<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 03 &#8211; dragging the shutter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/3-dragging-the-shutter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents</link>
	<description>photography by Neil van Niekerk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:03:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Bond</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/3-dragging-the-shutter/#comment-39323</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/3-dragging-the-shutter/#comment-39323</guid>
		<description>ok thanks Niel, Also would you say to have the flash zoomed in? would this help to narrow the spread of light just onto the sbject rather than spread it across if it was zoomed out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok thanks Niel, Also would you say to have the flash zoomed in? would this help to narrow the spread of light just onto the sbject rather than spread it across if it was zoomed out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/3-dragging-the-shutter/#comment-39321</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/3-dragging-the-shutter/#comment-39321</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Tom, you would really have to do a few test shots without flash to see how the background registers. And then find your settings so that there is at least a hint of detail in the background. 

In a dark place, f5.6 and 400 ISO would be settings that would work against you. You ave to chase the higher ISOs and wider apertures .... and slower shutter speeds. 

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Tom, you would really have to do a few test shots without flash to see how the background registers. And then find your settings so that there is at least a hint of detail in the background. </p>
<p>In a dark place, f5.6 and 400 ISO would be settings that would work against you. You ave to chase the higher ISOs and wider apertures &#8230;. and slower shutter speeds. </p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Bond</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/3-dragging-the-shutter/#comment-39320</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/3-dragging-the-shutter/#comment-39320</guid>
		<description>Hi Niel, i take photos for a nightclub on a saturday night, it was my first week last week and was hoping for better results, i wanted to capture the lights in the club behind my subjects either in motion or just catch the rays spreading out, but i kept coming out with just dark backgrounds. I was using a flashgun in manual on around 1/16 and my camera setting were aout 1/20-1/50 shutter - 3.5-5.6 and iso from 400-1600, i&#039;ve used these setting before in a similar venue and got the background spot on but without using a flash. its a really dark club with a very low ceiling and its all painted black/dark green. Should i just drop my shutter speed to capture the lights behind maybe like 1&#039;&#039;- 1/4?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Niel, i take photos for a nightclub on a saturday night, it was my first week last week and was hoping for better results, i wanted to capture the lights in the club behind my subjects either in motion or just catch the rays spreading out, but i kept coming out with just dark backgrounds. I was using a flashgun in manual on around 1/16 and my camera setting were aout 1/20-1/50 shutter &#8211; 3.5-5.6 and iso from 400-1600, i&#8217;ve used these setting before in a similar venue and got the background spot on but without using a flash. its a really dark club with a very low ceiling and its all painted black/dark green. Should i just drop my shutter speed to capture the lights behind maybe like 1&#8221;- 1/4?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/3-dragging-the-shutter/#comment-34770</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 02:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/3-dragging-the-shutter/#comment-34770</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Ralph .. generally, the way the flash head is zoomed (wide / tele) is seen as something that affects flash &lt;strong&gt;power&lt;/strong&gt;. Similarly, adding diffusion material or some kind of other flash modifier, is seen as something you&#039;re doing to affect the flash&#039;s output - hence, the flash &lt;strong&gt;power&lt;/strong&gt;.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Ralph .. generally, the way the flash head is zoomed (wide / tele) is seen as something that affects flash <strong>power</strong>. Similarly, adding diffusion material or some kind of other flash modifier, is seen as something you&#8217;re doing to affect the flash&#8217;s output &#8211; hence, the flash <strong>power</strong>.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/3-dragging-the-shutter/#comment-34768</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 01:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/3-dragging-the-shutter/#comment-34768</guid>
		<description>Hi Neil,

Your blog is terrific and has compelled me to purchase your books, not just because of the great content, but also because of your generosity.

Another book I read listed the 4 controls of manual flash as aperture, ISO, distance, and flash zoom. So, if we also include &quot;power&quot; from your list above, does that mean there are actually 5 controls of manual flash?

Thank you!

Ralph</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Neil,</p>
<p>Your blog is terrific and has compelled me to purchase your books, not just because of the great content, but also because of your generosity.</p>
<p>Another book I read listed the 4 controls of manual flash as aperture, ISO, distance, and flash zoom. So, if we also include &#8220;power&#8221; from your list above, does that mean there are actually 5 controls of manual flash?</p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
<p>Ralph</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/3-dragging-the-shutter/#comment-27242</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/3-dragging-the-shutter/#comment-27242</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;David, without seeing the images, I will guess that your camera moved ... i.e., camera shake. &lt;a href=&quot;http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/10/05/faster-shutter-speeds-for-sharper-photos/&quot;&gt;1/60th is a slow shutter speed&lt;/a&gt;.

If the fringing is black, then it is most definitely due to the flash freezing some of the movement, and with your subject or your camera moving then.

