<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: balancing flash and ambient exposure &#8211; where do you even start?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/09/balancing-flash-and-ambient-exposure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/09/balancing-flash-and-ambient-exposure/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=balancing-flash-and-ambient-exposure</link>
	<description>photography by Neil van Niekerk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:03:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bogdan</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/09/balancing-flash-and-ambient-exposure/#comment-19353</link>
		<dc:creator>Bogdan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2241#comment-19353</guid>
		<description>Hi Neil,

I&#039;ve just ordered your books. I can&#039;t wait to read them. Till then I have a question:
When you use manual flash to set proper exposure for your subject,  does it matter how you set your camera to measure the exposure of the ambient light (matrix, center-weighted or spot)? What about TTL?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Neil,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just ordered your books. I can&#8217;t wait to read them. Till then I have a question:<br />
When you use manual flash to set proper exposure for your subject,  does it matter how you set your camera to measure the exposure of the ambient light (matrix, center-weighted or spot)? What about TTL?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/09/balancing-flash-and-ambient-exposure/#comment-18747</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 00:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2241#comment-18747</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Brad ..

Aperture most certainly does affect the ambient exposure. 
And it affects ambient light as directly as a change in shutter speed would.

Where the &#039;SAAF&#039; concept comes in, is with manual flash where there would be a methodical approach to setting the correct flash exposure. Then changing the aperture means juggling the other variables - ISO, distance, power - and hence it is easier to just change the shutter speed to affect the ambient exposure. (Shutter speed is your only independent variable here which doesn&#039;t in turn affect flash exposure.

Yes ... f4 @ 1/250 will give you the same ambient exposure as f2.8 @ 1/500

Here&#039;s a related article which will hopefully clear things up a bit ... &lt;a href=&quot;http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/11/10/when-aperture-does-not-control-flash-exposure/&quot;&gt;when aperture does not control flash exposure&lt;/a&gt;.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Brad ..</p>
<p>Aperture most certainly does affect the ambient exposure.<br />
And it affects ambient light as directly as a change in shutter speed would.</p>
<p>Where the &#8216;SAAF&#8217; concept comes in, is with manual flash where there would be a methodical approach to setting the correct flash exposure. Then changing the aperture means juggling the other variables &#8211; ISO, distance, power &#8211; and hence it is easier to just change the shutter speed to affect the ambient exposure. (Shutter speed is your only independent variable here which doesn&#8217;t in turn affect flash exposure.</p>
<p>Yes &#8230; f4 @ 1/250 will give you the same ambient exposure as f2.8 @ 1/500</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a related article which will hopefully clear things up a bit &#8230; <a href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/11/10/when-aperture-does-not-control-flash-exposure/">when aperture does not control flash exposure</a>.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad King</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/09/balancing-flash-and-ambient-exposure/#comment-18684</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 01:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2241#comment-18684</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your books ( I already have the second one) and website.  I have been slowly digesting your principles and it&#039;s been a great help!  Looking forward to one of your tutoring sessions. 

 My question is this.  I remember reading the SAAF concept.  Shutter speed affects ambient light and aperture the flash.  I understand why shutter speed doesn&#039;t influence flash  (at least below max sync speed) but doesn&#039;t aperture affect ambient light?  I&#039;m sure it does some but not directly as much as shutter speed does?  In other words as far as ambient light goes if you shot  f/4 at 1/250 will you get just as much ambient light shooting  f/2.8 at 1/500?  And if not why since you are allowing the same amount of light hit the sensor.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your books ( I already have the second one) and website.  I have been slowly digesting your principles and it&#8217;s been a great help!  Looking forward to one of your tutoring sessions. </p>
<p> My question is this.  I remember reading the SAAF concept.  Shutter speed affects ambient light and aperture the flash.  I understand why shutter speed doesn&#8217;t influence flash  (at least below max sync speed) but doesn&#8217;t aperture affect ambient light?  I&#8217;m sure it does some but not directly as much as shutter speed does?  In other words as far as ambient light goes if you shot  f/4 at 1/250 will you get just as much ambient light shooting  f/2.8 at 1/500?  And if not why since you are allowing the same amount of light hit the sensor.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/09/balancing-flash-and-ambient-exposure/#comment-10864</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 01:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2241#comment-10864</guid>
		<description>I think this article is clearer after reading Neil&#039;s more recent article first.
http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/11/04/flash-photography-essentials/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this article is clearer after reading Neil&#8217;s more recent article first.<br />
<a href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/11/04/flash-photography-essentials/">http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/11/04/flash-photography-essentials/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rogerio</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/09/balancing-flash-and-ambient-exposure/#comment-10861</link>
		<dc:creator>rogerio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 23:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2241#comment-10861</guid>
		<description>There are several months and many hours i spend searching for this kind of information
Neil I want you to know that i am very happy. thanks thanks a lot. I am a little very little photographer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are several months and many hours i spend searching for this kind of information<br />
Neil I want you to know that i am very happy. thanks thanks a lot. I am a little very little photographer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zenon Cahr</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/09/balancing-flash-and-ambient-exposure/#comment-7406</link>
		<dc:creator>Zenon Cahr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2241#comment-7406</guid>
		<description>I read all of Niel&#039;s information on Tangents and purchased the On Camera Flash - Techniques for Digital Wedding &amp; Portrait Photography. I recently shot my first wedding and the ceremony was outdoors. I underexposed my ambient about 1 stop and compensated with the flash. You just have to trust that histogram, chimp and adjust as required when in TTL. The colors were very rich. I was within 1/2 stop of exposure adjustments during PP. 


