
shooting in bright sunlight with flash
One of the most challenging lighting scenarios we’ll most likely encounter, is bright harsh sunlight. There are a couple of steps we can take to make things a lot easier for ourselves …
If we can move our subject so their back is to the sun, we can get away without using flash. We make sure our subject is not unevenly lit with sun, and then we just let the highlights blow out as a rim light.
further discussion with examples:
- taking photos under the mid-day sun
- photographing in hard sunlight, with or without flash
- shooting in bright sunlight (wedding)
If we can use flash (whether off-camera or only on-camera), we’d still ideally move our subject so that their back is to the sun, and make sure they aren’t half-lit by sun and half in shade. But even if we can’t move our subject, this easy algorithm is the best approach:
When using flash with bright daylight:
1.) use your lowest ISO
We don’t need 1600 ISO in bright sunlight, so take your ISO immediately down to 100 ISO or 200 ISO. If you really need the extreme depth-of-field of f22, then you can raise your ISO. You would risk image softness due to diffraction though. But that is the option.
2.) go to your camera’s max flash sync speed
There is a reason why we’d go to the maximum flash sync speed,
a.) and not lower (for then our aperture becomes smaller and our flash needs to give more output),
b.) and not (immediately) higher than max sync speed (for our flash loses power and range in high speed flash sync.)
3.) find the aperture
Ideally you’d use an aperture where you don’t lose important detail in your subject. But we don’t want to get too caught up in controlling all our highlights, for rim-light helps separate our subject from the background. So that controlled loss of detail where the highlights blow out, is a good thing. And also, sometimes we have to compromise and accept that some detail will be lost.
4.) now, for that ISO and aperture combination, dump as much flash as is required (or your flash is capable of).
The recipe is as simple as that. And it is an easy enough approach to keep things on track when battling under pressure in hard sunlight.
A couple of further notes:
If you find you have the flash range / energy / power to spare at max sync speed, and you’d like the shallower depth-of-field that high-speed flash sync (HSS) affords us, then by all means go to HSS mode. But it is a good idea to start at max flash sync speed if you’re unsure, because at max flash sync speed you have the most likely chance of success in adding flash to bright sunlight. If you can’t do it at max sync speed, you can’t do it at any other shutter speed.
Most often, when we’re working in the f11 region of apertures, and using a softbox or some light diffuser, then we’ll be at our flash’s maximum output. So then we’ll move our flash closer or further to give us correct exposure.
Using a light meter is the easiest and most sure way of getting right exposure of your flash. But, this isn’t an absolute. With the image at the top, I checked the back of the camera’s preview and estimated how close I need to move my softbox to my subject to get the correct exposure. I know, it’s strobist heresy.
Back to the image at the top:

My camera settings here: 1/200 @ f11 @ 100 ISO
Canon 5D mk II (B&H); Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS (B&H)
I wanted a dramatic wide-angle pose against the sky, including the sun. But I wanted to retain some detail in the sky, so I needed to add a lot of flash.
Now, I could’ve used direct off-camera flash to give dramatic light here in the sun. But I like the look that a softbox gives. But this means having flash with lots of power.
My usual kit when I need to shoot in this kind of situation, is the 600 Ws Profoto AcuteB 600R lighting kit (B&H) with 2×3 Profoto softbox such as with this photo session with Sarah and Mark. Using a speedlight with a softbox (and using only one baffle) is also an option in overpowering the sun with flash … but you have to work close-up to your subject. So the extra power of a larger unit does help.
This time though, I had an interesting lighting kit on hand that B&H had sent to me for review.
review: Impact LiteTrek 4.0 DC Monolight & Battery Pack Kit
![]() |
The Impact LiteTrek 4.0 DC Monolight & Battery Pack Kit (B&H), is a 400Ws monolight kit. So it has more than twice the amount of power of a speedlight. (There isn’t an easy way to translate Ws to the Guide Number.) In comparison the Quantum T flashes have a rating of 150 Ws. The Impact Lite Trek kit is priced attractively for a monolight kit. It comes with the head, the battery and the aluminum case. You’d still need to add a light-stand and a softbox. |
The softbox I used was the Impact 24×32 softbox (B&H). It’s a softbox. It is fairly easy to set up … as easy as it is to set up a softbox with the 4 rods and a speeding. Ultimately, a softbox is just a softbox. (Unless it is something as unusual as the Lastolite softboxes.) It works.
