This web article was first posted in April ’06 on the DWF, as a tongue-in-cheek reaction – or caustic response then, if you will – against the numerous articles and seminars where we photographers are urged to just look for the light.
What triggered me to write this article in the first place, was that there seems to be a trend where use of flash is disdained in favor of only using available light.
As if it is always that simple.(This article was also published in the Sept ’06 issue of Rangefinder magazine.)
![]()
Finding the light …
I’ve been so inspired recently by the various photographers at seminars and magazine articles, telling everyone to just look for the light and to find the light.
So many photographers just use available light, and make the rest of us who aren’t blessed with perfect light like they have in la-la-land, feel so inadequate. It is our failing as photographers if we can’t find the light and use it properly.
I felt I had to rise up to this and push myself as a photographer, and just look for the light. It is there to be found! Inspired like that, I approached this very colorful Hindu ceremony (April 2006), with a fresh mindset …
The temple itself is beautiful and imposing from the outside, in a blocky New Jersey kinda way.

.
The late afternoon light was incredibly harsh, and I knew I had to do something here so that my portraits wouldn’t look like the few candids I had to shoot outside in the sun. So for the portraits, I moved the bride (and others) into the open shade between the pillars in the front. The strong vertical lines behind them helped to make the simple portraits more striking.

Speaking of striking – isn’t she an incredibly beautiful bride?
.
Well, I was happy at this point. I was able to get lovely portraits using the light and the setting … but walking inside of the room where the guests were going to dance, my heart sank.
The ceiling was high, with only fluorescent lights, which meant the light was top-heavy and dim.

Light levels were low – 1/60th @ f2.8 @ 1600 iso.
Hmmm .. just not enough to stop action. And the client wouldn’t be too happy with hundreds of impressionistic color smears for photographs.
But .. I just had to look for the light.
Nevermind that this is a dimly-lit New Jersey room, and not a brightly lit la-la-land venue.
This would be MY failing for not looking for the light,
and finding the light,
and finally .. getting to USE the light.
I scoured the place … and .. sure enough .. there it was .. light!


But .. was it available light?
I looked around .. and sure .. no one else was using it.
It was available! I could use the light!
I saw it and found it, and now I could use it! 
And boy! Am I impressed! Just look at the light! Look at the colors pop!
People were dancing around me, and I could stop the action if I chose to, and have faces recognizable. The bride would be able to recognize herself and her friends and family.





.
So, a genuine thank you to everyone here who inspired me so to rise above my own inadequacies as a photographer, and just frikkin LOOK for the light. 
Thank you, thank you, thank you.
Neil van Niekerk
![]()
technical info:
The additional strobes that I put up in the corners of the room, were Quantum T2 strobes. They were powered by Quantum 2×2 batteries, and triggered by Quantum 4i radio slaves. The stands are Red-Wing stands. These strobes were run in manual mode, and at 2/3rd stops down from full output, to ensure consistency in exposures in faster sequences of shots.
I also used an on-camera flash which was turned around and slightly bent backwards, with a Stofen with the top cut open. This meant that most of the light from my on-camera strobe was thrown upwards and slightly back .. but because of the Stofen, enough light spilled forward, to ensure there were no raccoon eyes, and that the lighting was as even as I could make it under the circumstances.
Exposure info .. all shots at 1/125th, and 800 iso.
The aperture varied between f4 and f5.0
I dialed the flash exposure compensation down in certain areas of the room.
The on-camera flash exposure was varied from +0.3 to -1.0 EV.
The on-camera strobe was in TTL mode.
![]()
More articles on off-camera flash …
![]()
If you find these articles interesting and of value, then you can help by using
these affiliate links to order equipment & other goodies. Thank you!
Stay informed of new articles via the monthly newsletter.
Also join us on the Tangents forum for further discussions.
![]()




So freakin’ funny. Love it! Thank you.
CA
Comment by Cory Ann Ellis — September 12, 2007 @ 3:23 am
Very well done. The strobes provide pleasant soft ambient light, even with this difficult, highly reflective floor.
Comment by david — September 30, 2007 @ 11:50 pm
very good photographs special indian people photographs
sharad
Comment by sharad — October 19, 2007 @ 4:43 am
Wow, you solved that problem just perfect. But I’m wondering how these strobes where strong enough to give you enough light, considering the large room? Or are the pictures you show mainly lit by the on-camera flash?
