<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac-centricity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/01/mac-centricity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/01/mac-centricity/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mac-centricity</link>
	<description>photography by Neil van Niekerk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:21:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Owen</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/01/mac-centricity/#comment-13864</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 09:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2149#comment-13864</guid>
		<description>Glad you like your macs. I was forced to use them in graphic design school and couldn&#039;t get away from them fast enough once I was done. 

Having said that I might one day entertain the notion of trying a new mac, especially now that they have Intel processors and can run the Windows OS... seems like it *could* be the best of both worlds. 

But for now, I&#039;ll continue to be PC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you like your macs. I was forced to use them in graphic design school and couldn&#8217;t get away from them fast enough once I was done. </p>
<p>Having said that I might one day entertain the notion of trying a new mac, especially now that they have Intel processors and can run the Windows OS&#8230; seems like it *could* be the best of both worlds. </p>
<p>But for now, I&#8217;ll continue to be PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trev</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/01/mac-centricity/#comment-13828</link>
		<dc:creator>trev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2149#comment-13828</guid>
		<description>HI Neil,

Did you ever get to try and evaluate Aperture?

I did not see any posts you did unless I missed it.

Aperture has by far the best &#039;details ressurector&#039; I have seen. I am PC based at the moment and tried Aperture on a mate&#039;s iMac.

I am going by whereby I had to shoot a house for a client [already shot his daughter&#039;s wedding and he was selling his house], and of course he wanted it done in the &#039;wrong&#039; time of day, with daylight falling opposite the main features he wanted to show. No amount of talking could convince him to choose another time of day.

So I took the shots, and I deliberately opened up the exposure by shooting 2.5 stops over the &#039;proper&#039; exposure to get more details in the shaded area. It really blew out the white walls in the sun, but I thought I would take several and combine them if need be [camera on tripod].

Opened up the raw in ACR, recovered the highlights, looked pretty good, tried it in LR, same result, then I took the file just for the hell of it to my mate&#039;s place [iMac+Aperture] as he&#039;s been on my case for years to get a Mac.

Well, I was absolutely stunned, the details in the wall that come out were amazing, very easily seen.

So I was wondering if you had any chance to compare.

Thanks for all the great info on your site btw, even though I and many others here may have been shooting for years, you always learn, and even looking thru some of your older posts, I can see how you have evolved yourself, and the best piece of advice I have ever received is the &#039;black foamy thingy&#039;, used to use white cards to bounce back or sides, but the &#039;black foam&#039; just makes perfect sense.


Trev.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Neil,</p>
<p>Did you ever get to try and evaluate Aperture?</p>
<p>I did not see any posts you did unless I missed it.</p>
<p>Aperture has by far the best &#8216;details ressurector&#8217; I have seen. I am PC based at the moment and tried Aperture on a mate&#8217;s iMac.</p>
<p>I am going by whereby I had to shoot a house for a client [already shot his daughter's wedding and he was selling his house], and of course he wanted it done in the &#8216;wrong&#8217; time of day, with daylight falling opposite the main features he wanted to show. No amount of talking could convince him to choose another time of day.</p>
<p>So I took the shots, and I deliberately opened up the exposure by shooting 2.5 stops over the &#8216;proper&#8217; exposure to get more details in the shaded area. It really blew out the white walls in the sun, but I thought I would take several and combine them if need be [camera on tripod].</p>
<p>Opened up the raw in ACR, recovered the highlights, looked pretty good, tried it in LR, same result, then I took the file just for the hell of it to my mate&#8217;s place [iMac+Aperture] as he&#8217;s been on my case for years to get a Mac.</p>
<p>Well, I was absolutely stunned, the details in the wall that come out were amazing, very easily seen.</p>
<p>So I was wondering if you had any chance to compare.</p>
<p>Thanks for all the great info on your site btw, even though I and many others here may have been shooting for years, you always learn, and even looking thru some of your older posts, I can see how you have evolved yourself, and the best piece of advice I have ever received is the &#8216;black foamy thingy&#8217;, used to use white cards to bounce back or sides, but the &#8216;black foam&#8217; just makes perfect sense.</p>
<p>Trev.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/01/mac-centricity/#comment-13792</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 17:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2149#comment-13792</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Jay ... I don&#039;t use iPhoto for anything other than getting images and video clips off my iPhone onto my computer.  And I also use it to assemble the slideshow on my iPad.  

I don&#039;t like how iPhoto removes direct control over the images (and their location) away from me.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Jay &#8230; I don&#8217;t use iPhoto for anything other than getting images and video clips off my iPhone onto my computer.  And I also use it to assemble the slideshow on my iPad.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like how iPhoto removes direct control over the images (and their location) away from me.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/01/mac-centricity/#comment-13781</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2149#comment-13781</guid>
		<description>Niel,
  First I want to say this is great website.  My question is about IPHOTO.  Are you using it for any part of your workflow or storage.  I generally inport my photos directly to IPHOTO and then go from there to LR OR PS for any editing.  I have had mixed results with IPHOTO.  It has crashed twice and lost all my photos. Forunately I was able to recover them but it has made me very wary of using IPHOTO as one of my storage locations.  I back up my images that I have on my website on the hard drive in a file and on a backup storage unit.