A stofen doesn&#039;t soften the flash when you work outdoors, since the light source is still the same size as the bare flash-tube would&#039;ve been.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>David, without seeing the images, I will guess that your camera moved &#8230; i.e., camera shake. <a href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/2008/10/05/faster-shutter-speeds-for-sharper-photos/">1/60th is a slow shutter speed</a>.</p>
<p>If the fringing is black, then it is most definitely due to the flash freezing some of the movement, and with your subject or your camera moving then.</p>
<p>A stofen doesn&#8217;t soften the flash when you work outdoors, since the light source is still the same size as the bare flash-tube would&#8217;ve been.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/3-dragging-the-shutter/#comment-27230</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/3-dragging-the-shutter/#comment-27230</guid>
		<description>Hello Neil,  just found your blog , excellent. i have  a question regarding  a particular scenario at the weekend.A wedding ,very rushed group shots in overcast ( UK ) skies. Manual exposure , with flash /stofen hand held remote in front of and above the group as high as I could manage . Most shots were fine ,perhaps a little hot. Settings were around 1/60, f8, ISO800.
What we experienced was a weird fringing effect on the outer edges of the group ( group of 10 people in two rows), I have no idea what caused this ,  the people did looked a little cut out.

Very interesting note about use of stofen/ diffusers, I always was under the impression they softened the light never thought of using an open space to bounce from and certainly not with an open lens on the flash. Also good to see that on camera can be just as subtle ,hand holding is a nuisance and does stop you from keeping the camera steady.
Thanks David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Neil,  just found your blog , excellent. i have  a question regarding  a particular scenario at the weekend.A wedding ,very rushed group shots in overcast ( UK ) skies. Manual exposure , with flash /stofen hand held remote in front of and above the group as high as I could manage . Most shots were fine ,perhaps a little hot. Settings were around 1/60, f8, ISO800.<br />
What we experienced was a weird fringing effect on the outer edges of the group ( group of 10 people in two rows), I have no idea what caused this ,  the people did looked a little cut out.</p>
<p>Very interesting note about use of stofen/ diffusers, I always was under the impression they softened the light never thought of using an open space to bounce from and certainly not with an open lens on the flash. Also good to see that on camera can be just as subtle ,hand holding is a nuisance and does stop you from keeping the camera steady.<br />
Thanks David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/3-dragging-the-shutter/#comment-20653</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/3-dragging-the-shutter/#comment-20653</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Sort of ... but the phrases &#039;dragging the shutter&#039; and &#039;slow flash sync&#039; are usually used in different contexts. But the implication is the same - a slower shutter speed with flash.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Sort of &#8230; but the phrases &#8216;dragging the shutter&#8217; and &#8216;slow flash sync&#8217; are usually used in different contexts. But the implication is the same &#8211; a slower shutter speed with flash.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/3-dragging-the-shutter/#comment-20641</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/3-dragging-the-shutter/#comment-20641</guid>
		<description>Great post Neil. This is the same as slow sync flash, isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Neil. This is the same as slow sync flash, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/3-dragging-the-shutter/#comment-21345</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 01:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/3-dragging-the-shutter/#comment-21345</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;April .. flash will only freeze the action completely if the ambient light is 5 stops or more under-exposed. The closer your ambient exposure gets to being correct (at slow shutter speeds), the more it will register, and show motion blur regardless of flash. 

Related articles:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/08/19/shutter-speed-with-flash/&quot;&gt;Choice of shutter speed with flash&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://neilvn.com/tangents/2011/04/15/finding-something-to-bounce-your-flash-off/&quot;&gt;Finding something to bounce your flash off&lt;/a&gt; - read the comments from #11 onwards.

Re your question 2 about &lt;a href=&quot;http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/07/14/overpowering-hard-sun-with-flash/&quot;&gt;matching the sun with flash&lt;/a&gt;:
The basic technique here is to get your ambient exposure so that you don&#039;t lose detail (ie, clip).
This is best attempted at max flash sync speed and your lowest (base) ISO.
Then you find your aperture where you don&#039;t lose detail in your subject ... and expose your flash for that aperture. 

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>April .. flash will only freeze the action completely if the ambient light is 5 stops or more under-exposed. The closer your ambient exposure gets to being correct (at slow shutter speeds), the more it will register, and show motion blur regardless of flash. </p>
<p>Related articles:<br />
<a href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/08/19/shutter-speed-with-flash/">Choice of shutter speed with flash</a><br />
<a href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/2011/04/15/finding-something-to-bounce-your-flash-off/">Finding something to bounce your flash off</a> &#8211; read the comments from #11 onwards.</p>
<p>Re your question 2 about <a href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/07/14/overpowering-hard-sun-with-flash/">matching the sun with flash</a>:<br />
The basic technique here is to get your ambient exposure so that you don&#8217;t lose detail (ie, clip).<br />
This is best attempted at max flash sync speed and your lowest (base) ISO.<br />
Then you find your aperture where you don&#8217;t lose detail in your subject &#8230; and expose your flash for that aperture. </p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

