The specialty of a macro lens is in allowing you much much closer to your subject than a normal optic would .. with the ease of continuous focusing from infinity to the closest distance. No need to screw in additional rings or lenses or reverse your lens. A macro lens works as a close-up lens, and as a more usual optic. And that’s the versatility of it.
hands-on review: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS lens
The main feature of the new macro lens is that it offers stabilization. Now this might not seem such a big deal to photographers who work with a tripod and photograph more static subjects – but the moment you want to shoot on the move, and play around fluently with your composition and angles – then using the lens hand-held becomes a huge advantage.
Instead of photographing the usual macro subjects – flowers and insects – I decided to test the Canon 100 mm f/2.8 IS macro lens (B&H), during a portrait session with a model, Annisa.
In the photo above, my settings were 1/200th @ f3.2 @ 400 ISO. In testing the lens with and without the IS enabled, there is a clear difference in the crispness of the (handheld) images. There’s no doubt that the IS works, and is a major improvement on the previous generation of this lens ..
Of course, I had to machine-gun the series of images to get a few images which were critically sharp. This is because the depth-of-field was minimal at f3.2 at such a relatively close focusing distance. If I merely breathed, or the model moved ever so slightly, the photograph would be out of focus. That I had to do this was no fault of this exemplary lens, but rather a by-product of the way that I chose to shoot – handheld. The stabilization will definitely help with camera shake, but won’t affect how sharp my subject appears due to subject movement .. or my own movement towards or away from my subject, however small a distance it might appear to be.
One more photograph of our model, but this time at 1/100th @ f4 @ 400 ISO
[ click on the photo for a larger image ]
… and it is super-sharp on her one eye, while in an enlarged view, her mouth goes gently out of focus at such a short focusing distance. Once again, the lens’ stabilization is without a doubt a huge boost here in the results you can achieve.
I used the Canon 7D camera (B&H) for this photo session. (A review on this camera will follow soon.)
Specifications:
Minimum focusing distance: 12″ / 0.31 meters
Filter size: 67mm (the older lens has a filter size of 58mm)
Weight: 1.38 lbs / 625g (ever so slightly heavier than the previous lens)
Length: 4.8″ / 123mm (a fraction longer than the previous lens)
Optical performance:
The optical performance of this lens is very impressive! This lens is sharp. Even at f2.8
The edge-to-edge sharpness is superb, as you’d expect from a macro lens.
auto-focus performance:
Theis updated lens focuses noticeably faster than its predecessor. Macro lenses have a tendency to be slow to focus because of the extreme range that it can focus – hence the focus / distance limiters – but this lens has a very firm response when you initiate auto-focus. Fast and assured.
Controls:
The lens offers the usual controls via the buttons on the left-hand side of the lens barrel:
- focusing ranges,
- auto focus / manual focus
- stabilization on / off
Final thoughts:
If you want / need a stellar macro lens for your Canon camera, and would also like it to double up as an effective portrait lens, then this is it! Optical performance is truly great, and the lens handles well and offers stabilization. This is as good as it gets.
If you are interested, this lens is available as a rental from LensProToGo,
or if you’d like to purchase this lens, it is available from B&H and Amazon:
Canon 100 mm f/2.8 IS macro lens (B&H)
If you find these articles interesting and of value, then you can help by using
these affiliate links to order equipment & other goodies. Thank you!
Stay informed of new articles via the monthly newsletter.
Also join us on the Tangents forum for further discussions.
photography books by Neil vN
newsletter / forum / workshops & seminars
Stay informed of new articles via the monthly newsletter.
Also join us on the Tangents forum for further discussions.
If you need more direct help or instruction on flash photography,
I do present workshops & seminars and also offer individual tutoring sessions.
If you find these articles interesting and of value, then you can help by
using these affiliate links to order equipment & other goodies. Thank you!
Neil – What is the border on edge of her face? Otherwise the sharpness of the image is impressive.
Comment by Jennifer Lynch — October 30, 2009 @ 8:44 pm
Comment by Neil — October 30, 2009 @ 9:02 pm
Minimum focusing distance is 12″, not 1″.
Comment by Eric — October 31, 2009 @ 1:29 am
Comment by Neil — October 31, 2009 @ 1:56 am
How would you say this compares to the 105 Nikon 2.8 VR Neil?
Rod
Comment by Rod Pascoe — October 31, 2009 @ 5:57 am
Comment by Neil — October 31, 2009 @ 9:29 am
Looking forward to the 7D review! The new 100mm looks stellar!
