![]()
exposure metering techniques
camera metering modes | exposure compensation | more articles on exposure metering
![]()
camera metering modes
The three metering modes offered on modern cameras are,
- center-weighted,
- evaluative / matrix metering,
- spot-metering.
In a broad sense, the choice of metering mode is often linked to which exposure mode you’re using. Essentially, the sophistication of matrix metering is ideal for when you’re relying on an automatic metering mode, whereas spot-metering is a metering mode which is used with more thought and specific intent – which most often implies manual exposure metering. (That said, I use manual metering mode nearly exclusively, and switch between any of the three metering choices dependent on the situation.)
With matrix metering, the picture area is divided into different sections, which are then metered with individual cells, and the exposure values evaluated and averaged out according to algorithms which are based on information gleaned from thousands of typical photo scenarios.
A simplistic example: if the top sections of the picture area (when viewed horizontally) are all much lighter than the bottom sections, then the matrix algorithm will ‘assume’ that the scene being photographed might be a landscape with lots of over-bright sky – and then would reduce the importance of the over-bright areas in the final exposure calculated. In other words, the matrix metering algorithm would then bias the exposure toward the bottom sections.
Yet, as sophisticated as matrix metering may be, it is still only a ‘guess’, and there are certain situations where the photographer will be able to make a better exposure than the camera’s automatic metering would.

As an example, let’s look at the photograph of the two men standing in the strip of sunlight again. With matrix metering, even though various sections of the scene would have been evaluated, the entire scene would have been taken into account in assessing the exposure – and the dark areas would still have affected the eventual exposure, and hence thrown the exposure settings off from what would have been ideal. A much more specific and consistent way to measure for a scene like that, would’ve been to take a selective meter reading – either with spot-metering off an appropriate area – or as was the case here, metering off another area which was similarly lit as the section I wanted to meter for.
Some magazine articles suggest that the photographer should use the spot-meter to measure off various areas and average it out to find the proper exposure. This may sound like a good idea, but is most likely unworkable in a real situation, requiring mental calculation by the photographer. Once again, a much better method in my opinion, would be to simply meter off an appropriate area as explained in the main Exposure Techniques page.
The choice between whether to use center-weighted or matrix metering is a more personal one. Some photographers claim to get more consistency with center-weighted metering because it is more predictable than matrix metering where the camera uses algorithms that we as photographers have no real insight to. I have found instances where I do prefer center-weighted metering over matrix metering, for example: when I am photographing a bride and groom, the vertical or horizontal framing positions the white dress or black tux differently in the frame, and my TTL flash is very inconsistent with matrix metering because of that. In cases like that, I switch over the center-weighted metering, and use exposure compensation to reduce or increase the flash a bit – but my TTL flash exposures are more predictable then.
Other than if you have a specific reason to use center-weighted metering, you’re probably better off generally using matrix metering in favour of center-weighted metering. So that really leaves a choice between two modes – when to use matrix metering and when to use spot-metering.
Matrix metering is a much better approximation than center-weighted metering, and will give great results, but thinking about what you want, will enable you to overcome a lot of situations where even matrix metering will be fooled.
photography books written by Neil vN
newsletter / forum / workshops & seminars
Stay informed of new articles via the monthly newsletter.
Also join us on the Tangents forum for further discussions.
If you need more direct help or instruction on flash photography,
I do present workshops & seminars and also offer individual tutoring sessions.
If you find these articles interesting and of value, then you can help by
using these affiliate links to order equipment & other goodies. Thank you!






Hi Neil,
i was wondering, do you advocate the use of incident meters instead of the in-camera meter? I am toying with the idea of renting one to see if I get more accurate results. Was wondering if you use one too.
Comment by Dana — August 14, 2009 @ 9:22 pm
Comment by Neil — August 15, 2009 @ 12:30 am
If i wanted to meter a sceene like one above with the guys on the roof, could we just zoom in get our reading in say centered weighted. Then zoom back out using the same readings for that zoomed in exposure?
Thanx, susan
Comment by susan — June 13, 2010 @ 10:40 pm
Comment by Neil vN — June 13, 2010 @ 10:42 pm
Would Susan’s suggestion also be accomplished by using spot metering without needing to zoom?
Comment by Mark — June 29, 2010 @ 11:41 am
Comment by Neil vN — June 29, 2010 @ 11:44 am
Neil, in the above sample picture, which area would be appropriate to spot meter and zero the needle ?
Comment by wiz — January 13, 2011 @ 3:40 am
Comment by Neil vN — January 13, 2011 @ 3:46 am
Then correct me if I’m wrong: I would meter off an area that is middle toned.. not too bright and not too dark. Maybe the area on which the two men are standing on? Seems medium gray to me. (It also depends on how much I can zoom)
Comment by wiz — January 13, 2011 @ 4:02 am
Comment by Neil vN — January 13, 2011 @ 4:24 am
Thanks for your patience Neil.
Although I noticed that the same questions are asked over and over again on different posts, you answer them each time. Hope you wont lose your patience with us any time soon.
Comment by wiz — January 13, 2011 @ 4:32 am
Comment by Neil vN — January 13, 2011 @ 4:35 am
Hi, Neil. I’m newbie in photography. I want ask about spot metering, spot metering is working with all AF points or with the center AF points only on canon 550d? Thanks Neil.
Comment by Justin — February 26, 2011 @ 9:28 am
Comment by Neil vN — February 28, 2011 @ 1:23 am
Could you have made a CW meter reading from the roof that is lit up, or is the area too small? Or maybe a spot meter from the brown part of the roof, is it not mid tone? Seems like mid tone from squinting my eyes, but it might have looked different from the way you captured it. Do you pre-visualize while shooting, or do you alter exposure in post, or both?
Comment by Indraneel — July 28, 2011 @ 1:39 am
Comment by Neil vN — July 30, 2011 @ 12:25 am
Niel
I’m unable to do much coz I can’t tear myself away from your amazing blog :)
I’ve got a question about spot metering…
lets say I’ve identified a scene I’d like to shoot, but the scene has a high DR.
could i spot meter my subject and expose correctly, then point my AF point to a highlight I intend on keeping in the frame, then use the meter reading to try and determine whether or not it will be blown out. if it is going to be blown out, adjust my exposure slightly to compensate, then repeat the process for a shadow area in my composition?
would this be a wise strategy or overkill?
Comment by Rodger — November 5, 2011 @ 5:07 am
You would also need to take into consideration if you have your camera setup for “back button focus” and to split the metering and focusing into 2 separate steps. Most have theirs setup to meter and focus in one step. You would have to focus, meter and recompose in the “2 men on roof” scene.
Sometimes focus and recompose throws off your focus if your DOF is too shallow and the angle change throws the focus point off once recomposed.
Comment by Stehen — March 4, 2012 @ 6:43 am