April 29, 2011

random found available light as portrait lighting

With the recent trip to California for the workshops, I was also keen to meet up with another favorite model, Bethany. We were allowed to shoot in a night-club on a Sunday afternoon when it was all quiet with no one there. It’s an interesting place to work with a beautiful model, finding interesting spots and then figuring out how I might adapt my flash setup. I had 4 speedlights with me and 2 softboxes and a slew of the new PocketWizards.

The first series of photos of Bethany however, was shot with just the available light there. But first I had to recognize the light as being interesting light for a portrait. I had to “see” it first. As it happened, I only saw that this might be useful light for a portrait when I did a few test shots while Bethany was having her hair and make-up done.

As photographers we should always be aware of the light, and how the interplay between light and shade affects our subject. And how the quality and color of light changes.

Sadly though, I didn’t recognize that the light was interesting just by looking at this scene. I only saw it once the test images popped up on the back of the camera, and I went hmmm!

Here is a pull-back shot a little bit later on, when Bethany was completely ready. The main light was simply that bare incandescent light-bulb which the make-up artist used to do Bethany’s make-up. Simple as that.

But the magic happened in how the warm Tungsten light worked with the much colder existing light within the night-club. I’m not sure what the other light source was, but it looks like it might be Daylight balanced light-sources in the night-club. Perhaps more blue / colder than that. Whatever it was, it looked great in that first few shots of Bethany’s prep.

When Bethany was ready, this is then where we started.

posing and directing a model

When working with hand-held video-light, we most often work by moving the light until it falls onto our subject in a way that is flattering. But with the single light-source now being static, I had to direct Bethany so that the light shining on her was flattering. It helps in that Bethany is an experienced model, being able to work with very little direction from the photographer. But she, like most models, will have no immediate idea what the photographer is attempting in terms of lighting. I did show her the test shots during prep, so she knew what I was after, but she still needed to be directed.

In posing her, I had her leaning into the light a bit, taking care that I got loop lighting. The way that the shadow falls  under her nose, means it is just that ‘loop’ of shadow there. It is most often the way that I use a hard or small light source. It keeps from weird shadows falling over your subject’s mouth, or a strong shadow of your subject’s nose falling across their cheek. So I tend to keep it simple like this, since it is usually the best place to start and get good results immediately.

Now it was just a matter of a few quiet instructions like, ‘drop your chin a little bit'; ‘turn your head slightly more to me’ … until the light looked good falling on her.

And there’s the result:

camera settings:  1/60 @ f2.8 @ 1000 ISO
Nikon D3;  Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 AF-S II (B&H)  … zoomed to 155mm

That was just the start of the photo session though. What I really was after was working with multiple speedlights in those interesting nooks in the night-club. But that’s for another article.

 

help support this website

 

{ 27 comments. } Add a Comment

1 Aniversari April 29, 2011 at 5:42 am

Amazing portraits and skin tone! The skin tone is influenced only by the white balance? Because in the pull-back shot the skin has a different temperature. The correct skin tone became a goal in my life, until now it’s more a guess for me.
Thank you.

Reply

2 Neil vN April 29, 2011 at 6:58 am

Since I shoot in RAW and use ACR / Bridge for the processing of the RAW file, my choice of Profile within ACR affects skin tone as well. I use the Camera Portrait profile.

Other than that, the skin tone is mostly about the light, and then the Color Balance / White Balance in editing the RAW file.

I do some retouching on these portraits, as described in the link in the article. As you noted, I didn’t take particular care with the edit of the pull-back shot in getting to the same white balance and look as the other main image.

Neil vN

Reply

3 Stephen April 29, 2011 at 8:27 am

Neil,
Excellent photos as always. I need to work on my visualization. My routine has been like “I think this is interesting.”, shoot a test shot, and then adjust without strongly considering how the lighting pattern will look beforehand.

Reply

4 Paulo Leonardo April 29, 2011 at 8:28 am

The shadow formed on the right side of her face causing a gradient going into clearer light was spectacular.

Reply

5 Chris April 29, 2011 at 12:55 pm

California was good to you Neil. I love how the cool blue backgrounds here contrast with the red hot backgrounds on the Ulorin series from the past week…talk about fire and ice!

Reply

6 Arturo S. Ramirez April 29, 2011 at 3:02 pm

Excellent. Yes indeed! How do you get the amazing skin tones? Is that something that you could share?

Thanks.

Arturo

Reply

7 Neil vN April 29, 2011 at 3:30 pm

Arturo, I just added my explanation in comment #2.

Neil vN

Reply

8 GWC April 29, 2011 at 4:02 pm

great post as always Neil! your blog is always part of my daily reading!

Reply

9 Alfred April 29, 2011 at 10:31 pm

Nice. That 70-200 is so sharp at F2.8 and 1/60.

Reply

10 Mike April 30, 2011 at 2:25 am

Hi Neil,

You mentioned that you use Camera Portrait Profile in ACR. I assume it is the Nikon version of the Portrait profile stored within the camera body you use?

Do you make any in-camera adjustments that you find helpful and time saving in post-processing?

For example, I personally keep white balance shifted to A3, for a slightly warmer AWB setting. I find that A3 tends to disable to “bluish” tone AWB sometimes creates. Since i shoot in RAW i always have a chance to adjust WB to my liking anyway, but on several occasions i found A3 to be just where i wanted it. Also, since i shoot with Canon, I make slight adjustments to the picture styles (for example: boosting saturation, contrast etc). For portrait profiles i found that a slight increase in saturation and A3 WB shift together with Canon’s P-Snapshot produces a nice combination.

Thank you!

