<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the Nikon D700 was released today &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/07/25/nikon-d700/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/07/25/nikon-d700/</link>
	<description>photography by Neil van Niekerk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:20:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/07/25/nikon-d700/#comment-1531</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/?p=183#comment-1531</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Adam ... I am loving the camera even more now.  I&#039;ll be so bold to say that right now there is no better camera on the market than the Nikon D700 if you look at quality vs cost.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Adam &#8230; I am loving the camera even more now.  I&#8217;ll be so bold to say that right now there is no better camera on the market than the Nikon D700 if you look at quality vs cost.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/07/25/nikon-d700/#comment-1530</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/?p=183#comment-1530</guid>
		<description>So what is your verdict now that you have had the  D700 for a while ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what is your verdict now that you have had the  D700 for a while ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/07/25/nikon-d700/#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 05:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/?p=183#comment-1526</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hi there Jaime ...

I can&#039;t remember if I wore grey ... but &lt;a href=&quot;http://planetneil.com/tangents/about/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I look like this&lt;/a&gt;.  ;)

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hi there Jaime &#8230;</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t remember if I wore grey &#8230; but <a href="http://planetneil.com/tangents/about/" rel="nofollow">I look like this</a>.  ;)</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaime Kae</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/07/25/nikon-d700/#comment-1525</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaime Kae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 03:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/?p=183#comment-1525</guid>
		<description>That is very impressive.

I was wandering around Time Square that same night.  I wonder if I saw you? I always notice photographers when I&#039;m out and about.  Were you wearing grey, perchance?

I was too lazy to bring my big camera, so my brothers got shots of the Star Wars peeps with my point and shoot.

My flashy, noisy picture of the same event is here:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3192/2726455863_08150b5d4d.jpg?v=0
(Yes, that&#039;s my husband... )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is very impressive.</p>
<p>I was wandering around Time Square that same night.  I wonder if I saw you? I always notice photographers when I&#8217;m out and about.  Were you wearing grey, perchance?</p>
<p>I was too lazy to bring my big camera, so my brothers got shots of the Star Wars peeps with my point and shoot.</p>
<p>My flashy, noisy picture of the same event is here:<br />
<a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3192/2726455863_08150b5d4d.jpg?v=0" rel="nofollow">http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3192/2726455863_08150b5d4d.jpg?v=0</a><br />
(Yes, that&#8217;s my husband&#8230; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/07/25/nikon-d700/#comment-1524</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/?p=183#comment-1524</guid>
		<description>Hi Neil,
Thanks for the reply.

I&#039;ve been using your histogram method on subjects that do not have white in them.  I was interpreting your notes literally when you mentioned &quot;brightest relevant tone,&quot; so I always targeted the brightest dominant color in the subject, but the resulting photographs always had colors that were slightly off.

Now that I think about it, your histogram method was based on the concept of aligning white correctly in the zone system (that spectrum you printed in your tutorial papers you gave me).  I guess that when I meter off something other than white, I end up shifting the white in that spectrum, so that makes the entire image look off.

More practice for me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Neil,<br />
Thanks for the reply.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using your histogram method on subjects that do not have white in them.  I was interpreting your notes literally when you mentioned &#8220;brightest relevant tone,&#8221; so I always targeted the brightest dominant color in the subject, but the resulting photographs always had colors that were slightly off.</p>
<p>Now that I think about it, your histogram method was based on the concept of aligning white correctly in the zone system (that spectrum you printed in your tutorial papers you gave me).  I guess that when I meter off something other than white, I end up shifting the white in that spectrum, so that makes the entire image look off.</p>
<p>More practice for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/07/25/nikon-d700/#comment-1523</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/?p=183#comment-1523</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Stephen,

In this case there isn&#039;t a predominant tone that is white, so using the histogram as I&#039;ve explained elsewhere, wouldn&#039;t really work. But there are other methods in achieving accurate exposure.

In this case, simply zeroing the needle in manual exposure mode did the trick.  With the mix of brighter tones and darker tones, and the use of matric metering, the camera metered correctly.  (I would&#039;ve had the same exposure if I had used an automatic meterin mode.)

Neil vN.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Stephen,</p>
<p>In this case there isn&#8217;t a predominant tone that is white, so using the histogram as I&#8217;ve explained elsewhere, wouldn&#8217;t really work. But there are other methods in achieving accurate exposure.</p>
<p>In this case, simply zeroing the needle in manual exposure mode did the trick.  With the mix of brighter tones and darker tones, and the use of matric metering, the camera metered correctly.  (I would&#8217;ve had the same exposure if I had used an automatic meterin mode.)</p>
<p>Neil vN.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/07/25/nikon-d700/#comment-1533</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/?p=183#comment-1533</guid>
		<description>Neil,
I forgot to ask this.  Where is the brightest relevant tone in this image for purposes of exposure metering?  Other than the subject&#039;s eyeballs, there is not much relevant white in the photograph.

I typically have trouble trying to figure where I should meter when it comes to subjects that do not have white.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil,<br />
I forgot to ask this.  Where is the brightest relevant tone in this image for purposes of exposure metering?  Other than the subject&#8217;s eyeballs, there is not much relevant white in the photograph.</p>
<p>I typically have trouble trying to figure where I should meter when it comes to subjects that do not have white.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/07/25/nikon-d700/#comment-1532</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/?p=183#comment-1532</guid>
		<description>I bought a D300 two days before Nikon announced the D700.  I have bad timing.

I do not see much graininess in the 100% photo you took.  That is impressive low-light sensitivity of the camera.  I guess the Canon 5D is dethroned?  And of course, your composition is excellent as usual.

I am also curious how the SB-900 works. I was interested in replacing my SB-600 with it, so I would enjoy hearing your thoughts on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought a D300 two days before Nikon announced the D700.  I have bad timing.</p>
<p>I do not see much graininess in the 100% photo you took.  That is impressive low-light sensitivity of the camera.  I guess the Canon 5D is dethroned?  And of course, your composition is excellent as usual.</p>
<p>I am also curious how the SB-900 works. I was interested in replacing my SB-600 with it, so I would enjoy hearing your thoughts on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/07/25/nikon-d700/#comment-1522</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/?p=183#comment-1522</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Richard ...

For me, the SB-900 improves so much on the SB-800 that it was an automatic upgrade.

I&#039;ll post a review in the next week or two.

Neil vN.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Richard &#8230;</p>
<p>For me, the SB-900 improves so much on the SB-800 that it was an automatic upgrade.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll post a review in the next week or two.</p>
<p>Neil vN.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Selby</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/07/25/nikon-d700/#comment-1520</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Selby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/?p=183#comment-1520</guid>
		<description>Wow!  The iso performance is stellar, outstanding shot.  I&#039;m glad to hear your impressed.  I like my D300 very much but this just raised the bar to a new level.

How do you like the SB900?

Now I wonder what Canon is cooking up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  The iso performance is stellar, outstanding shot.  I&#8217;m glad to hear your impressed.  I like my D300 very much but this just raised the bar to a new level.</p>
<p>How do you like the SB900?</p>
<p>Now I wonder what Canon is cooking up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