Interestingly, I also got to use the Impact Powersync 16 transmitter and receiver set (B&H). I really liked them in that they were compact, super-easy to use … and the price is attractive. (Currently, $95 for the receiver, and $65 for the transmitter. The combined set is $150)
The Impact Lite Trek kit doesn’t allow high-speed sync. It is at this point where the decision swivels around the need to balance the need for power that a monolight offers, with the possibility of buying a number of speedlights instead to give the additional power to match a monolight … but then have the capability of high-speed flash sync.
The Impact Lite Trek does offer a fast flash burst, giving a very short flash duration, just like a speedlight used at low power settings. But the Impact Lite Trek obviously gives off much more power than the speedlight. This mode isn’t useful outdoors or anywhere one shoots in bright light … but it would be useful if you’d shoot high-speed images in the studio. Droplets falling and apples exploding. That kind of thing.
The battery is rated to give 650 pops at maximum power. So this unit would work well on location, giving you enough juice to shoot for quite some time. Of course, a spare battery always makes sense.
The mount for the head is Bowens bayonet-mount compatible, so it is possible to expand this as a system.
Ease of use – it couldn’t be simpler. The controls and display just make sense.
Build quality isn’t of the standard of equipment like Profoto, but it is priced more attractively than such gear. It’s all in the balance.
And there it is – an affordably-priced medium-high power monolight unit for on-location shoots.
related articles:
- overpowering hard sunlight with flash
- overpowering the sun with flash (models: Sarah & Mark)
- photographing in hard sunlight, with or without flash
- using direct off-camera flash
- shooting in bright sunlight (wedding)
- taking photos under the mid-day sun
- max flash sync speed
- tutorial: high-speed flash sync
- off-camera fill-flash in bright sunlight
index of articles on flash photography techniques
If you find these articles interesting and of value, then you can help by using
these affiliate links to order equipment & other goodies. Thank you!
Stay informed of new articles via the monthly newsletter.
Also join us on the Tangents forum for further discussions.
photography books by Neil vN
newsletter / forum / workshops & seminars
Stay informed of new articles via the monthly newsletter.
Also join us on the Tangents forum for further discussions.
If you need more direct help or instruction on flash photography,
I do present workshops & seminars and also offer individual tutoring sessions.
If you find these articles interesting and of value, then you can help by
using these affiliate links to order equipment & other goodies. Thank you!









Neil,
A great article and a great photograph. Thanks for this article, since I was recently struggling this (even though it turned out to be a camera malfunction). I am definitely bookmarking this page as a reminder.
This article goes to show that a master photographer as yourself can work with almost any lighting accessory.
Alas, the Impact LiteTrek 4.0 DC Monolight & Battery Pack Kit is still really expensive for my tastes. I’d probably just get another speedlight and trigger for that price and try some multi-speedlight antics like Joe McNally.
Comment by Stephen — August 15, 2011 @ 9:20 pm
Hi Neil,
Did you use full power on that picture?
Thanks.
Comment by Eduardo B — August 15, 2011 @ 11:11 pm
Comment by Neil vN — August 15, 2011 @ 11:30 pm
Hi Neil,
Great work as usual. Just wondering if you had experimented using ND filters for your lenses? I shoot video as well and have found them to be extremely helpful when shooting in in the sun, and wanting to maintain a shallow depth of field, as you have to shoot at a shutter speed around 1/50 or 1/60.
I’ve used ND filters briefly for stills as well with some pretty great results.
Thanks.
Comment by Sanele — August 16, 2011 @ 12:58 am
Comment by Neil vN — August 16, 2011 @ 2:57 am
Sorry Neil…just to clarify… when we’re talking about ‘full power’ are we referring to the flash (say, the 580EX II) simply on TTL without any exposure compensation or are we using the flash with maximum exposure compensation dialed in?
