<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: exposure metering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/exposure-metering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents</link>
	<description>photography by Neil van Niekerk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:33:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/exposure-metering/#comment-34461</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 17:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/exposure-metering/#comment-34461</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;blho ... can you clarify whether your observation is with or without flash?  And with or without the flash switched on?  The flash changes things.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>blho &#8230; can you clarify whether your observation is with or without flash?  And with or without the flash switched on?  The flash changes things.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biho</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/exposure-metering/#comment-33996</link>
		<dc:creator>biho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/exposure-metering/#comment-33996</guid>
		<description>Thanks Neil for the great informative site. I have this situation that is confusing me. While keeping my meter unchanged; i.e f/5.6 1/80 s, I always get underexposed subjects(portraits) with matrix and center. However spot metering gives me the best results for the same setting and subject. Light is always evenly distributed when using spot metering.I use Nikon D5100 with SB700.
One last point (off topic?) the manual mode and aperture priority on the d5100 give different readings for the same subject(I use tripod). For example, in A the camera says that the right exposure is 1/200 at f/8 however when I dial these readings in M, the viewfinder meter reading tells me I am overexposed. I would be grateful for your input.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Neil for the great informative site. I have this situation that is confusing me. While keeping my meter unchanged; i.e f/5.6 1/80 s, I always get underexposed subjects(portraits) with matrix and center. However spot metering gives me the best results for the same setting and subject. Light is always evenly distributed when using spot metering.I use Nikon D5100 with SB700.<br />
One last point (off topic?) the manual mode and aperture priority on the d5100 give different readings for the same subject(I use tripod). For example, in A the camera says that the right exposure is 1/200 at f/8 however when I dial these readings in M, the viewfinder meter reading tells me I am overexposed. I would be grateful for your input.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/exposure-metering/#comment-20563</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 04:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/exposure-metering/#comment-20563</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You could do that, or simply just use your camera&#039;s built-in meter. 

No need to switch between exposure modes. Use the meter display (and interpret it), in the camera&#039;s manual metered mode. 

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You could do that, or simply just use your camera&#8217;s built-in meter. </p>
<p>No need to switch between exposure modes. Use the meter display (and interpret it), in the camera&#8217;s manual metered mode. </p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/exposure-metering/#comment-20562</link>
		<dc:creator>aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 04:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/exposure-metering/#comment-20562</guid>
		<description>Hi Neil,

I also had a question similiar to Lydia&#039;s , as I wasn&#039;t quite clarified on it.

&quot;Therefore I had to control my exposure – in this case by locking a relevant meter reading in manual mode.&quot;

For instance, I have a D700 Nikon. How would I go about taking a &quot;relevant meter reading in manual mode&quot; ? Would I switch to AV mode spot metering, press shutter halfway down on my targeted area and see what it&#039;s recommending?

Or do you simply mean to take a few exposures in manual shooting mode and preview the histograms based on being zoomed up in the area you want to properly expose for (similiar to your article on how to properly expose for a brides dress?)

any help would be greatly appreciated as I was not quite sure how to do this manual metering aside from the above.

Thanks a ton for all you do for us!

aj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Neil,</p>
<p>I also had a question similiar to Lydia&#8217;s , as I wasn&#8217;t quite clarified on it.</p>
<p>&#8220;Therefore I had to control my exposure – in this case by locking a relevant meter reading in manual mode.&#8221;</p>
<p>For instance, I have a D700 Nikon. How would I go about taking a &#8220;relevant meter reading in manual mode&#8221; ? Would I switch to AV mode spot metering, press shutter halfway down on my targeted area and see what it&#8217;s recommending?</p>
<p>Or do you simply mean to take a few exposures in manual shooting mode and preview the histograms based on being zoomed up in the area you want to properly expose for (similiar to your article on how to properly expose for a brides dress?)</p>
<p>any help would be greatly appreciated as I was not quite sure how to do this manual metering aside from the above.</p>
<p>Thanks a ton for all you do for us!</p>
<p>aj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flash photography essentials &#171; Neil vN &#8211; tangents</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/exposure-metering/#comment-10764</link>
		<dc:creator>flash photography essentials &#171; Neil vN &#8211; tangents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 22:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/exposure-metering/#comment-10764</guid>
		<description>[...] exposure metering [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] exposure metering [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: photography questions and answers (005) &#171; Neil vN &#8211; tangents</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/exposure-metering/#comment-10639</link>
		<dc:creator>photography questions and answers (005) &#171; Neil vN &#8211; tangents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 23:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/exposure-metering/#comment-10639</guid>
		<description>[...] exposure metering [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] exposure metering [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/exposure-metering/#comment-10401</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/exposure-metering/#comment-10401</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hi there Steve ... no, you don&#039;t change your settings.

