Tangents

photography tutorials, reviews & workshops

tangents photography blog
learn : discuss : share
subscribe today
  • Tangents
  • Tutorials
    • Flash Photography
    • Wedding Photography
    • Studio Photography
    • Posing People
    • Understanding Your Camera
    • Exposure metering
    • BFT
    • Best Photo Books
  • Workshops
    • Info: Workshops
    • In-person
      tutoring sessions
    • Online
      tutoring sessions
    • Video tutorials
    • Workshops in
      New Jersey (NJ)
    • Workshops in
      New York (NYC)
    • Studio Workshop
    • Workshop results
  • Books
    • On-Camera Flash (revised ed.)
    • Direction & Quality of Light
    • Off-Camera Flash Photography
    • Lighting & Design
    • On-Camera Flash (1st ed.)
  • Reviews
    • Nikon
    • Sony
    • Canon
    • Fuji
    • Profoto
    • lighting gear
  • Projects
    • Two Perspectives
    • B&W Infrared
    • Vintage lenses
    • Time-lapse photography
  • Info
    • About
    • Contact
    • Newsletter
    • Join us on Facebook
    • Books by NvN
    • Acclaim
    • Success Stories
    • Photo Gear
    • Photoshop Actions
    • Support this Site
  • Forum

Which image resolution – 72 dpi or 300 dpi?

October 10, 2017 Neil vN 7 Comments

Which image resolution?  72 dpi /ppi, or 300 ppi / dpi?

I feel that as modern photographers who shoot with digital cameras, there are a few basics which we absolutely need to know and understand. Some concepts that are so intrinsic to the digital format, that we have no excuse not to grasp them. One of these things would be the resolution of images – the image size. Not in kilobytes or megabytes (since this is rooted in a more archaic form where images were scanned) – but image resolution as in pixel dimensions. Megapixel size. That kind of thing. The confudled question often then also hinges on which image resolution should you use? 72 dpi or 300 dpi?  (Or also, 72 ppi vs 300 ppi.)

It is a topic that has been discussed here before:
Image size & Resolution – 72 dpi or 300 dpi

But if that is something you don’t understand and you’d rather not deal with in your workflow … I’m offering a new service to photographers – I can change your images from 72dpi (or ppi) to 300dpi (or ppi). I can also change them back. Either direction. As often as you want.

This is for the low, low fee of 25c an image. There is a bulk rate of 10c an image.
After reading some threads in various photography groups on FB, I see there is an urgent need for this. I think this could be a real boost to your workflow if you’re stuck.

But before anyone showers me with easy money, let’s go over this 72 dpi / ppi thing …

The first thing we need to be aware of – ‘dpi’ is for ‘dots per inch’ which is a printer option. We will usually work with ‘ppi’, which is for ‘pixels per inch’. For our work, this is the definition we will most likely work with – how many pixels per inch we need.

When you export your RAW file to JPG (or TIFF), then the Save Options menu will give you an open choice as to what you want your resolution to be. How many pixels per inch. The reality is that you can just leave it at any default option in that box. It doesn’t matter … unless you start working with dimensions in inches or centimeters.

Let’s say you have a 24 megapixel image: 6000 x 4000 pixels.
If you multiply that, you will see you get 24,000,000 which is 24 million. In other words, 24 megapixels. So far, so good.

Now, whether you export that 24mpx RAW file as 72 ppi or 300 ppi (without resizing), you will end up with an image that has the same pixel dimensions. It will remain 24 mpx. Nothing lost, nothing gained. Try it. Have a look and see for yourself. You end up with exactly the same size image.

Ergo, the choice in ppi has no real bearing here. It does not matter. Your image remains the same size.

Now, if you should resize the photo as a specific size (in width and length) in inches or centimeters, then we need to know how large the image can print, or will appear on a website. Then we need to know how many ‘pixels per inch’ we need.

Largely though, the choice between various resolutions are immaterial.

This is also an instant give-away that someone is clueless about digital photography – when they request full-resolution images as “72 dpi” images. That measurement there has no relation to the digital image you have … until you start measuring image size in inches or centimeters.

Similarly, if you are requested to send someone images at 1200 px wide (at 72dpi), then you know they have no idea what they are asking for.

You could just as easily send them images at 999 ppi …

… because the image size in pixel dimensions will be exactly the same as any of the other ppi settings. (Unless of course there are actual inches and centimeters involved in defining image resolution.)

As mentioned at the start, this article also covers the topic: Image size & Resolution – 72 dpi or 300 dpi

 

Summary

Again, if you’re still not sure about all of this, do try it out on a test image. See for yourself. As a digital photographer, you owe it to yourself, your clients and the world, to understand this.

In the meantime, if you need to convert images from 72 ppi to 300 ppi, (or vice versa), then hit me up. I need the cash.