Comment by Serge — October 21, 2007 @ 5:55 am
Comment by Neil — October 21, 2007 @ 7:12 am
Neil,
Thank you for a good laugh first thing in the morning!!!!!!
Your work is inspirational..
Brian
Comment by Brian — November 16, 2007 @ 8:48 am
Great work ! Outstanding. Very inspirational. Very innovative.
I’m wondering what the attendees thought of the strobes going off while they were dancing, every time you took a shot. Did they find it disrupting ? The whole room got lit up, right ? Did they complain ?
Thanks for sharing this.
Comment by Someguy... — December 19, 2007 @ 12:25 pm
Comment by Neil — December 20, 2007 @ 11:10 pm
Neil,
This is great – I liked the terminator look, so have managed to fit my camera with all sorts of weird and wonderful brackets: it is great if you want to take pictures of people looking confused or scared.
Fancy doing a course in London?
Comment by Justin — December 24, 2007 @ 12:01 pm
Neil – maybe a dumb question – but why did you not need 2 strobes on the other side of the dance floor? Isn’t the light more intense near the source and trails off way across the floor?
Thanks,
Rob
Comment by Rob Oresteen — January 26, 2008 @ 8:20 pm
Comment by Neil — January 27, 2008 @ 12:12 am
Dear Neil,
Can you please explain how did you setup the remote strobes to trigger thru the wireless, while your on camera flash was in the TTL mode. Its my understanding that when on camera flash is in TTL mode it emits pre flashes, this pre flashes results in the pre-mature triggering of the remote flash whether its optically triggered or thru radio wirelss. Please elaborate on how to use this combination of on camera ttl with remote flashes (I know Nikon CLS flashes can do that bit you did not use it).
Thanks for your input..
Singh
Comment by Singh — February 11, 2008 @ 9:03 pm
Dear Singh, you missed this:
“The additional strobes that I put up in the corners of the room, were Quantum T2 strobes. They were powered by Quantum 2×2 batteries, and triggered by Quantum 4i radio slaves”.
They triggered by Quantum 41 radio slaves, so pre flashes won’t affect them.
IMHO
Comment by Very Wirawan — February 17, 2008 @ 4:02 am
Neil mentioned “The on-camera strobe was in TTL mode.”
I am still sure the on camera strobe in TTL mode will emit preflash, and even if the remote quantum flashes are triggered by 4i radio slaves the pre-flash may result in pre-matured triggering of the remote flashes. (I have Nikon strobe and it does emit pre-flash in iTTL mode, that causes remote trigger to fire early)
Neil, can you please describe the actual settings of the on camera and remote strobes and their mode and connection settings in detail.
Thanks for your detailed articles. These shots were really beautiful.
Singh
Comment by Singh — February 18, 2008 @ 11:29 pm
Comment by Neil — March 11, 2008 @ 11:07 pm
Neil,
What would have been the best approach/technique if you had shot this wedding and were limited to one on camera flash? I am shooting an event in a similar room(big room /high ceilings) and limited to one flash and no battery pack. My thinking is to diffuse my flash and shoot direct (allowing me to conserve power/recycling time) off camera via an sc-28 cord; the cord giving me some control of direction of light.
Is my thinking flawed?
Robert
Comment by Robert — April 6, 2008 @ 2:16 pm
Comment by Neil — April 11, 2008 @ 3:30 am
In regards to the Indian wedding setup for the reception, would Canon wireless ST-E2 and a couple of 550′s or 580′s work for the volume of light required by that large reception hall? I’m trying to avoid investing in PW’s as well as the IR system.
Comment by Mike Murillo — April 11, 2008 @ 4:41 am
Comment by Neil — April 11, 2008 @ 9:15 pm
Hello NEIL,
Thanks for sharing with us your work and your knowledge.
I would like to know, at what moment do you take the decision to use flashes outside camera (Quantum’s on the corners)?.
If I have walls too, too far, to bounce the light on them, is it a good idea to use this technique?
When a ceiling is too heigth to take that decision… ? and..
What is the top height of ceiling to use only the “black foam”.
Thank you very much.
Comment by IÑAKI — September 18, 2008 @ 1:29 am
Comment by Neil — September 20, 2008 @ 11:11 am
Neil,
You are a genius.
Thank you very much for sharing your work.
I am sure your techniques will help me a lot.
Ameer
Comment by Ameer Zaid — December 30, 2008 @ 6:22 am
just wanted to say thank you for your generous sharing with us!..;-)
I am learning a lot from your site!
