
(1/20th @ f2.8 @ 1250 iso)
using slow shutter speeds
I am frequently asked whether I use a tripod at all to help overcome the slow shutter speeds that I often shoot at. The question also often relates to shooting hand-held, below the arbitrary value of 1/60th of a second.
The choice of shutter speed at which you will get a sharp (enough) image will depend on a number of factors, such as how fast your subject is moving and at what angle compared to your camera, and whether you are panning with your subject. And also choice of lens, and camera’s sensor size, and your own ability to hold a camera steady. And luck. And also on how large you want to display the image.
I’m not going to attempt a broad explanation covering every possibility that we’ll encounter as photographers, but answer the question in terms of the work that I do – which is primarily as a portrait and wedding photographer here in New Jersey.
My own preference is for ‘sharp’. I like crisp images, and don’t much like too much motion blur. But this is a personal artistic choice. So I tend to shoot at higher shutter speeds where I can. Part of this is simply because I am not that steady in hand-holding a camera.
And in attaining higher shutter speeds, I tend to use fast optics, or shoot at higher iso settings. Or I just use flash at times to stop motion blur. But there are times when I am shooting in low light, and have to use a slow shutter speed …
Now I know this will aggravate many photographers, and perhaps rightly so .. but I rarely use a tripod. I have two of them that I constantly have in the car (okay, okay .. van) that I travel to shoots with. One of the tripods is a big beast, and the other a super-light carbon-fiber tripod. (Both are made by Manfrotto.)
For most of the photography work that I do, I find that my shooting style is too fast-paced for a tripod, and hampers the fluidity with which I want to work.
So as an alternate to using a tripod, I make do with:
- stabilized lenses,
- being careful in steadying myself, or
- purposely placing my subject such that they are shaded and will be lit by flash.
In this first example, which has appeared elsewhere on these pages:
The piano player is shaded compared to the brighter background. So he was mostly lit by flash .. and this would’ve frozen any camera shake. (The ultra-wide angle lens would also help mask camera shake in this instance.) Any noticeable camera shake would’ve been in the out-of-focus background. ie .. you’d never notice.

(1/15th @ f4 @ 800 iso)
In fact, I use this idea in how I very often specifically set people up in areas where they are shaded in comparison to the background. I then use the instantaneous burst of flash to freeze any noticable camera shake. This next image, an impromptu portrait of my friend Thomas, shows in part how I set out to manipulate such a scenario.

I deliberately positioned him in a darker part outside this venue, and then lit him with bounced flash. In this case, the shutter speed of 1/100th was fairly high, but the technique would’ve worked just as well at a much slower shutter speed – simply because the flash would’ve stopped any noticeable camera shake.
In this image – a candid photo of a mom and her daughter, the flower girl – I was shooting at a slow shutter speed, but knew that the low ambient light would barely register, and therefore flash would stop any camera shake. (The stabilized lens just clinched the deal.)

With this photo below, the background was lit by a (manual) Q-flash triggered with a radio slave, and the foreground is light from a bedside table lamp. To enable the tungsten light to spill enough light onto the bride for the camera to register, I had to use a slow shutter speed of 1/40th (@ f2.8). I controlled how bright my background is, by changing my ISO and aperture … and then I could control how bright the tungsten light would appear in relation to that, by riding my shutter speed.

The slow shutter speed here was possible because I used a stabilized lens. But I also ensured success by shooting a sequence of images. So part of my slow-shutter speed technique, is to make sure I take a series of shots.
Stabilized lenses are essential additions to any camera bag. It enables you to get sharp images under circumstances that would be difficult otherwise. With the image at the top of this posting, the slow shutter speed was just due to the low light levels – and the stabilized lens was crucial.
In this engagement session, I was able to get a slow enough shutter speed (1/20th @ f10) to get the New York taxi cabs to streak past. The stabilized lens was essential here.

Therefore attaining a usable image at a slow shutter speed, is not just down to a single thing that we could do - but a combination of techniques applied with some thought.
If you find these articles interesting and of value, then you can help by using
these affiliate links to order equipment & other goodies. Thank you!
Stay informed of new articles via the monthly newsletter.
Also join us on the Tangents forum for further discussions.
photography books by Neil vN
newsletter / forum / workshops & seminars
Stay informed of new articles via the monthly newsletter.
Also join us on the Tangents forum for further discussions.
If you need more direct help or instruction on flash photography,
I do present workshops & seminars and also offer individual tutoring sessions.
If you find these articles interesting and of value, then you can help by
using these affiliate links to order equipment & other goodies. Thank you!






