<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the advantage of a higher max sync speed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/01/17/higher-max-sync-speed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/01/17/higher-max-sync-speed/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=higher-max-sync-speed</link>
	<description>photography by Neil van Niekerk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:18:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thorsten</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/01/17/higher-max-sync-speed/#comment-5025</link>
		<dc:creator>Thorsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2115#comment-5025</guid>
		<description>Yes indeed, I have been one of those photographers that found out the hard way, that shooting max sync speed in the studio leaves me with a dark edge on the image. It took me a while to have the &quot;Eureka moment&quot; with this as I didn&#039;t really know what the problem was at first - after all, I was doing everything right! But when I did figure it out, I was kicking myself - the solution was so simple - just use a lower shutter speed!

No doubt most readers know this already but what they may not realise (and hence the reason for my response here) is that this problem does not occur if one fires the studio flash using a speedlite (dialled down to min. power) instead of a radio trigger, then shooting at max sync speed works fine. Personally, I prefer to use a radio trigger and live with the lower shutter speed as it makes for easier handling on account of the lighter weight on the hotshoe. But it&#039;s nice to know there&#039;s a way to get max sync speed while still triggering remotely.

- Thorsten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes indeed, I have been one of those photographers that found out the hard way, that shooting max sync speed in the studio leaves me with a dark edge on the image. It took me a while to have the &#8220;Eureka moment&#8221; with this as I didn&#8217;t really know what the problem was at first &#8211; after all, I was doing everything right! But when I did figure it out, I was kicking myself &#8211; the solution was so simple &#8211; just use a lower shutter speed!</p>
<p>No doubt most readers know this already but what they may not realise (and hence the reason for my response here) is that this problem does not occur if one fires the studio flash using a speedlite (dialled down to min. power) instead of a radio trigger, then shooting at max sync speed works fine. Personally, I prefer to use a radio trigger and live with the lower shutter speed as it makes for easier handling on account of the lighter weight on the hotshoe. But it&#8217;s nice to know there&#8217;s a way to get max sync speed while still triggering remotely.</p>
<p>- Thorsten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/01/17/higher-max-sync-speed/#comment-5024</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 03:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2115#comment-5024</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Many photographers have found out the hard way not to shoot at ma sync speed in the studio because of exactly that problem.  You can see the edge of the one curtain.

The problem arises because of propagation delay.

By the time your camera fires the radio trigger which fires another radio trigger which trips the lighting .. there is a small delay.  This can become significant.

It varies from setup to setup.

I have the same problem with the Nikon D3 under certain situations, where I can&#039;t use 1/250 because of that.  I have to shoot at 1/200 or lower.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Many photographers have found out the hard way not to shoot at ma sync speed in the studio because of exactly that problem.  You can see the edge of the one curtain.</p>
<p>The problem arises because of propagation delay.</p>
<p>By the time your camera fires the radio trigger which fires another radio trigger which trips the lighting .. there is a small delay.  This can become significant.</p>
<p>It varies from setup to setup.</p>
<p>I have the same problem with the Nikon D3 under certain situations, where I can&#8217;t use 1/250 because of that.  I have to shoot at 1/200 or lower.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Millios</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/01/17/higher-max-sync-speed/#comment-5023</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Millios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 02:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2115#comment-5023</guid>
		<description>The 5D Mark II has a rated max flash sync speed of 1/200.  In actuality there is a faint black line.  If you want a full-sensor crisp picture, you need to drop it to 1/160.  This happens on my camera, and on several other people&#039;s who have 5DII cameras.  Others have reported no problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 5D Mark II has a rated max flash sync speed of 1/200.  In actuality there is a faint black line.  If you want a full-sensor crisp picture, you need to drop it to 1/160.  This happens on my camera, and on several other people&#8217;s who have 5DII cameras.  Others have reported no problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/01/17/higher-max-sync-speed/#comment-5022</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2115#comment-5022</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Anoop, however you decide to balance your settings, the combination of settings (shutter speed / ISO / aperture) has to be such that you don&#039;t over-expose the ambient light for your subject.

In other words, you can&#039;t both have a wide aperture AND a medium shutter speed (such as 1/250) on a sunny day.  (Unless you use an ND filter.)

So to use a wide aperture, you have to go to a higher shutter speed.   Simple.

But your flash does become less efficient.  Whether this important though, will depend on what you&#039;re actually trying to achieve with flash ... and the specifics of the scenario you are photographing.