Comment by mouzhik — February 8, 2009 @ 2:09 pm
Hi Neil,
I want to make sure that I understand: Were you shooting the 2 flashes into-shoot through umbrellas?
Yehuda
Comment by Yehuda — February 17, 2009 @ 3:13 pm
Comment by Neil — February 18, 2009 @ 9:29 am
Thank you.
Yehuda
Comment by Yehuda — February 18, 2009 @ 10:42 am
Comment by Neil — February 18, 2009 @ 3:44 pm
Neil
i re-read this article and have questionS, why would you use a shoot through umbrella instead of Bare Bulb mode? the lights should be soft enough if you take out the quantum reflector?
Comment by Tim Wong — February 18, 2009 @ 3:29 pm
Neil,
Were the umbrellas pointed at the middle of the ceiling? ( the points where you have drawn the red arrows?
Thanks
Comment by issa — April 2, 2009 @ 11:32 am
Comment by Neil — April 4, 2009 @ 4:20 pm
Neil,
I’ve been reading your blog and really impressed with your flash techniques. This one is inspirational too.
Looking forward to buy your upcoming book.
Sorry for this silly question, but how do you control wireless Quantum flash with an iTTL flash on hot shoe?
Do you use the on camera flash as the master to control the Quantum flash or do you use a Quantum wireless controller to control both on camera flash and the Quantum flash?
I’m currently using Pentax K20D and AF540FGZ flash (wireless capable).
Can I use your setting with my gear too?
Thanks,
Comment by Herman — April 7, 2009 @ 3:24 pm
Comment by Neil — April 7, 2009 @ 10:15 pm
Neil,
Thanks for the useful information.
Is this your default setup for most, if not all wedding receptions in a dimly-lit room? The wedding photographer that I second shoot with automatically puts up two Quantum light (with the round, white, plastic cover, no umbrella) in each corner of the room doesn’t matter the size of the room or the height of the ceiling, do you see anything wrong with that or he should access the situation more carefully before deciding whether to use this setup or not. Is this generally a foul-proof/standard way of shooting receptions?
As a second shooter, I choose to use my own flash and not the Quantum lights so I don’t steal his light during important shots. I know I should avoid pointing my flash directly at the subject or bounce off the ceiling, so what should I do or how should I point my flash if I want to create soft, directional light in the middle of a big room where I can’t bounce off the wall? Can you give me some insight as to how your second shooter handles this situation? Thank you.
Patrick
Comment by Patrick — May 1, 2009 @ 6:48 pm
Comment by Neil — May 3, 2009 @ 5:09 am
How much white balance “pollution” did you notice from the flourescent mixed with flash? Do you ever use the “green” filters?
Comment by Jeff Smith — June 10, 2009 @ 9:04 am
Comment by Neil — June 10, 2009 @ 5:38 pm
Neil
In an Indian Wedding they sometime use a Mandap. A smaller structer inside the room in which they do the actual ceremony. In that circumstance how would you do the lighting. I have used a Quantum and bounced it off the top of the Mandap. What is your opinion.
Thanks
Raj
Comment by Raj — June 28, 2009 @ 10:58 am
Comment by Neil — June 28, 2009 @ 2:43 pm
Neil,
I attended your workshop on July 13, and really liked it very much. Since there is already a person named ‘Raj’ on this board, I will use my other alias Rajan.
I would be very much interested in your configuration and wiring of these Quantum flashes. Particularly so with the TTL flash on camera and simultaneously firing the two remote quantum flashes.
Comment by Rajan — July 16, 2009 @ 6:59 pm
Comment by Neil — July 19, 2009 @ 2:31 pm
You’re supposed to use a Leica when you ‘seek the light’! The sync is so frickin’ slow that you *have* to seek the light.
Comment by Dismayed — September 5, 2009 @ 4:53 pm
Neil, when looking at the first picture from the room it seems to me that with ISO 1600 and F2.8 it must be possible to point your speedlight at this white ceiling…???
Comment by Alwin Koops — September 5, 2009 @ 5:55 pm
Comment by Neil — September 5, 2009 @ 7:00 pm
Hi Neil,
One question, you say you’ve used an on-camera TTL strobe. You also say you triggered the two Quantum strobes with a trigger. Then where do you place that trigger? I guess the hotshoe of your camera is occupied with the on-camera TTL strobe? Or did I miss something…
Thanks, Jan
Comment by Jan — January 21, 2010 @ 8:05 am
Comment by Neil — January 21, 2010 @ 12:13 pm
[...] ein paar Jahren hätte ich regulär zusätzliche Blitzgeräte im Saal verwendet, um mehr Licht zu haben und um die gefürchteten schwarzen Hintergründe, in denen alles mündet, zu vermeiden. Aber das [...]
