<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: from the hip &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/08/30/from-the-hip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/08/30/from-the-hip/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=from-the-hip</link>
	<description>photography by Neil van Niekerk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:45:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/08/30/from-the-hip/#comment-26832</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 02:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/?p=195#comment-26832</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I used the black foamie thing to block light from hitting people directly behind me. 

Also, keep in mind that &quot;shooting  from the hip&quot; is a turn of phrase. I meant it as not holding the camera to your eye all the time. It doesn&#039;t necessarily mean I have the camera glued to my hip.

For example, with this image below, the perspective should tell you I had the camera around chest-height.

So read the article in that context, and not as a literal &quot;always with the camera at my hip&quot;.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;img src=&quot;http://neilvn.com/tangents/images/weddings/from-the-hip/Monica-Tim-3619.jpg&quot;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I used the black foamie thing to block light from hitting people directly behind me. </p>
<p>Also, keep in mind that &#8220;shooting  from the hip&#8221; is a turn of phrase. I meant it as not holding the camera to your eye all the time. It doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean I have the camera glued to my hip.</p>
<p>For example, with this image below, the perspective should tell you I had the camera around chest-height.</p>
<p>So read the article in that context, and not as a literal &#8220;always with the camera at my hip&#8221;.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
<p><img src="http://neilvn.com/tangents/images/weddings/from-the-hip/Monica-Tim-3619.jpg"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sportymonk</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/08/30/from-the-hip/#comment-26831</link>
		<dc:creator>Sportymonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 02:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/?p=195#comment-26831</guid>
		<description>I hate to be dense but I am back to the first question, if the camera is waist high, how can you possible not have the flash go into people&#039;s eyes. I am 5&#039;10&quot; +1/2 (that&#039;s important you know) and it would seem that unless the open side of the BFT was down (not an option) then the flash would be in my eyes. What am I missing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to be dense but I am back to the first question, if the camera is waist high, how can you possible not have the flash go into people&#8217;s eyes. I am 5&#8217;10&#8243; +1/2 (that&#8217;s important you know) and it would seem that unless the open side of the BFT was down (not an option) then the flash would be in my eyes. What am I missing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/08/30/from-the-hip/#comment-1869</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/?p=195#comment-1869</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hi there Daniel ...

Thank you for the compliment.
The EXIF data for that shot says the Canon 16-35mm f2.8 II was set to 16mm.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hi there Daniel &#8230;</p>
<p>Thank you for the compliment.<br />
The EXIF data for that shot says the Canon 16-35mm f2.8 II was set to 16mm.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daneil Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/08/30/from-the-hip/#comment-1875</link>
		<dc:creator>Daneil Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/?p=195#comment-1875</guid>
		<description>Hi Neil,
As always, beautiful! Even though this post is about focus and composure, i can&#039;t help but gawk at the beautiful lighting! Thanks for the inspiration. Can you tell me how wide your lens was for the second photo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Neil,<br />
As always, beautiful! Even though this post is about focus and composure, i can&#8217;t help but gawk at the beautiful lighting! Thanks for the inspiration. Can you tell me how wide your lens was for the second photo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/08/30/from-the-hip/#comment-1870</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/?p=195#comment-1870</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Jonas ...

Sorry, I am out of ideas on this one.

best of luck

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Jonas &#8230;</p>
<p>Sorry, I am out of ideas on this one.</p>
<p>best of luck</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/08/30/from-the-hip/#comment-1860</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/?p=195#comment-1860</guid>
		<description>Hi Neil
I checked it, but I had the camera in one shot focus mode like most of the time.
Could it be a mallfunction of the camera cause I searched the manual for it and they don&#039;t mention how to turn it on anywhere ...
Greetings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Neil<br />
I checked it, but I had the camera in one shot focus mode like most of the time.<br />
Could it be a mallfunction of the camera cause I searched the manual for it and they don&#8217;t mention how to turn it on anywhere &#8230;<br />
Greetings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/08/30/from-the-hip/#comment-1867</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 01:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/?p=195#comment-1867</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Jonas ...

You probably have your camera in Servo mode.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Jonas &#8230;</p>
<p>You probably have your camera in Servo mode.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/08/30/from-the-hip/#comment-1871</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/?p=195#comment-1871</guid>
		<description>Cool stuff!
I tried what you said here, today, but in manual mode my Speedlite doesn&#039;t seem toe fire the infrared beam...
Do you know why that is?
I use an EOS 40D with an EX 580II on top.
Greetz Jonas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool stuff!<br />
I tried what you said here, today, but in manual mode my Speedlite doesn&#8217;t seem toe fire the infrared beam&#8230;<br />
Do you know why that is?<br />
I use an EOS 40D with an EX 580II on top.<br />
Greetz Jonas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/08/30/from-the-hip/#comment-1851</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 02:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/?p=195#comment-1851</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://oneperfectmoment.com/images/johanna-aaron/Johanna-Aaron-0757-900.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://oneperfectmoment.com/images/johanna-aaron/Johanna-Aaron-0757.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;If however, you were referring to this image, the sky is that deep blue simply because I had the sun to my back and had everyone in full sunlight.

Neil vN
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://oneperfectmoment.com/images/johanna-aaron/Johanna-Aaron-0757-900.jpg"><img src="http://oneperfectmoment.com/images/johanna-aaron/Johanna-Aaron-0757.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>If however, you were referring to this image, the sky is that deep blue simply because I had the sun to my back and had everyone in full sunlight.</p>
<p>Neil vN
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/08/30/from-the-hip/#comment-1868</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 02:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/?p=195#comment-1868</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://oneperfectmoment.com/images/johanna-aaron/Johanna-Aaron-1037-900.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://oneperfectmoment.com/images/johanna-aaron/Johanna-Aaron-1037.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Joost ...

I think it is this image you are referring to?
In this instance, the flash is just very subtle fill-flash, of around -2EV or -3EV flash exposure compensation.  Therefore my exposure is pretty much only ambient light, and that is how I metered.  The flash didn&#039;t figure much.

I therefore had to base my exposure on the couple.  (In this instance I used the histogram method while metering off the bride&#039;s dress.)

This meant that the sky simply is the color it is.  I made NO attempt to control it or darken it, whether:
1.  in post-production, or
2. by having my basic exposure such that the sky is well exposed and then having to expose correctly for my couple by  using stronger flash.

This second option is usually the best way to control how deep you want the sky to be ... but it rarely looks good doing to with direct flash, and would need a fairly strong flash unit with a softbox to look good.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://oneperfectmoment.com/images/johanna-aaron/Johanna-Aaron-1037-900.jpg"><img src="http://oneperfectmoment.com/images/johanna-aaron/Johanna-Aaron-1037.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Joost &#8230;</p>
<p>I think it is this image you are referring to?<br />
In this instance, the flash is just very subtle fill-flash, of around -2EV or -3EV flash exposure compensation.  Therefore my exposure is pretty much only ambient light, and that is how I metered.  The flash didn&#8217;t figure much.</p>
<p>I therefore had to base my exposure on the couple.  (In this instance I used the histogram method while metering off the bride&#8217;s dress.)</p>
<p>This meant that the sky simply is the color it is.  I made NO attempt to control it or darken it, whether:<br />
1.  in post-production, or<br />
2. by having my basic exposure such that the sky is well exposed and then having to expose correctly for my couple by  using stronger flash.</p>
<p>This second option is usually the best way to control how deep you want the sky to be &#8230; but it rarely looks good doing to with direct flash, and would need a fairly strong flash unit with a softbox to look good.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