Jay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Niel,<br />
  First I want to say this is great website.  My question is about IPHOTO.  Are you using it for any part of your workflow or storage.  I generally inport my photos directly to IPHOTO and then go from there to LR OR PS for any editing.  I have had mixed results with IPHOTO.  It has crashed twice and lost all my photos. Forunately I was able to recover them but it has made me very wary of using IPHOTO as one of my storage locations.  I back up my images that I have on my website on the hard drive in a file and on a backup storage unit.</p>
<p>Jay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anka</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/01/mac-centricity/#comment-10683</link>
		<dc:creator>Anka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2149#comment-10683</guid>
		<description>In photography terms you can look at PC and Mac users as you do JPG users and RAW users. RAW just rules. JPG users don&#039;t want to hear the simple solution of changing to RAW, they just want to know how they can fix their ever problematic JPGs. It&#039;s only when they change over to RAW that they understand what the fuss was all about! Simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In photography terms you can look at PC and Mac users as you do JPG users and RAW users. RAW just rules. JPG users don&#8217;t want to hear the simple solution of changing to RAW, they just want to know how they can fix their ever problematic JPGs. It&#8217;s only when they change over to RAW that they understand what the fuss was all about! Simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/01/mac-centricity/#comment-5562</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2149#comment-5562</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But how are you going to control your computer?  
Aside from a wired keyboard and mouse?

The wires would make it a cluttered setup again. 

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But how are you going to control your computer?<br />
Aside from a wired keyboard and mouse?</p>
<p>The wires would make it a cluttered setup again. </p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John.B</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/01/mac-centricity/#comment-5561</link>
		<dc:creator>John.B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2149#comment-5561</guid>
		<description>Note that while the Bluetooth keyboard and mouse are &quot;nice to haves&quot;, they aren&#039;t necessary to run your MBP in clamshell mode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that while the Bluetooth keyboard and mouse are &#8220;nice to haves&#8221;, they aren&#8217;t necessary to run your MBP in clamshell mode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niko</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/01/mac-centricity/#comment-5539</link>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 11:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2149#comment-5539</guid>
		<description>Great website Neil, thx for sharing so much!  I use both Mac and PC, but ended up doing all photo(NIKON) work on Mac, it works great, and a choice must be made because collecting software for both platforms does not make sense.  I&#039;ve been using CAPTURE NX2, which works just excellent (except for speed when doing batches in RAW).  Those who have not seen it, may want to take a look at it: great value for price.  I&#039;m getting more and more curious about Aperture I must admit, but like you said yourself, one simply cannnot know, own, and use them all..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great website Neil, thx for sharing so much!  I use both Mac and PC, but ended up doing all photo(NIKON) work on Mac, it works great, and a choice must be made because collecting software for both platforms does not make sense.  I&#8217;ve been using CAPTURE NX2, which works just excellent (except for speed when doing batches in RAW).  Those who have not seen it, may want to take a look at it: great value for price.  I&#8217;m getting more and more curious about Aperture I must admit, but like you said yourself, one simply cannnot know, own, and use them all..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/01/mac-centricity/#comment-5503</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2149#comment-5503</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The geek in me thinks this is so cool:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.softpedia.com/news/Couple-Gets-Married-in-Apple-Retail-Store-135530.shtml&quot; target=&quot;_new&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a couple getting married in the Apple Store on 5th Avenue in Manhattan&lt;/a&gt;. 

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The geek in me thinks this is so cool:<br />
<a href="http://news.softpedia.com/news/Couple-Gets-Married-in-Apple-Retail-Store-135530.shtml" target="_new" rel="nofollow">a couple getting married in the Apple Store on 5th Avenue in Manhattan</a>. </p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/01/mac-centricity/#comment-5176</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2149#comment-5176</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Kathleen .. re the software, you could contact Adobe, and for a very small fee, transfer your Windows license for a Mac license for your Photoshop software.

Lightroom is cross-platform, so no drama and extra cost there.

I took a hit in having to buy another copy of CS4 because I wanted Photoshop on my Mac as well.  (I still think it is extortion from Adobe.)

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Kathleen .. re the software, you could contact Adobe, and for a very small fee, transfer your Windows license for a Mac license for your Photoshop software.</p>
<p>Lightroom is cross-platform, so no drama and extra cost there.</p>
<p>I took a hit in having to buy another copy of CS4 because I wanted Photoshop on my Mac as well.  (I still think it is extortion from Adobe.)</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