Think about how someone with an incident light meter would&#039;ve done it - measured the light falling onto your subject.  This way the tonality of your subject doesn&#039;t influence the meter reading.  In fact, the tonality of your subject has no immediate bearing on how you use a handheld light meter. 

If the handheld incident lightmeter is calibrated for your camera&#039;s sensor / type of film ... then it is accurate.  You set those camera settings, and you&#039;re done.

Anything else you need to do to bring detail back the tones into the zones you like, is then done in post.  But your basic exposure settings remain unchanged for any specific light setup.

So who wins?  : ) 

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hi there Steve &#8230; no, you don&#8217;t change your settings.</p>
<p>Think about how someone with an incident light meter would&#8217;ve done it &#8211; measured the light falling onto your subject.  This way the tonality of your subject doesn&#8217;t influence the meter reading.  In fact, the tonality of your subject has no immediate bearing on how you use a handheld light meter. </p>
<p>If the handheld incident lightmeter is calibrated for your camera&#8217;s sensor / type of film &#8230; then it is accurate.  You set those camera settings, and you&#8217;re done.</p>
<p>Anything else you need to do to bring detail back the tones into the zones you like, is then done in post.  But your basic exposure settings remain unchanged for any specific light setup.</p>
<p>So who wins?  : ) </p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Vequist</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/exposure-metering/#comment-10388</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Vequist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/exposure-metering/#comment-10388</guid>
		<description>Neil,

Great book and blog. My wife (photographer) and I (second shooter) and I agree to disagree on an issue. If you spot meter on a brides dress (change exposure compensation to adjust the 18% grey) and you have consistant lighting from abmient and strobes, same location, same compensation but different individuals around her, such as formals. Dark tuxes from groomsmen then light dresses from bridesmaids. Would you need to change the exposure settings for different individuals around the bride to make up for the tones that are not included in the spot metering, or would you expect to have a correct exposure every shot since we are only considering the brides dress from spot metering.  Asthetics vs technical?

Thanks in advance,

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil,</p>
<p>Great book and blog. My wife (photographer) and I (second shooter) and I agree to disagree on an issue. If you spot meter on a brides dress (change exposure compensation to adjust the 18% grey) and you have consistant lighting from abmient and strobes, same location, same compensation but different individuals around her, such as formals. Dark tuxes from groomsmen then light dresses from bridesmaids. Would you need to change the exposure settings for different individuals around the bride to make up for the tones that are not included in the spot metering, or would you expect to have a correct exposure every shot since we are only considering the brides dress from spot metering.  Asthetics vs technical?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance,</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exposure metering for the bride &#38; the bride&#8217;s dress &#171; Neil vN &#8211; tangents</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/exposure-metering/#comment-10339</link>
		<dc:creator>exposure metering for the bride &#38; the bride&#8217;s dress &#171; Neil vN &#8211; tangents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 04:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/exposure-metering/#comment-10339</guid>
		<description>[...] exposure metering [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] exposure metering [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: photography questions and answers (004) &#171; Neil vN &#8211; tangents</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/exposure-metering/#comment-9939</link>
		<dc:creator>photography questions and answers (004) &#171; Neil vN &#8211; tangents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 22:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/exposure-metering/#comment-9939</guid>
		<description>[...] exposure metering [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] exposure metering [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