Comment by Rob — October 31, 2009 @ 2:10 pm
Neil, you said “If I merely breathed, or the model moved ever so slightly, the photograph would be out of focus.” I found (shooting insects, not beautiful models!) that using servo focus mode (how is it called for Nikon?) really helps: the continuous focusing usually keeps up with the small movements.
Marco
Comment by Marco Jona — November 4, 2009 @ 2:13 am
Comment by Neil — November 4, 2009 @ 12:11 pm
Hey Neil, thanks for posting the review.
When you are dealing with extremely narrow depth-of-field and you rapid-fire to raise the odds of a sharp image, do you typically auto or manually focus?
Cheers,
Chris.
Comment by Chris Ramsey — November 4, 2009 @ 2:58 pm
Comment by Neil — November 5, 2009 @ 3:10 am
traded my 135mm f/2 in for this lens. in all of my lens swaps over the years, i got this one right. great lens.
Comment by john — November 7, 2009 @ 12:11 pm
I experiment much with macro, although I use the non IS version of this lens. Maybe I will upgrade later.
What I normally need to do for getting super sharp focus to use live view and magnify about 5x. When I use auto focus or look in the viewfinder the pictures are rarely sharp.
Also I found that if I use auto focus and center focus on my 500d very often the camera will loose focus and hunt for a bit which is very annoying.
Anyone else had success with this technique?
I try as much as possible to use a tripod for my shots but this is of course very challenging since the angles are strange and the subjects are often moving.
Comment by Andreas — November 8, 2009 @ 9:22 am
Neil,
I don’t know if you have ever used the 135L by Canon, but what would you choose for a portrait lens.
f/2 vs 2.8+IS ?
Comment by Paul — November 10, 2009 @ 12:17 pm
Comment by Neil — November 10, 2009 @ 10:14 pm
Thanks, once again you are costing me money!
Comment by Sandy Edelstein — November 13, 2009 @ 12:23 am
I, too, bought the 100mm 2.8 L IS recently.
So far so good (it is almost as good as it gets. My understanding is – see http://tinyurl.com/y9ol7ht – that only its non-IS sibling (under €500,-); the 135mm F2.0 L (slightly more expensive); the 200mm F2.0 L IS (costs around €5.000,-); 300 F2.8 L IS (ca. €4.000,-) and EF 400 F2.8 L IS (ca. €8.000,-) are as sharp or (in the case of the much more expensive telelenses referred), very slightly sharper and Chromatic Aberration-free.
Speaking of the 70-200mm F2.8 IS, I’d been very dissatisfied with its optics (except for bokeh. Especially when used fully open) – and sold it before buying the 100mm Macro. I used to have a 70-200 F4 for a while – it was noticeably sharper and had better contrast than its faster, image-stabilised counterpart. But on the 40D the viewfinder was dark as hell – very difficult to focus with LiveView off; the lens wasn’t fast enough (particularly for frequent use under our climatic conditions), I lamented its lack of IS and I found its exterior design with a long and relatively thin barrel, somewhat unappealing.
I won’t buy the 70-200mm F2.8 (IS), or recommend it to anyone. I completely disagree with those who claim that a portrait lens needs not be sharp. I would be glad to elaborate on the subject, but I won’t digress too far…
Comment by Art Khachatrian — November 15, 2009 @ 6:36 am
Comment by Neil vN — August 19, 2010 @ 12:58 am
Hi Neil, would you recommend this lens over a canon 100 f2 or 85 1.8 for dimly lit wedding ceremony action. Using on a full frame camera and I’m thinking low light capabilites, bokeh etc. In your experience, is f2 or f1.8 too shallow for those situations?
Thanks for a great site!
Comment by Ciaran — November 16, 2010 @ 10:10 am
Comment by Neil vN — November 16, 2010 @ 1:57 pm
Great super sharp lens. Quick moview with iS in action on and Off heandheld, she is so hot
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CARvH4ntIQE
Comment by sebo2001 — March 2, 2011 @ 10:10 am
Hi Neil, I was just wondering… did you get round to putting your thoughts on the Canon 7D into words? I’m thinking of upgrading (from a 450D) and would be interested to hear your opinions.
Comment by Allen — March 19, 2011 @ 4:53 pm
Comment by Neil vN — March 19, 2011 @ 11:14 pm