<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 07 &#8211; metering techniques</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/7-metering-techniques/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents</link>
	<description>photography by Neil van Niekerk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:03:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Eko</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/7-metering-techniques/#comment-32805</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Eko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 00:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/7-metering-techniques/#comment-32805</guid>
		<description>Neil,

I am trying to wrap my brain around what takes priority when choosibg settings outside.  I am doing a family portrait in the next couple of days,, but the weather has been severely overcast, so when I was taking some sample readings today (I believe the light conditions will be about the same) I was coming up with 1/250, f 8, iso 2000,  I am using a d700  with the 24-120 f4 lens.  I chose 1/250 because it is the max sync speed and also to help prevent camera shake,  I chose f8 because I want to make sure all the faces are in focus.  This left me with a rather high iso of 2000.  Do I have my priorities straight?  Would you perhaps drop shutter speed down so that the iso could come down a bit?  I don&#039;t really want to change the aperture much.  Too mant times I have had the frustrating result of having one family members face out of focus because my f-stop was too small.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil,</p>
<p>I am trying to wrap my brain around what takes priority when choosibg settings outside.  I am doing a family portrait in the next couple of days,, but the weather has been severely overcast, so when I was taking some sample readings today (I believe the light conditions will be about the same) I was coming up with 1/250, f 8, iso 2000,  I am using a d700  with the 24-120 f4 lens.  I chose 1/250 because it is the max sync speed and also to help prevent camera shake,  I chose f8 because I want to make sure all the faces are in focus.  This left me with a rather high iso of 2000.  Do I have my priorities straight?  Would you perhaps drop shutter speed down so that the iso could come down a bit?  I don&#8217;t really want to change the aperture much.  Too mant times I have had the frustrating result of having one family members face out of focus because my f-stop was too small.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/7-metering-techniques/#comment-30294</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/7-metering-techniques/#comment-30294</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Lulie ... just see for yourself how a well-exposed image looks on the back of your camera&#039;s screen when you&#039;re indoors in dim light, compared to stepping out in bright sunlight. 

While we often rely on the camera&#039;s preview, and often *have* to rely on it, the camera&#039;s preview isn&#039;t necessarily the best way to make a judgement on the image&#039;s exposure. 

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Lulie &#8230; just see for yourself how a well-exposed image looks on the back of your camera&#8217;s screen when you&#8217;re indoors in dim light, compared to stepping out in bright sunlight. </p>
<p>While we often rely on the camera&#8217;s preview, and often *have* to rely on it, the camera&#8217;s preview isn&#8217;t necessarily the best way to make a judgement on the image&#8217;s exposure. </p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lulie Tanett</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/7-metering-techniques/#comment-30293</link>
		<dc:creator>Lulie Tanett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/7-metering-techniques/#comment-30293</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; &quot;- checking the image on the LCD, (although this isn’t an accurate assessment of exposure)&quot;

Why wouldn&#039;t this be the most accurate assessment of exposure? Is there really that big a difference between viewing it on a small LCD compared to a big computer monitor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; &#8220;- checking the image on the LCD, (although this isn’t an accurate assessment of exposure)&#8221;</p>
<p>Why wouldn&#8217;t this be the most accurate assessment of exposure? Is there really that big a difference between viewing it on a small LCD compared to a big computer monitor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Sale</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/7-metering-techniques/#comment-29009</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Sale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/7-metering-techniques/#comment-29009</guid>
		<description>This is I think one of the most useful posts you have written (they are all good) but this is always a great starting point and one I often come back to. It&#039;s the foundation on which everything else follows. Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is I think one of the most useful posts you have written (they are all good) but this is always a great starting point and one I often come back to. It&#8217;s the foundation on which everything else follows. Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Woods</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/7-metering-techniques/#comment-28616</link>
		<dc:creator>John Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 18:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/7-metering-techniques/#comment-28616</guid>
		<description>I read that the location of your focus point while composing affects your ETTL metering.  I&#039;ve tried to replicate this, just spent the last 15 minutes taking pictures of my fireplace, and my results are inconclusive.  Does it make a difference to my ETTL metering whether I focus on the dark firepit or the light colored marble around it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read that the location of your focus point while composing affects your ETTL metering.  I&#8217;ve tried to replicate this, just spent the last 15 minutes taking pictures of my fireplace, and my results are inconclusive.  Does it make a difference to my ETTL metering whether I focus on the dark firepit or the light colored marble around it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/7-metering-techniques/#comment-27656</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 04:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/7-metering-techniques/#comment-27656</guid>
		<description>I used an external (as in not built-in) flash few weeks ago. With a few trial shots (the function was about to begin) I managed to get to a manual setting where i could adjust the shutter-speed and aperture by a stop or two to get variations in depth and exposure. 

I am now a fan of manual exposure :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used an external (as in not built-in) flash few weeks ago. With a few trial shots (the function was about to begin) I managed to get to a manual setting where i could adjust the shutter-speed and aperture by a stop or two to get variations in depth and exposure. </p>
<p>I am now a fan of manual exposure :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/7-metering-techniques/#comment-24668</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/7-metering-techniques/#comment-24668</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://chimping.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;chimping&lt;/a&gt;

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://chimping.com/" target="_blank">chimping</a></p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/7-metering-techniques/#comment-24652</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/7-metering-techniques/#comment-24652</guid>
		<description>Neil

You keep referring to &quot;Chimp&quot; or &quot;Chimping&quot;. Can you please explain this term. My apologies if I have missed something.

Cheers

Brad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil</p>
<p>You keep referring to &#8220;Chimp&#8221; or &#8220;Chimping&#8221;. Can you please explain this term. My apologies if I have missed something.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Brad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil vN</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/7-metering-techniques/#comment-22301</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil vN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 16:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/7-metering-techniques/#comment-22301</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Roy .. your best option is to &lt;a href=&quot;http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/07/16/using-a-neutral-density-nd-filter-with-flash/&quot;&gt;use a neutral density filter to get a shallow depth of field&lt;/a&gt;.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Roy .. your best option is to <a href="http://neilvn.com/tangents/2010/07/16/using-a-neutral-density-nd-filter-with-flash/">use a neutral density filter to get a shallow depth of field</a>.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Barnes</title>
		<link>http://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/7-metering-techniques/#comment-22277</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 11:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/7-metering-techniques/#comment-22277</guid>
		<description>Hi Neil
Quick question: I shoot with film (yeah - I&#039;m one of those that lives in the past!)and these days I only have access to 400 speed film.  Using the f/16 rule I&#039;d need to shoot at 500/s @ f/16....4000/s @ f/4.  Given that my camera has a synch speed of 125/s how can I - in setting my shutter/aperture manually - shoot at the synch speed AND retain a narrow depth of field?  Or it simply that I have to resort to using high-speed flash?

cheers Neil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Neil<br />
Quick question: I shoot with film (yeah &#8211; I&#8217;m one of those that lives in the past!)and these days I only have access to 400 speed film.  Using the f/16 rule I&#8217;d need to shoot at 500/s @ f/16&#8230;.4000/s @ f/4.  Given that my camera has a synch speed of 125/s how can I &#8211; in setting my shutter/aperture manually &#8211; shoot at the synch speed AND retain a narrow depth of field?  Or it simply that I have to resort to using high-speed flash?</p>
<p>cheers Neil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

