syncing at higher than max flash sync speed
I never paid much attention to the physics and shape of the pulse of flash, or how the pulse of light is shaped, but after reading up on how the new PocketWizards work, I was curious .. and played around with the Q-flash. And to my surprise, I found I was able to shoot at much-higher-than-sync speed with the Q-flash when I am using it at full power. So I had to delve further into this.
Now, the usual short-hand description of the way the flash pulse is dissipated, is as a near-instantaneous burst of light. But the reality of it is that there is a specific rise time to the pulse, and also a specific way the light decays from the moment the flash is fired. This decay in the light pulse becomes slower for certain flashguns (mostly non-studio flashguns), as the flash is fired at higher power settings.
This becomes essential knowledge once you delve into the realm of action-stopping flash, but for most of us as wedding and portrait photographers, it is immaterial.
Going back to the image I posted a few days ago ..

The model, Aleona, was lit with an off-camera Q-flash T5D-R, using Quantum’s wireless system, and a 24×32 softbox on a lightstand.
The settings were: 1/1000th @ f4 @ 200 ISO
and a few of regular visitors to this blog caught that I shot this at 1/1000th of a second with a Q-flash .. and they don’t support high-speed sync (yet).
Here are a few test shots to show what happens at various shutter speeds with the T5D-R Q-flash either at full power or at 1/8th power, while going over the maximum flash sync speed of 1/250th for this camera. (Nikon D3)
At 1/500th of a second at 1/8th power (@ f2.8), you get the expected nearly black frame as the one shutter curtain obscures the flash exposure:

But the moment I went to full power on the Q-flash while still at 1/500th, I got this:

Flash exposure across the frame! But very uneven. The bottom part clearly has more light than the top half
Going up all the way to 1/1000th of a second:

The flash exposure seems now a little more even across the frame, although there is a noticeable darkening of the image at the top.
In trying to figure out the physical reasons for this, I found these helpful webpages ..
http://www.sportsshooter.com/news/1888
http://www.paulcbuff.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=59
http://www.scantips.com/speed2.html
http://www.flickr.com/groups/strobist/discuss/72157618877229864/
.. and here is what I surmise is happening:
(and I would love to hear corrections or fine-tunings of my understanding of this.)
Looking at the flash pulse duration,

The flash duration is usually described in terms of how long it takes for 50% of the flash power to have been released .. this is the t.5 period. But that whole time there where the flash more slowly releases some of its juice, is measured as the period until only 10% of the power of the flashtube remains to be dissipated.
So here is how I’ve figured out what is happening with the Q-flash:
Checking with Quantum’s technical dept, they told me that the flash duration is as slow as 1/300th of a second at full power.
At 1/2 power it increases to 1/700th of a second, and at 1/4 power 1/1300th of a second. At 1/8th power, the flash duration is as short as 1/2400th of a second.
So while we remain below max sync speed, we get to see most of the flash exposure register on the frame. All is good, and life is how we understand it. The moment we go over max sync speed (at less than max power), then we see the shutter curtain. This still makes sense.
But once we hit full power, the flash duration is so long, that at a high shutter speed, we hit the back end of that pulse .. I surmise somewhere between the t.5 and t.1 time. This then means we get flash exposure across the frame … but since the flash power is declining as the shutter curtain moves across the frame, we get that uneven exposure.
And I suspect it is more noticable at 1/500th, because then we’re probably hitting the flash pulse closer to the t.5 spot.
So there you have it … I was able to shoot at a much higher shutter speed with the non-HSS Q-flash .. simply because the flash duration is so slow at full power. Of course there is a huge loss in effective exposure .. but I was able to sort-of-sync at a shutter speed higher than max flash sync speed.
I don’t really see a practical application for this in terms of action freezing, because the difference between 1/250th and 1/300th is marginal. Where this might be used is if you need to use a shallow depth-of-field and can sacrifice the loss of power. In the photo above, I didn’t really need f4 and in a more serious shoot, I’d be in the region of 1/250th @ f8 and using less flash power for the same results. But I thought this was an interesting bit of exploration. It certainly helped my understanding of how flash works.
I would love to hear comments on this, and any corrections to my understanding of what is happening here.
![]()
If you found this and other articles valuable, then using these affiliate links to order equipment & any other goodies, would be a welcome way of helping towards the cost of hosting this site.
Thank you!
![]()


Neil,
How are you triggering the Quantum specifically?
The trouble with this technique on most cameras is usually that the pc port doesn’t fire until the first curtain is fully open, which is too late, because the second curtain is already partly closed. The new pocket wizards get around this by sensing pre-flash communication, and allow you to adjust the timing. Another way is to set an on-camera flash to High Speed Sync, so that it will start firing before the first curtain opens, and use it to optically trigger the big flash.
These t.1 times vary widely by manufacturer, and many (most?) usually advertise their t.5 times (to be more impressive).
The typical speedlight fully charges the capacitor, and regulates power by cutting short the flash, so low power means very short flash pulse, useful for freezing hummingbirds etc.
The typical studio strobe does the opposite – for 1/4 power, it charges the capacitor to 1/4 . The lower voltage on the capacitor means that current takes longer to get flowing, so lower power means somewhat longer flash pulse – maybe not as pronouced an effect.
At least this is my limited understanding.
David Graham
Comment by Dave Graham — June 26, 2009 @ 8:51 pm
Comment by Neil — June 27, 2009 @ 2:36 pm
Hi Neil , that all sounds pretty logical .
On a side note according to my calculations high fp mode on a SB800 drops the power to around 27% [ 2.7m as opposed to 1.4 m ] .
My D40 with its 1/500th synch speed and electronic shutter allows me to get the same distance throughout the range at 4m working distance with an SB24 . http://realsynch.blogspot.com/ .
At F4 1/3200th sec iso 200 it catches most of 1/4 power from my SB24 giving me the same working distance as an SB800 at normal synch speed – except for the fact that the 1/500th synch speed gives me 2.5 times the effective power as well -compared to 1/200th synch speed . This gives me close to 8X the power of an SB800 at 1/3200th sec [ 1.4m as opposed to 4m ] – in practice it is around 2.7 stops more power .
Of course that’s nothing to do with your tests and a focal plane shutter but high -fp mode is a continuous light that gives the same distance with equivalent aperture and shutter speed changes – maybe if they used a smaller flash bulb it would be a slower release for the same power output which would be useful for ‘trick modes’ as in your experiments . I suppose if there was a way to do it better they would have done it by now :) … perhaps if they made more electronically switched shutters it would be better for flash in sunlight .
Comment by Desmond — June 28, 2009 @ 4:24 am
Neil
i just test it out with canon 40d and t5d-r, i tried it with pc port direct connection or trigger by pocket wizard plus II. i got no luck to get pass 1/500 with full power of my quantum. maybe the freewire is the trick?
Comment by Tim Wong — June 30, 2009 @ 12:34 pm
Ooopsss. Sorry, after reading a bit more and notice that I need to change my Vivitars. But looking at the prices it also seems i need to work more. I guess I will keep shooting and change to at least two SB900′s.
Thanks Neil
Comment by Antonio — July 2, 2009 @ 10:09 pm
Cool this is all very interesting and new territory. Should lead to some great photography!
Regards
Brian Carey
Comment by Brian Carey — August 9, 2010 @ 9:33 am