Cheers
Roy
Comment by Roy Barnes — August 16, 2011 @ 4:47 am
Comment by Neil vN — August 16, 2011 @ 6:04 am
Wow!
Comment by Rich Poinvil — August 16, 2011 @ 8:17 am
Yep, good review. For the price though I think the best is an AB800 for $279 and their vagabond lithium battery for $239.
Comment by bill — August 16, 2011 @ 8:34 am
Thanks so much. I was wanting to revisit this topic after a somewhat fruitful but also somewhat confusing attempt at it.
Just working things through in my head with figures, if we go with the Sunny f/16 rule for ISO 100, aperture at the max sync speed of 1/250 would f/7.1. And then the flash power dump (most likely at full power given the demands).
Comment by Cameron — August 16, 2011 @ 12:12 pm
Neil,
I completely agreed w/ both approaches. Recently, with the combo of FlexTT5 + RC3 control + 580EX2, I’m in love with E-TTL approach where I always use the shallow DOF for portrait. It’s completely portable, fast, relatively cheap, consistent and lovely :). Hope you dont’ mind me sharing a few model shots I did for Sheila.
http://www.pbase.com/phi_tran/sheila
Enjoy your blog as always
Thanks
-Phil
Comment by phil — August 16, 2011 @ 12:41 pm
Neil, did you have sun flare issues. That is my worry shooting with the sun as a rim.
Comment by Doug — August 16, 2011 @ 7:11 pm
Comment by Neil vN — August 16, 2011 @ 9:51 pm
This continues to be the flat out greatest photography blog in the world. Thank you for providing all of this valuable information Neil. It’s priceless.
Comment by Tom K. — August 17, 2011 @ 1:03 am
Interesting kit (and great results as usual, Neil).
However, I’m not sure what advantages you get from a kit like this over, say, a PCB Einstein @ $499 and a Vagabond Mini @ $239. This would give you more power (400Ws vs 640Ws, or 2/3 stop more light). Add a second battery for the Vagabond Mini (@ $90), and you’ll get 800-1000 full-power pops of on-location lighting. Going with an AB1600 brings the total price down by $140 (though you lose some colour accuracy at low power, and your flash durations go up).
Not saying this is not a great kit; it surely is, and obviously the results speak for themselves. And clearly this is a better value than buying multiple Speedlites @ $500 each (though, as you say, you lose HSS…though ND filters are likely a more efficient way of getting to wider f/stops). Just saying that the kit seems a smidgen overpriced for what you get. At $650, this would be a winner. At $800, I’d just as soon opt for the PCB kit, and give up the uber-cool looking carry case.
Comment by Mike — August 17, 2011 @ 9:29 am
Comment by Neil vN — August 17, 2011 @ 1:00 pm
The easiest thing to do on a shoestring budget is to get one of them Lastolite reflectors. Easy to set up (or hold if one’s alone (happens :-) )) easy to visualize the effect or the look you’re after. I love them.
The shots like the one you did is a bit trickier with a reflector but any kind of cross-lighting, normal 45deg-ish and fill are actually pretty simple to set up.
I found reflectors to be one of the easiest, most intuitive ways to learn off-camera lighting… but that’s just me…
Nice shot BTW :-)
Cheers!
Bogdan
Comment by Bogdan — August 17, 2011 @ 2:43 pm
yeah right, good luck trying to use reflector in this harsh condition without blinding your model, buddy. Reflector is useful only in the shade and away from the intentional sun flare. Walk before talk!
Comment by phil — August 18, 2011 @ 3:23 am
Comment by Neil vN — August 18, 2011 @ 3:38 am
You CAN hold the reflector higher without blinding anyone. The tricky part is to balance the exposure properly as the backlight will be more powerful obviously in THAT particular setup. If you cross light you can turn your model to face anywhere and do it pretty much anywhere shade or not. You can’t overpower the sun with a reflector obviously, but that does not mean you can’t use it.
And yes I did walk that line…
Cheers!
And peace!