Pingback by Bouncebeispiele bei Hochzeitsfeiern — Tangents - German translation — February 2, 2010 @ 4:11 am
Hi Neil, you commented above on low ceilings with enough available light. What would your approach be if the ceilings had been low (~13 feet) and there was not enough available light?
Comment by David Holmes — March 2, 2010 @ 4:12 pm
Comment by Neil vN — March 2, 2010 @ 6:13 pm
Hi Neil
Your work is truly amazing, but bouncing your flashes through umbrellas seems like an incredible waste of light, and in my untrained and totally unqualified mind, it goes against your bouncing philosophy. If you’d shot bare bulb and aimed both flashes at one point, you could have created a hot spot on the ceiling and therefore made the main light source more directional, surely? And helped to save the planet with a lower carbon footprint :P
Or am I bonkers? Ok, I’m probably bonkers, and I’ll go back under my rock!
Comment by Rob — March 20, 2010 @ 2:44 pm
Comment by Neil vN — March 22, 2010 @ 5:32 am
Thanks for replying Neil. I guess I just don’t understand how you can direct light just to the ceiling, when you’re shooting through a brolly, which will throw light everywhere like a giant light bulb. I’d have expected the effect to resemble the Gary Fong tupperware which you’re not so keen on. Ie broadly lighting up the scene instead of the softbox effect of diffused directional light. What would be really interesting, to a learner like myself, would be to see how the light actually got dispersed, ie to see a wide shot of the empty room with the flashes firing in shot. But I guess I can try it for myself, next time I find myself in a ridiculously big room like that :)
Comment by Rob — March 22, 2010 @ 10:05 am
Comment by Neil vN — March 22, 2010 @ 11:40 am
Thanks again. You’re very generous with your time and experience and it is much appreciated by us lower lifeforms :)
Comment by Rob — March 22, 2010 @ 1:58 pm
Hi Neil,
Greetings from Poland. :)
There is one thing which I don’t understand. Your on-camera flash was directed upwards and backwards. In such a large room reflected light has a very low level, especially in comparison with lamps Quantum.
What is the role of the on-camera flash, taking into account that Quantum flashes was triggered by radio? Can we don’t use the on-camera flash at all?
Comment by Robert — May 1, 2010 @ 2:07 pm
Neil, I know this is a late post, my question is if the room was dim. or the light were turned down drastically would you still use the same set up because of the high ceilings.
Comment by Jerry — August 25, 2010 @ 2:40 pm
Neil, I am just a very slow person. Can you please, please write down step by step how you connected the flash, Pocket wizard and trigger of quantum together as shown in the picture above….which device connects to which? Thanks a lot
Comment by Joe — March 31, 2011 @ 8:21 pm
Neil, one more thing – how did you get pocket wizard to stay on that 580EX? Is there an adapter or what and what’s that under the flash head? I know these are dumb questions but will very much appreciate your reply ‘cos I’m a rookie in this business.
Comment by Joe — March 31, 2011 @ 8:26 pm
Joe,
2 ways to mount the PW on a flash.
1] Velcro [bit messy, but do-able]
2] Pocket Wizard Caddy @ http://flashzebra.com/products/0070/index.shtml or simply Google ‘pocket wizard caddy’ for other results.
That ‘thing’ under the flash head is Neil’s little ‘secret’ to great flash results.
He calls it the ‘black foamie thing’ and you can search his site for it or even google it and you will get to his site anyway.
It controls light spill, gives direction to light, point it to where you want the flash to come from without any flash spilling directly onto the subject from the flash head itself. Lots of articles on this site re black foamie thing.
Trev
Comment by trev — April 1, 2011 @ 10:07 pm
Comment by Neil vN — April 2, 2011 @ 2:00 am
Neil,
I ran into this post looking on your site about fluorescent and flash combined with the ambient fluorescent contributing to the majority of the light source. We are shooting a senior suited out in her basketball uniform in the school gym on Saturday. Will use an off camera SB900 in a softbox with enough ambient light to give some detail to the surroundings. Would you use a green gel on the flash? Automatic white balance or place it on fluorescent on the camera? Thanks in advance for your answer and your contribution to portrait photography.
Steve
Comment by Steven Vequist — April 7, 2011 @ 3:19 pm