I also can&#039;t give you specific advice about the flash exposure compensation, since this too will depend on what you&#039;re trying to achieve, or the specific scenario you are photographing.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Anoop, however you decide to balance your settings, the combination of settings (shutter speed / ISO / aperture) has to be such that you don&#8217;t over-expose the ambient light for your subject.</p>
<p>In other words, you can&#8217;t both have a wide aperture AND a medium shutter speed (such as 1/250) on a sunny day.  (Unless you use an ND filter.)</p>
<p>So to use a wide aperture, you have to go to a higher shutter speed.   Simple.</p>
<p>But your flash does become less efficient.  Whether this important though, will depend on what you&#8217;re actually trying to achieve with flash &#8230; and the specifics of the scenario you are photographing.</p>
<p>I also can&#8217;t give you specific advice about the flash exposure compensation, since this too will depend on what you&#8217;re trying to achieve, or the specific scenario you are photographing.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anoop Nair</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/01/17/higher-max-sync-speed/#comment-5021</link>
		<dc:creator>Anoop Nair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2115#comment-5021</guid>
		<description>Hello Neil

iam a Nikon Shooter and got a Question Iam out on  a Sunny day and want to use the Wide open Aperture (2.8 or 4) to Get a Shallow Depth of field without blowing out the Background. Shuld i keep my flash outpower to -1.5 to -1.7 TTL BL and switch to Auto FP(1/250 or 1/300) Hope you can help me.
Thanks
Anoop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Neil</p>
<p>iam a Nikon Shooter and got a Question Iam out on  a Sunny day and want to use the Wide open Aperture (2.8 or 4) to Get a Shallow Depth of field without blowing out the Background. Shuld i keep my flash outpower to -1.5 to -1.7 TTL BL and switch to Auto FP(1/250 or 1/300) Hope you can help me.<br />
Thanks<br />
Anoop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/01/17/higher-max-sync-speed/#comment-5020</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2115#comment-5020</guid>
		<description>Hi Neil, Yes I see what you mean now. As I would be using the flash for fill-in, the loss in flash power would not be that bad as I would only need a blip of flash to light the subject. Thanks
Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Neil, Yes I see what you mean now. As I would be using the flash for fill-in, the loss in flash power would not be that bad as I would only need a blip of flash to light the subject. Thanks<br />
Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/01/17/higher-max-sync-speed/#comment-5019</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2115#comment-5019</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Nick, what you&#039;re seeing there is that you can go into high-speed-sync mode with your SB-800.

However, the max flash sync speed on your camera still remains 1/320 (or 1/250)

Go through this article on &lt;a href=&quot;http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/12/13/maximum-flash-sync-speed/&quot;&gt;maximum flash sync speed&lt;/a&gt; for more on this.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Nick, what you&#8217;re seeing there is that you can go into high-speed-sync mode with your SB-800.</p>
<p>However, the max flash sync speed on your camera still remains 1/320 (or 1/250)</p>
<p>Go through this article on <a href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/12/13/maximum-flash-sync-speed/">maximum flash sync speed</a> for more on this.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/01/17/higher-max-sync-speed/#comment-5018</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2115#comment-5018</guid>
		<description>Hi, Can you explain why with my pop up flash the flash sync speed is 1/320, but when I use my sb800 it becomes irrelevent. I found this out the other day when I was exposing for the background and got a shutter speed of 1/1000. I then popped the pop up flash up and it dropped to 1/320. I was in manual mode. Consequently the background was over exposed.
Thanks,
Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Can you explain why with my pop up flash the flash sync speed is 1/320, but when I use my sb800 it becomes irrelevent. I found this out the other day when I was exposing for the background and got a shutter speed of 1/1000. I then popped the pop up flash up and it dropped to 1/320. I was in manual mode. Consequently the background was over exposed.<br />
Thanks,<br />
Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/01/17/higher-max-sync-speed/#comment-5014</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2115#comment-5014</guid>
		<description>Hugo Vincent,
If you set the flash sync speed on the D300 and D700 to 1/320, your usable flash range is diminished by almost half.  I talked to Neil about this in an earlier post on D300 settings: http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/04/04/nikon-d300-custom-settings/#comment-590

The flash sync speed that provides the longest flash range for the two cameras is 1/250, which is currently what most Nikon models support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugo Vincent,<br />
If you set the flash sync speed on the D300 and D700 to 1/320, your usable flash range is diminished by almost half.  I talked to Neil about this in an earlier post on D300 settings: <a href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/04/04/nikon-d300-custom-settings/#comment-590">http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/04/04/nikon-d300-custom-settings/#comment-590</a></p>
<p>The flash sync speed that provides the longest flash range for the two cameras is 1/250, which is currently what most Nikon models support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/01/17/higher-max-sync-speed/#comment-5017</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2115#comment-5017</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Thanks!  Typo is fixed now.  Others also pointed out the mistake.
I take it as  good sign that people are actually following what is written.  ;)

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Thanks!  Typo is fixed now.  Others also pointed out the mistake.<br />
I take it as  good sign that people are actually following what is written.  ;)</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