This site and the book really helped me a lot. I thought the technical part was going to be hard but actually coordinating and posing people was far harder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read all of Niel&#8217;s information on Tangents and purchased the On Camera Flash &#8211; Techniques for Digital Wedding &amp; Portrait Photography. I recently shot my first wedding and the ceremony was outdoors. I underexposed my ambient about 1 stop and compensated with the flash. You just have to trust that histogram, chimp and adjust as required when in TTL. The colors were very rich. I was within 1/2 stop of exposure adjustments during PP. </p>
<p>This site and the book really helped me a lot. I thought the technical part was going to be hard but actually coordinating and posing people was far harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/09/balancing-flash-and-ambient-exposure/#comment-7147</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 03:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2241#comment-7147</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Tom, I usually add the focal length where it is important or relevant.  But I only sometimes add the focal length when it isn&#039;t of real consequence to the discussion ... and then only when I remember. But I&#039;ll make an effort.  Thanks.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Tom, I usually add the focal length where it is important or relevant.  But I only sometimes add the focal length when it isn&#8217;t of real consequence to the discussion &#8230; and then only when I remember. But I&#8217;ll make an effort.  Thanks.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomOnTheRoof</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/09/balancing-flash-and-ambient-exposure/#comment-7143</link>
		<dc:creator>TomOnTheRoof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2241#comment-7143</guid>
		<description>Neil, thanks for this brilliant article! I have a comment: it would be so nice to also have the focal lengths beside other camera settings...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil, thanks for this brilliant article! I have a comment: it would be so nice to also have the focal lengths beside other camera settings&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/09/balancing-flash-and-ambient-exposure/#comment-6275</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 04:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2241#comment-6275</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Alfredo .. at that point you will most likely not be able to use your histogram to check exposure.

To get correct manual flash exposure, you either need to:

1. &lt;a href=&quot;http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/&quot;&gt;check your histogram very specifically for a specific tone (white) , and how it is placed on the histogram&lt;/a&gt;, to the exclusion of any other brighter areas. 

2. use a flashmeter.  This is the simplest method.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Alfredo .. at that point you will most likely not be able to use your histogram to check exposure.</p>
<p>To get correct manual flash exposure, you either need to:</p>
<p>1. <a href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/2007/07/31/using-the-histogram-to-determine-exposure/">check your histogram very specifically for a specific tone (white) , and how it is placed on the histogram</a>, to the exclusion of any other brighter areas. </p>
<p>2. use a flashmeter.  This is the simplest method.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfredo Medina</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/02/09/balancing-flash-and-ambient-exposure/#comment-6268</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfredo Medina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents/?p=2241#comment-6268</guid>
		<description>Hi Neil,

On several occasions I have tried to balance ambient light with flash, underexposing a stop and added a manual flash, but then the histogram always shows underexposure. Is this normal or I&#039;m doing something wrong?
The conditions and settings are: Sunny Day, 1 / 250, ISO 200, manual flash 1/2 power.

Thanks again,

Alfredo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Neil,</p>
<p>On several occasions I have tried to balance ambient light with flash, underexposing a stop and added a manual flash, but then the histogram always shows underexposure. Is this normal or I&#8217;m doing something wrong?<br />
The conditions and settings are: Sunny Day, 1 / 250, ISO 200, manual flash 1/2 power.</p>
<p>Thanks again,</p>
<p>Alfredo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