Reply

11 Neil vN April 30, 2011 at 2:40 am

Mike .. I think you’re confusing Canon’s DPP and Nikon Capture NX software for the Adobe software, ACR (hosted in Bridge). ACR = Adobe Camera RAW.

None of the in-camera settings to the picture style, has any effect on how ACR develops the RAW file. So shifting the WB has no real effect, except for giving me a starting point with the WB “as shot” values.

Canon’s DPP and Nikon Capture NX are different in this regard. They show the in-camera settings in the RAW file. So with those two proprietary pieces of software, your in-camera settings will have an effect.

The Camera Portrait profile that I mention there, is one of the profiles built into ACR.

Neil vN

Reply

12 Alex-D April 30, 2011 at 3:04 am

Neil,
As usual a great portrait.I have a question.
The shadow on the right of Bethany’s face is so perfectly correct – not too light ,not too dark, and to my opinion is a real plus to this photograph, so how do you manage to get this ratio.do you measure with the flashmeter and what would the difference between the bright part of her face and the shadow part be ? a little less than 1 diaph ?
Thanks

Reply

13 Neil vN April 30, 2011 at 3:31 am

This is not studio photography where everything is under my control.

The point of this entire article is in the title “random found available light”. The point is that we should be on the look-out for, and be able to recognize when there is that moment of serendipity and we can use great available light. Instead of immediately storming off with flashes and softboxes in hand, there was the opportunity to use some interesting available light.

It was already there. But first, I just had to see it.

Neil vN

Reply

14 Alfredo Medina April 30, 2011 at 3:40 am

Hi Neil,

Can you give me the link to the article where you explain how you select / apply WB in ACR?

Alfredo,

Reply

15 Neil vN April 30, 2011 at 8:40 am
16 Adrian April 30, 2011 at 9:32 am

Wow, The final image of this set is just amazing, the motion the pose the perfect shapes of her arms at the edges of the frames, and don’t forget the lighting; very nice.

Reply

17 Mike April 30, 2011 at 12:44 pm

Thank you for clarifying my question Neil. I worked with DPP a lot and only recently changed to ACR. Thanks for the info!

Reply

18 Alfredo Medina April 30, 2011 at 4:48 pm

Hi Neil,

Thanks for your recommendation. I have just ordered from Amazon the first book on that list you sent.

Alfredo

Reply

19 Jonny April 30, 2011 at 6:31 pm

Beautiful shots as always Neil. I’m liking the work you have been publishing here recently with models, it’s interesting to see the difference between your wedding/portrait/model work.

My one comment on the first image (and I’m really not qualified to criticize!) would be that, knowing that you use the Portraiture plugin as part of your workflow, it seems that because it is using skin tones as a target for smoothing etc. it has evened out the skin of the model a lot more where the natural light falls on her as opposed to the cooler tones where the texture hasn’t been smoothed so much. I think in this image, as the difference in texture isn’t huge and the colour temperature of the light is different, it works but was curious if this was a conscious decision or not?

Reply

20 Neil vN April 30, 2011 at 7:04 pm

Jonny … I think you’re onto something there in how Portraiture works, and hence why the side with the blue tones show more texture. Definitely not a conscious decision, and I am actually only really aware of it now that you mention it. Interesting.

Neil vN

Reply

21 Trev April 30, 2011 at 9:26 pm

Portraiture works predominately on the reddish/yellow hue/saturation range since skin tones are invariable that colour.

Even if you use the eyedropper from the Skin Mask section on the left hand side of Portraiture, and clicked in the really bluish skin tones, nothing will change, even the blue background is ignored since Portraiture is trying to adjust the red/yellow hue range ignoring blues.

You can even adjust the area selected by placing your cursor in the skin mask range colour pallette and selecting either the sides or top/bottom of the white box and dragging them out, or in the little colour bar beneath the main colour box and expand/contract the range on the sides of the box.

Even if you grab the main box in the Skin Tones Mask area of the colour panel and slide it all over the place, you will see only reds/browns/yellow/light/grey, hue/saturation, no blues.

A simple test, in the Skin Tones Panel, next to the ON button there is a drop down menu, select Custom, then click on her forehead, you will see the tone selected in the colour panel. Just the one click.

Now, to see what’s only going to be affected, next to the main colour box where you see Show Mask, it will be default to None, select White and you will see your main image show the precise areas affected.

Go back to None, click on the red part of her cheek, next to the yellowy tones, but NOT in the blue tones, you will see the box expand in the colour panel to include that area also, check with Show Mask to White, then go back to the None and click anywhere else then on either the blues in her cheek or the blue background, nothing will change, it ignores the blues.

Hope this help explain how Portraiture works.

Cheers,
Trev

Reply

22 Neil vN April 30, 2011 at 9:32 pm

Trev .. thank you!

Neil vN

Reply

23 Aniversari May 2, 2011 at 5:57 am

Thank you, Neil. About the motion of model in the last photo and how to achieve that, I believe you’ll tell us in another wonderful post.

Reply

24 Ed Verosky May 2, 2011 at 9:23 pm

Really interesting about the Portraiture smoothing. I would have guessed it has a bit more to do with the angle of light coming in from that side, where texture is so deep that the software would have to slip into a much higher “gear” to get the same amount of smoothness. I don’t use that software, but it sounds great.

Reply

25 Neil vN May 3, 2011 at 1:46 am

Here is the article to explain the lighting and background in that final image.

Neil vN

Reply

26 Baart1980 December 22, 2013 at 6:59 am

Neil,
how you recognize the available light ? Only by looking at the scene with “naked eye” or by some test shots ?

Reply

27 Neil vN December 22, 2013 at 7:06 am

Both.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: