;.  

Not over-exposure, but correct exposure. 

Here is another article that goes over the topic:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/10/20/exposure-metering-bride-and-brides-dress/&quot;&gt;exposure metering for the bride&#039;s white dress&lt;/a&gt;

You can&#039;t do the same kind of judgement for darker skin tones when you use the histogram. Not with the same accuracy you do for white, anyway.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Aditya &#8230; you don&#8217;t &#8220;over-expose&#8221; the white dress. You expose correctly &#8230; by shifting the exposure value up. In the viewfinder, you&#8217;d look at the exposure meter, and take it to around 1.3 stops up from zero .. <strong>the brightest relevant tone, ie, white</strong>.  </p>
<p>Not over-exposure, but correct exposure. </p>
<p>Here is another article that goes over the topic:<br />
<a href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/10/20/exposure-metering-bride-and-brides-dress/">exposure metering for the bride&#8217;s white dress</a></p>
<p>You can&#8217;t do the same kind of judgement for darker skin tones when you use the histogram. Not with the same accuracy you do for white, anyway.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aditya</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-44505</link>
		<dc:creator>aditya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-44505</guid>
		<description>hi,
As we meter white dress for a bride and adjust it on histogram as to how much needs to be overexposed . 
I have one question as how we adjust if the skin tone of the person is at extreme levels( too dark and very fair).
regards
Aditya</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,<br />
As we meter white dress for a bride and adjust it on histogram as to how much needs to be overexposed .<br />
I have one question as how we adjust if the skin tone of the person is at extreme levels( too dark and very fair).<br />
regards<br />
Aditya</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-37908</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 05:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-37908</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much, Neil!  I am working through your on-camera flash book and finding it extremely informative if a bit of a steep learning curve for someone at my level.

I&#039;ve suddenly been asked to take some shots of a wedding at New York&#039;s City Hall in just a few days time, as a favor for a couple of friends.  They&#039;re not expecting pro-quality work by any means, but I aim to do my best for them, so I am trying to learn what I can in three days time (gulp!)  I guess I&#039;ll find out how well I can handle my D90 and SB-600.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much, Neil!  I am working through your on-camera flash book and finding it extremely informative if a bit of a steep learning curve for someone at my level.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve suddenly been asked to take some shots of a wedding at New York&#8217;s City Hall in just a few days time, as a favor for a couple of friends.  They&#8217;re not expecting pro-quality work by any means, but I aim to do my best for them, so I am trying to learn what I can in three days time (gulp!)  I guess I&#8217;ll find out how well I can handle my D90 and SB-600.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-37906</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 05:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-37906</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Tom .. you need constant light, whether ambient light or manual flash.
You can&#039;t use this for TTL flash, except as an after-the-fact check to see if your exposure was correct.

Also read comment # 46

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Tom .. you need constant light, whether ambient light or manual flash.<br />
You can&#8217;t use this for TTL flash, except as an after-the-fact check to see if your exposure was correct.</p>
<p>Also read comment # 46</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-37905</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-37905</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Stephen, I think I understand that bit now.  Time for stupid question number two:  when using this method of metering (i.e., placing the brightest relevant tone appropriately near the right edge of the histogram) I assume I should not be firing my speedlight, correct?  If so, is this method intended for times when one is using only available or otherwise constant light such as studio lights?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Stephen, I think I understand that bit now.  Time for stupid question number two:  when using this method of metering (i.e., placing the brightest relevant tone appropriately near the right edge of the histogram) I assume I should not be firing my speedlight, correct?  If so, is this method intended for times when one is using only available or otherwise constant light such as studio lights?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-37831</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-37831</guid>
		<description>Tom,
The first Nikon histogram, where the right end of the histogram just approaches the chart&#039;s edge is the better one where white is the brightest relevant tone. See http://neilvn.com/tangents/images/histogram/histogram1.jpg

The second picture where the histogram spikes is bad for this image, because you start to overexpose the bride&#039;s dress (which is white).  You generally want to be able to see details on the bride&#039;s dress, so you want to avoid overexposing it. Overexposing the bride&#039;s dress washes out details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,<br />
The first Nikon histogram, where the right end of the histogram just approaches the chart&#8217;s edge is the better one where white is the brightest relevant tone. See <a href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/images/histogram/histogram1.jpg">http://neilvn.com/tangents/images/histogram/histogram1.jpg</a></p>
<p>The second picture where the histogram spikes is bad for this image, because you start to overexpose the bride&#8217;s dress (which is white).  You generally want to be able to see details on the bride&#8217;s dress, so you want to avoid overexposing it. Overexposing the bride&#8217;s dress washes out details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-37819</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-37819</guid>
		<description>Thanks for replying so quickly, Neil!  Just so I understand (and apologies for being a bit dense!) the second Nikon histogram is indeed the preferable one?  I usually try to avoid seeing a spike on the right side (as in the second histogram) and would instead likely aim for something closer to the first histogram.  But then I don&#039;t really know what I&#039;m doing, which is why I&#039;m asking the pros!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for replying so quickly, Neil!  Just so I understand (and apologies for being a bit dense!) the second Nikon histogram is indeed the preferable one?  I usually try to avoid seeing a spike on the right side (as in the second histogram) and would instead likely aim for something closer to the first histogram.  But then I don&#8217;t really know what I&#8217;m doing, which is why I&#8217;m asking the pros!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-37767</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 04:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-37767</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Tom .. in this case, where we have ONLY relevant tones in the image (ie, now super-bright backgrounds, etc), then we want the histogram to dip as close to the corner as possible ... for any white tones. No clipping.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Tom .. in this case, where we have ONLY relevant tones in the image (ie, now super-bright backgrounds, etc), then we want the histogram to dip as close to the corner as possible &#8230; for any white tones. No clipping.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-37766</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 04:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-37766</guid>
		<description>Ok, stupid question but here goes:  I am not sure which histogram above is our goal.  In the Nikon example, do we WANT the second histogram with the clipping on the right side?  I get the impression we do, but when Neil writes that the second image is &quot;2/3rd stop over-exposed&quot; it makes me wonder what he means, i.e., is the second shot &quot;over-exposed&quot; yet correctly exposed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, stupid question but here goes:  I am not sure which histogram above is our goal.  In the Nikon example, do we WANT the second histogram with the clipping on the right side?  I get the impression we do, but when Neil writes that the second image is &#8220;2/3rd stop over-exposed&#8221; it makes me wonder what he means, i.e., is the second shot &#8220;over-exposed&#8221; yet correctly exposed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-28764</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/#comment-28764</guid>
		<description>Sorry I meant also to say that one of the reasons I was asking was that for us RAW shooters, there is the option of exposing &quot;to the right&quot; as well and I wondered if you were an advocate of this or not. If not then would you have a different technique for metering a dark scene with a histogram?

Thanks and sorry for posting twice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I meant also to say that one of the reasons I was asking was that for us RAW shooters, there is the option of exposing &#8220;to the right&#8221; as well and I wondered if you were an advocate of this or not. If not then would you have a different technique for metering a dark scene with a histogram?</p>
<p>Thanks and sorry for posting twice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