Comment by Bogdan — August 18, 2011 @ 5:00 pm
Hi Neil,
Beautiful photograph, but your opening paragraph threw me for a real loop!
If we can move our subject so their back is to the sun, we can get away without using flash. We make sure our subject is not unevenly lit with sun, and then we just let the highlights blow out as a rim light.}
This goes “against” one of the “rules” I have always been taught about keeping MY back to the sun. I understand this can cause some harsh light and squinting but I thought you never wanted to be photographing into the sun
Would this photograph been a silhouette without flash? where is the sun in relation to your model, is it behind directly behind her or high in the sky near the top of the photographs?
Thanks!!
Comment by Will Condon — August 18, 2011 @ 6:33 pm
Comment by Neil vN — August 18, 2011 @ 10:53 pm
I`ve been following you a couple of years now and I must say I`m impressed, not only by your photos but also your ability to write and explain so that others can understand your techniques. Keep up the good work mate! :)
Thanks to this blog, a couple of books, good equipment and a lot of trying and failing, I now feel that I have ok control when shooting portraits (which is my main area). I mostly get things the way I want when it comes to the techincal part, but I wonder how you communicate with your subject when this is just “another girl” and not a professional model.
I mostly take pictures of friends and family to get some more experience, but I struggle to get that natural, smiling, great looking expression on their face. My clients often say something like “Ok, just tell me where you want me”. I place them where I want and then gives them a couple of poses we can try, but then I “lose it”.
How do you get the talk going so that you get those great, natural smiles?
Comment by Dag — August 19, 2011 @ 4:18 pm
Comment by Neil vN — August 22, 2011 @ 4:08 pm
Hi Neil, jy het ‘n paar fans hier is SA ook. Julle is so gelukkig om al die regte tools te kan kry teen goeie pryse. Ek het nou die dag ‘n hele Quantum-stelsel vanaf B&H bestel en saam met posgeld het dit my so R20k gekos! Keep up all the good work and keep us inspired here in SA.
BHendrik
Comment by Hendrik — August 23, 2011 @ 9:21 am
Thank you for your article(s). I have read several of them, and have purchased your books. I appreciate the way you explain things in a language that I can understand. You most definetly have contributed to my learning experience, and have made it more fun for me just because you make it so easy to understand. THANK YOU!! Teresa
Comment by Teresa Arthur — August 23, 2011 @ 10:31 am
great photos i really love your work , i have purchased your book on camera flash techniques found it really useful i think iam getting much better at mastering flash now after reading your book so thank you
Comment by paul — August 29, 2011 @ 5:43 am
Nice job! I was wondering, can this set up be used with Pocket Wizards?
Comment by Robert — August 29, 2011 @ 7:20 am
Comment by Neil vN — August 29, 2011 @ 7:25 am
Thanks Neil!
Comment by Robert — August 29, 2011 @ 8:55 pm
hello neil..i would like to ask several question about the Impact Litetrek..i did some research on it, it has several aliases such as Phottix PPL-400, FlashPro, Strobeam DL4, cononmark, Photoflex TritonFlash..
and some of the user reviews on the net (flickr discussions, strobist.com, other forums) reported the drop of performance above 1/60th..how do u find the performance though when working with this unit since u didn’t mention it in your review?
i’m currently looking for a portable studio strobe for outdoor use..too bad in my country, there is no alienbees, einstein, lencarta safari, etc..we only have china brands like Jinbei, Phottix and so on..Profoto, Bowens, Quantum Flash is way out of my budget though..
so i would appreciate your feedback on this unit (in my country its called Phottix PPL-400)
Comment by adi marwan — October 19, 2011 @ 11:23 am
Comment by Neil vN — October 19, 2011 @ 11:38 am
unfortunately, einstein/alienbees is not available in my country..
anyway, thank you for your feedback..appreciate it..
by the way, I LOVE YOUR SITE..teaches me everything that i wanted..You sir are a great teacher..love your in-depth explanation..it is understandable even for kids..keep up the good work sir..You are my idol! =)
regards
adi
Comment by adi marwan — October 19, 2011 @ 1:26 pm