 


 

Camera gear (or equivalents), and lighting gear used in this photo session

The light was from a single Profoto D1 studio flash (500 Ws) (B&H / Amazon), but the important part of the lighting setup here is the Profoto 1’x6’ gridded strip-box (B&H / Amazon). A gridded sjtripbox gives an interesting light on any subject – soft, but directional. Dramatic, but not too contrasty. Also, this long (gridded) softbox gives a unique light fall-off when used close to a wall. I love how I can scallop the light, and either have some of the light fall on the wall … or not. On the right-hand side you can see the white V-flat that was used to reflect some of the light back as fill light.

  • 1/200  @  f/11  @ 160 ISO
  • Nikon D810
  • Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8E VR  /equivalent  Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II
  • Profoto D1 studio flash (500 Ws)   (B&H / Amazon)
  • Profoto 1’x6’ gridded strip-box  (B&H / Amazon) with a Profoto 50 degree soft-grid

 

Related articles

  • Image size & Resolution – 72dpi or 300dpi
  • Using a gridded stripbox as the main light
  • Headshot photographer NJ

 

Filed Under: digital imaging, Photoshop Tagged With: 72dpi, 72dpi vs 300dpi, digital imaging


 

Help support this website

If you find these articles of value, please help support this website by using these B&H and Amazon affiliate links to order your photo gear.

I also offer photography workshops and tutoring sessions, whether in person, or via online video tutoring sessions.

Stay informed via the monthly newsletter.

Please follow me on Instagram for more.

You can also join our thriving photo community in the Tangents group on Facebook, where we show our photos and discuss all things photography.

Thank you,

Neil vN

Books by Neil van Niekerk


 




7 Comments, Add Your Own

  1. 1Adrian Feliciano says

    October 10, 2017 at 4:37 pm

    I remember making this same explanation back in 2001 (or was it 2003?) when I was the “expert photographer” in the Digital Imaging Department of CompUSA (remember them?) in Holyoke, Massachusetts.

    I had an entire handout created and printed out that I would give to customers explaining how “megapixel” was nothing more than the square area of a rectangle defined by pixels in height and width and was irrelevant to screen display as long as the dimensions remained the same and that pixels per inch related to final print size for a given image’s dimensions.

    100x100px at 5,000ppi did NOT give a better printed image than 3000x3000px at 180ppi.

    Adrian Feliciano
    https://alphajulietfoxtrot.com

    Reply
  2. 2Steve says

    October 10, 2017 at 10:04 pm

    …funny one, Neil. Quantum measurements for the newbe.

    Reply
  3. 3Mark Rogers says

    October 11, 2017 at 2:54 pm

    I’ve always found it funny when asked to provide an image at 300dpi with no other measurement.

    It’s like being told that their office is 50mph away.

    Reply
  4. 4Nigel Betteridge says

    November 7, 2017 at 4:41 am

    Brilliant! I have come across several people who don’t understand this. Is the money rolling in yet? :)

    Reply
    • 4.1Neil vN says

      November 7, 2017 at 8:44 am

      Disappointingly, no takers yet.

      Reply
  5. 5John says

    September 29, 2020 at 8:15 pm

    I have a Canon EOS T100. I would like to email a photo of a drawing to a company that cuts rubber stamps of any image that is sent to the company. My camera takes photos with 72 DPI. The rubber stamp company requires 300 DPI image, in order to use it to cut the stamp. I don’t know how convert my 72 DPI images to 300 DPI on my camera. Are you able to advise me on what I can do to solve this dilemma? Thank you.

    Reply
    • 5.1Neil vN says

      September 29, 2020 at 8:21 pm

      Nope, your camera doesn’t take photos as 72 DPI (or 300 DPI). If the client is requesting images as 300 DPI, they have no idea what they are asking … so just send them the high-resolution files without explanation. That should do it.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

categories

Articles & Tutorials

  • • About myself & this site
    • Books by Neil vN
    • Best photography books
    • Black foamie thing
    • Spinlight 360
    • Photographers’ success stories
    • email newsletter
  • • Flash Photography Techniques
    • Natural looking flash
    • Flash + Ambient light
    • Dragging the shutter
    • Bouncing your flash
    • On-camera flash outdoors
    • Exposure metering
    • Flash exposure compensation
    • Bounce flash examples
    • Which is the best flashgun?
    • Flash brackets
    • Off-camera flash photography
    • Flash photography basics
    • Using video lights
    • Flash photography tips
    • Photography books
  • • Photography workshops NJ / NYC
    • Models @ photography workshops
tutorials:
flash photography
Photography
Workshops

Recent Comments

  • Danny Eeltink: Good to hear Neil!!
  • Neil vN: Hi there Danny, Now, more than 5 years later, I am still on top of the world. All is well.
  • Danny: Heya Neil, I saves this blogpost from you as a firm reminder on what can happen and how you can change stuff....
  • Kenneth Fukuda: I just got one from Mr Shaw too! Virtually identical text.
  • Richard Jackson: Currently, the vast majority of electronic speedlights have AF assist beams that use patterns of...

All rights reserved. Copyright © Neil van Niekerk 2023 · Customization by The Traveling Designer

Copyright © 2023 · NvN on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in