<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: bokeh &#8211; the quality of blur</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/01/10/bokeh-the-quality-of-blur/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/01/10/bokeh-the-quality-of-blur/</link>
	<description>photography by Neil van Niekerk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:40:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jannine</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/01/10/bokeh-the-quality-of-blur/#comment-2275</link>
		<dc:creator>Jannine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=314#comment-2275</guid>
		<description>Thank you for a brilliant topic. I have often wondered what bokeh was, i hear people speak about it,but didn&#039;t like to ask. Neil i love this site &amp; your book. The thing is all the subjects are interesting, so much so i don&#039;t know where to look first. I keep flitting from one article to another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for a brilliant topic. I have often wondered what bokeh was, i hear people speak about it,but didn&#8217;t like to ask. Neil i love this site &amp; your book. The thing is all the subjects are interesting, so much so i don&#8217;t know where to look first. I keep flitting from one article to another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cappy</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/01/10/bokeh-the-quality-of-blur/#comment-2273</link>
		<dc:creator>cappy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=314#comment-2273</guid>
		<description>Neil...Thanks for a great well explained article.  It explained a lot of misinformation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil&#8230;Thanks for a great well explained article.  It explained a lot of misinformation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/01/10/bokeh-the-quality-of-blur/#comment-2274</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=314#comment-2274</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Artur .. I do use the fish-eye lens on occasion, but I do feel that it can easily look gimmicky if over-used.  Either way, I do believe it&#039;s a lens that needs to be in any photographer&#039;s bag.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Artur .. I do use the fish-eye lens on occasion, but I do feel that it can easily look gimmicky if over-used.  Either way, I do believe it&#8217;s a lens that needs to be in any photographer&#8217;s bag.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artur Ocubaro</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/01/10/bokeh-the-quality-of-blur/#comment-2272</link>
		<dc:creator>Artur Ocubaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=314#comment-2272</guid>
		<description>Hi Neil!

Thanks for your opinion, I really appreciate. I ve been wondering how do you find the time to do all your work and keep answering all the questions in your site? That&#039;s amazing and very respectful! Thanks.
And what do you think of the fisheye lenses? I do not think that you ve used in your esplendid work, do you have any restrictions about them?
Another question, when are you going to publish another book (whatever subject book)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Neil!</p>
<p>Thanks for your opinion, I really appreciate. I ve been wondering how do you find the time to do all your work and keep answering all the questions in your site? That&#8217;s amazing and very respectful! Thanks.<br />
And what do you think of the fisheye lenses? I do not think that you ve used in your esplendid work, do you have any restrictions about them?<br />
Another question, when are you going to publish another book (whatever subject book)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/01/10/bokeh-the-quality-of-blur/#comment-2270</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 07:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=314#comment-2270</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Artur, the Canon 85mm f1.2 (both AF versions) are rightfully regarded as wonderful optics.  Their bokeh is just wonderful.  Especially on a camera like the 5D which has a tendency to vignette to the corners, the 85mm f1.2 can give an ethereal look when used wide open.

The Canon 24-105mm f4 is a great all-round lens with excellent optical performance.  But don&#039;t expect the bokeh to look nice.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Artur, the Canon 85mm f1.2 (both AF versions) are rightfully regarded as wonderful optics.  Their bokeh is just wonderful.  Especially on a camera like the 5D which has a tendency to vignette to the corners, the 85mm f1.2 can give an ethereal look when used wide open.</p>
<p>The Canon 24-105mm f4 is a great all-round lens with excellent optical performance.  But don&#8217;t expect the bokeh to look nice.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artur Ocubaro</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/01/10/bokeh-the-quality-of-blur/#comment-2268</link>
		<dc:creator>Artur Ocubaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 14:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=314#comment-2268</guid>
		<description>Hi Neil!

Beautiful photos, magnific explanations........thanks!

What is your opinion about Canon 85 f 1.2 regarding bokeh? And a question that may be redundant or repetitive but Id really like to hear your opinion.....Im going to buy the 5D MII and definitely the 24-70 2.8, but I m also really thinking about the 24-105 because there is a 350 dollars discount when bought with the 5D. Anyway I ll buy the 24-70, but what do you think about the 24-105 as a allday lens because of the much less weight? Would you use that?
Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Neil!</p>
<p>Beautiful photos, magnific explanations&#8230;&#8230;..thanks!</p>
<p>What is your opinion about Canon 85 f 1.2 regarding bokeh? And a question that may be redundant or repetitive but Id really like to hear your opinion&#8230;..Im going to buy the 5D MII and definitely the 24-70 2.8, but I m also really thinking about the 24-105 because there is a 350 dollars discount when bought with the 5D. Anyway I ll buy the 24-70, but what do you think about the 24-105 as a allday lens because of the much less weight? Would you use that?<br />
Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/01/10/bokeh-the-quality-of-blur/#comment-2267</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=314#comment-2267</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Anoop, as soon as I have the 70-200mm f2.8G VR II, I&#039;ll be sure to give it a test drive and report back.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Anoop, as soon as I have the 70-200mm f2.8G VR II, I&#8217;ll be sure to give it a test drive and report back.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anoop nair</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/01/10/bokeh-the-quality-of-blur/#comment-2266</link>
		<dc:creator>Anoop nair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=314#comment-2266</guid>
		<description>Neil

Any Bokeh Experience with  Nikon AF-S Zoom-Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II lens ? I am Planning to get the VR II Version. I do own a Nikon D300&amp; D3X. Need some advice.
Thanks
Anoop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil</p>
<p>Any Bokeh Experience with  Nikon AF-S Zoom-Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II lens ? I am Planning to get the VR II Version. I do own a Nikon D300&#038; D3X. Need some advice.<br />
Thanks<br />
Anoop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internetagentur Bremen</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/01/10/bokeh-the-quality-of-blur/#comment-2265</link>
		<dc:creator>Internetagentur Bremen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=314#comment-2265</guid>
		<description>Hi Neil!
Your Website is so inspiring to me.
Thanks allot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Neil!<br />
Your Website is so inspiring to me.<br />
Thanks allot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/01/10/bokeh-the-quality-of-blur/#comment-2269</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 07:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=314#comment-2269</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Jury, I have no experience of the Nikon 18-105mm VR 3.5-5.6 lens, so I can&#039;t comment on the bokeh.

As for depth-of-field, with a fairly slow aperture, and on a crop sensor camera, you won&#039;t get fantastic shallow depth-of-field.  It&#039;s the nature of using a small aperture.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Jury, I have no experience of the Nikon 18-105mm VR 3.5-5.6 lens, so I can&#8217;t comment on the bokeh.</p>
<p>As for depth-of-field, with a fairly slow aperture, and on a crop sensor camera, you won&#8217;t get fantastic shallow depth-of-field.  It&#8217;s the nature of using a small aperture.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