Simple concepts- excellent execution. I was wondering how you seemed to get excellent contrast in the subject of your portraits with such a bright background. Filling the face with flash leaves the outline of the figure darker than the background, giving extremely sharp edges. Can you say, “Pop!” I’ll have to try this trick the next chance I get.
Gotta agree with you on that IS glass point. It’s worth the extra couple of pounds to keep the sharpness up to snuff.
Comment by Dan — February 22, 2008 @ 10:44 am
I know you’re using a canon system (at least one of it perhaps) and I see you using f2.8, however what I don’t know is what lens you’re using which has f2.8 and is also IS capable. I recently got a 24-70 2.8L and there’s not an IS version of it. (I would love to get a 2.8 w/ IS though esp for weddings)
AFAIK, the doesn’t seem to be any IS version of a lens w/ f.2.8. (And I highly doubt you’re using a f2.8 17-55 EF-S series)
Unless of course you’re using a prime lens.
Comment by lotso — February 22, 2008 @ 1:30 pm
More invaluable advice again! And for free!
You should charge for advice like this!!!
Comment by Rod Pascoe — February 22, 2008 @ 3:27 pm
Neil,
Thanks for the tips. You are a wealth of information.
Rob
Comment by r — February 22, 2008 @ 11:43 pm
thanks for all the knowledge you share. always very helpful and encouraging!
Comment by j.ro — February 24, 2008 @ 8:59 am
Thanks for sharing these great tips. :)
Comment by Jasmine Marie — February 26, 2008 @ 11:14 pm
lotso,
Canon makes a 70-200mm 2.8L IS, 300mm 2.8L IS and 400mm 2.8L IS.
Comment by Rob Pierce — February 29, 2008 @ 12:50 pm
IS is a plus, but if there isn’t a lens with IS, then just get a fast lens. You will still have more opportunities for low-light shooting.
I use Nikon and they also lack a VR (IS) for the 24-70mm range. I still ended up buying their 24-70 f2.8, just so I can have a fast lens for low-light opportunities.
Comment by Stephen — March 1, 2008 @ 7:53 pm
Very useful stuff. We can’t afford too many VR lenses, but have a useful manfrotto carbon fiber monopod that helps a lot with slow speeds. It can pretty much stay on the camera without getting in the way.
Comment by Phil Hibberd — March 6, 2008 @ 3:17 am
Neil thanks you ! As a wedding phototgrapher mainly black couples I struggled with exposure problem with the brides white dress and dark skin mainly outdoors. I read your tip on setting the shutter for my nikon to 250, ISO 100, f:8-11 and TTL -1 on my sb800. I got outstanding results and a lot of booking for 2008. Your tips are truly awesome.
Comment by Lee — March 27, 2008 @ 6:58 am
You truely are a flash god! Thanks for taking the time to provide these tips, i just bought my first flash and have learned so much just from reading your tips/tricks on here.
I will go and play now. Thanks!
Comment by Johnny C — August 23, 2008 @ 12:47 pm
Thanks for all the tips, I’ve never properly known how to use my flash, and your tips will be an amazing help.
Your photos are great.
Thanks again! :)
Comment by Caz — September 16, 2008 @ 7:33 am
On-camera flash had become a last resort for me. Thank you for teaching me new ways to enjoy it.
Comment by Happy Tinfoil Cat — October 20, 2008 @ 6:07 pm
Great thanks for refreshing info ;) It was useful and helpfull. Besides I found very handy manual zoom on my speedlite. Quite different effect using 105mm or 24mm. especially in “side” bounce. But of course its a little bit other opera :)
Comment by Herkus — December 3, 2008 @ 8:24 am
We get a lot of questions about flash in our classes – and I send students to this website frequently.
I see flash as a necessary evil and try to avoid it where possible.
Comment by Phil Hibberd — January 3, 2009 @ 8:17 am
Phil I don’t think that same attitude is going to be imparted on your students by sending them to this website.
I think the best way to sum it up for the majority of indoor portraiture and wedding photog, is a skillfully wielded flash is better than less than perfect natural light which is better than an ill used flash.
I have a long way to go before I get to the top rung of that ladder, but if I just stay satisfied with the middle rung, I’ll never get to the top. In order to skillfully wield a flash, I have to arm myself with as much info as possible, and shoot like an amateur. Some shots will work, others won’t. Either way I’m learning something each time I squeeze that shutter release.
The short of it is, if you view the use of flash as evil (necessary or otherwise), you’re never going to open yourself to the realisation that it in many cases, will compliment the available light, and take your “pure” pictures from good to outstanding.
Comment by JuzzyDee — March 17, 2009 @ 5:34 pm
