<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the black foamie thing ..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/11/21/the-black-foamie-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/11/21/the-black-foamie-thing/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-black-foamie-thing</link>
	<description>photography by Neil van Niekerk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:03:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MAK</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/11/21/the-black-foamie-thing/#comment-46727</link>
		<dc:creator>MAK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 03:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=1814#comment-46727</guid>
		<description>Neil,
Thank you for your artistry, your perseverance with us amateurs, and your attitude to your customers.
I just saw your &quot;thingy&quot; article and it solved many problems of mine.  But with one problem last week, I simply couldn&#039;t find a solution.  It was a friend&#039;s party, out in the park, in the middle of the night with no surfaces to bounce my flash.  In a moment of inspiration (or idiocy, whichever you prefer) I turn the flash 180 pointing towards my big, bald head and...it actually gave the photos a nice soft white balance.  I looked kind of weird shooting a flash backwards, but it worked!
Thank you again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil,<br />
Thank you for your artistry, your perseverance with us amateurs, and your attitude to your customers.<br />
I just saw your &#8220;thingy&#8221; article and it solved many problems of mine.  But with one problem last week, I simply couldn&#8217;t find a solution.  It was a friend&#8217;s party, out in the park, in the middle of the night with no surfaces to bounce my flash.  In a moment of inspiration (or idiocy, whichever you prefer) I turn the flash 180 pointing towards my big, bald head and&#8230;it actually gave the photos a nice soft white balance.  I looked kind of weird shooting a flash backwards, but it worked!<br />
Thank you again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/11/21/the-black-foamie-thing/#comment-42558</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 01:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=1814#comment-42558</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Zach .. the Nikon SB-600 does rotate 180 degrees to the one side. Then tilt it slightly &quot;forward&quot; so it faces back and up. 

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Zach .. the Nikon SB-600 does rotate 180 degrees to the one side. Then tilt it slightly &#8220;forward&#8221; so it faces back and up. </p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/11/21/the-black-foamie-thing/#comment-42547</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=1814#comment-42547</guid>
		<description>So, I have an SB600 and it doesn&#039;t tilt backwards, how would you use the black foamie thing in that case? Would there be anyway to make it work, or am I limited to a diffuser and bouncing it off the ceiling? Maybe use the black foamie thing tilted up and to the right or left a little?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I have an SB600 and it doesn&#8217;t tilt backwards, how would you use the black foamie thing in that case? Would there be anyway to make it work, or am I limited to a diffuser and bouncing it off the ceiling? Maybe use the black foamie thing tilted up and to the right or left a little?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/11/21/the-black-foamie-thing/#comment-41042</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=1814#comment-41042</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If you&#039;re in an area where you have nothing to bounce your flash off, then the Stofen with the top cut open, won&#039;t offer you any benefits ... in fact, it might just make your flash less efficient. 

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If you&#8217;re in an area where you have nothing to bounce your flash off, then the Stofen with the top cut open, won&#8217;t offer you any benefits &#8230; in fact, it might just make your flash less efficient. </p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/11/21/the-black-foamie-thing/#comment-40965</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=1814#comment-40965</guid>
		<description>I like your policy of no single flash solution.  I was wondering what you use at an evening party. Often the lighting will be dim compared to a wedding and more &quot;snaps&quot; than set up shots. I&#039;ll try all your suggestions, but would a stofen with a cut out top be best for the majority of quick shots in a party room atmosphere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your policy of no single flash solution.  I was wondering what you use at an evening party. Often the lighting will be dim compared to a wedding and more &#8220;snaps&#8221; than set up shots. I&#8217;ll try all your suggestions, but would a stofen with a cut out top be best for the majority of quick shots in a party room atmosphere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Portrait of a Whippet &#124; Marc de Ridder Photography</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/11/21/the-black-foamie-thing/#comment-33096</link>
		<dc:creator>Portrait of a Whippet &#124; Marc de Ridder Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=1814#comment-33096</guid>
		<description>[...] specifically caught my eye was the simplicity of it all, and Neil&#8217;s ingenuity to use &#8216;the black foamie thing&#8217; for bounce flash. So the following day I went into town to hunt down some black foam. It [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] specifically caught my eye was the simplicity of it all, and Neil&#8217;s ingenuity to use &#8216;the black foamie thing&#8217; for bounce flash. So the following day I went into town to hunt down some black foam. It [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trev</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/11/21/the-black-foamie-thing/#comment-28271</link>
		<dc:creator>Trev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=1814#comment-28271</guid>
		<description>Also, if shooting wide angle, that will make the flash spread a wider field thinking it needs to shoot wide, so manually zooming flash head in at full 200mm will help a little. 

Remember, you are bouncing, so you already will get a wider return of flash and zooming in will concentrate the light tighter giving more power/range where it&#039;s shooting to.

Trev</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, if shooting wide angle, that will make the flash spread a wider field thinking it needs to shoot wide, so manually zooming flash head in at full 200mm will help a little. </p>
<p>Remember, you are bouncing, so you already will get a wider return of flash and zooming in will concentrate the light tighter giving more power/range where it&#8217;s shooting to.</p>
<p>Trev</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/11/21/the-black-foamie-thing/#comment-28263</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=1814#comment-28263</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The BFT does cut some of the flash&#039;s power. So if you have problems with the flash just not having enough juice, by all means do try it without the BFT.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The BFT does cut some of the flash&#8217;s power. So if you have problems with the flash just not having enough juice, by all means do try it without the BFT.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/11/21/the-black-foamie-thing/#comment-27138</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=1814#comment-27138</guid>
		<description>Neil,
just wondering how much of the BFT extends out beyond the end of the flash head
when you shoot in decent size churches and large rooms.  i shot a friends wedding yesterday at similar settings you would use, bouncing flash to my right and up off of the church walls during the processional. they were under exposed a bit as if the flash had little reach.  could i have been cutting off power by having the BFT extending out too much?  i read a reply by you on another post explaining this as a possible factor.  the BFT was about 1.5&quot; - 2&quot; in front of my flash head.  the church was fairly narrow.

Nikon D700
SB-900
24-70  f2.8

thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil,<br />
just wondering how much of the BFT extends out beyond the end of the flash head<br />
when you shoot in decent size churches and large rooms.  i shot a friends wedding yesterday at similar settings you would use, bouncing flash to my right and up off of the church walls during the processional. they were under exposed a bit as if the flash had little reach.  could i have been cutting off power by having the BFT extending out too much?  i read a reply by you on another post explaining this as a possible factor.  the BFT was about 1.5&#8243; &#8211; 2&#8243; in front of my flash head.  the church was fairly narrow.</p>
<p>Nikon D700<br />
SB-900<br />
24-70  f2.8</p>
<p>thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/11/21/the-black-foamie-thing/#comment-27119</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 03:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=1814#comment-27119</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Dro, &lt;a href=&quot;http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/03/14/bounce-flash-catchlights/&quot;&gt;bounce your flash into the direction you want your light to come from - just like you had set up an off-camera softbox&lt;/a&gt;. Then the catch-lights will be there in the eyes, nearly automatically.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Dro, <a href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/03/14/bounce-flash-catchlights/">bounce your flash into the direction you want your light to come from &#8211; just like you had set up an off-camera softbox</a>. Then the catch-lights will be there in the eyes, nearly automatically.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