Well, I thought I knew how to use flash 30+ years ago sporting a Nikon FM2 with a pair of Vivitar 283s with flash trigger sensors. Between Neil van Niekerk and Joe McNally’s web sites I think I just learned flash photography for the first time. And I don’t mean to be rude but I can’t believe anyone would snub flash use these days. I may not be a pro but when someone asks me for a photograph, I get it when they need it and not when the ambient light dictates. If I have to I use car head lights, flash lights, work lights, desk lamps, LEDs, mirrors or flash! Still learning after 30+ years!
Comment by Paul — May 13, 2009 @ 12:03 am
Awesome article! i’ve been trying to get the ambient light/flash combo down for a while now. i still have a question or two though.
First of all, when using, say, 1/30 SS for ambient light and then fire the flash, you’re saying that the subject is not going to be blurry and it will freeze the motion (providing it’s not excessive, i understand)?
Secondly, when you shoot this method and using the flash, are you using the fill light setting on the camera or full strength iTTL flash with EC as needed, meaning not a fill flash mode, etc.?
When you are taking pics in a church that allow flash and are using this method for the combo of light, where do you bounce off of if there’s really nowhere to bounce? i guess nowhere, right? lol….. so my question then would be are you using a diffuser with EC or fill flash with a diffuser, etc.?
And lastly, which diffuser/bounce thingie do you all find works the best? i know there’s the DembFlip and the LumiQuest and Sto-fen, Fong, etc., although it seems like those are pretty much like what comes with the nikon speedlites.
Any help from any of you is greatly appreciated!!
Thanks lots Ü
Comment by Gina — June 7, 2009 @ 2:44 am
Comment by Neil — June 7, 2009 @ 3:02 am
Hello Neil — to get their flash off-camera I’ve seen photographers handhold their flash with a SC28 or SC29 cord. They might still attach a diffuser of some kind to the flash, whether it’s the Black Foamie Thing, Demb Flip etc.
Curious to hear your take on this.
Thanks
Ernst
Comment by Ernst — June 7, 2009 @ 10:46 am
Comment by Neil — June 7, 2009 @ 1:59 pm
Neil, – I am trying to accomplish sort of the opposit of what you are doing and am not really succeeding at it. Perhaps you could offer guidance. I am wanting to photograph trains, trucks motorcycles etc. I want to do this when they are in motion. I want to use the flash to freeze the movement on the front of the vehicle in the hopes of bluring the back end to give that nice visual of motion. How should I set out to accomplish this at dusk? Aperture, shutter speed and flash strength as well as speed of vehicle would all help to nail this down. Can you point me in the right direction.
Comment by Chris Kingston — July 31, 2009 @ 3:03 pm
I enjoyed reading your articles they were eye openers.I never would have thought of bouncing over my shoulder or to the side. Thank you. Ray W
Comment by Ray Westfal — September 4, 2009 @ 7:01 pm
Chris Kingston…
If you are panning in the direction that the object is moving and you want the front to be sharp… I think you want to hit it with flash at the end of the exposure instead of the beginning when the flash “normally” goes off. To do this you will need to find the function for 2nd Curtain flash on your camera. Just be sure you aren’t going to blind the drivers who’s are are compensating for low light levels with a bright flash in their eyes. Aperture and shutter speed are then set based on level of ambient light… everything is keyed off of the “look” you want… so before you add flash set a shutter speed that gives you the look you want when you are panning… then add the flash to give you the frozen front at the end of the exposure.
Comment by George — October 21, 2010 @ 4:21 pm
Hi Neil,
I really don’t like resurrecting the (presumed) dead but I’m curious!
Are the taxis are going backwards because you paid them to do so or because your camera doesn’t have second curtain sync?
Thanks,
Ivan.
Comment by Ivan — January 12, 2012 @ 12:12 pm
Comment by Neil vN — January 12, 2012 @ 1:10 pm
Neil, many thanks for the response!
Mine was a “smart” comment that probably should have been smacked down so I doubly appreciate your serious response.
I’ve read a fair bit (most or all) of your site and am seriously impressed with the work that you do and the quality of the photographers that you work with. Kudos!
I’d love to get into wedding photography myself but I think that at age 45 the best that I can do is admire the efforts of people like yourself.
Kind regards and wishing you the best for 2012,
Ivan.
Comment by Ivan — January 13, 2012 @ 9:29 am
Ivan, don’t count yourself out at 45. I didn’t get into wedding photography seriously until my 40′s. If you love what you do, you will feel like a kid doing it because it’s so fun :-)
Comment by William Ng — January 14, 2012 @ 4:19 am
You purposely use a high iso, I read from other photographers that they always keep it low so do not get grainy images, How don’t you? Is it a higher class camera thing?
With limits to iso on other cameras can the images and these techniques still work well?
Comment by Allie — April 30, 2012 @ 6:17 pm
Comment by Neil vN — May 1, 2012 @ 2:36 am