Tangents

photography tutorials, reviews & workshops

tangents photography blog
learn : discuss : share
  • Tangents
  • Tutorials
    • Flash Photography
    • Wedding Photography
    • Studio Photography
    • Posing People
    • Understanding Your Camera
    • Exposure metering
    • BFT
    • Best Photo Books
  • Reviews
    • Sony
    • Nikon
    • Canon
    • Fuji
    • Profoto
    • lighting gear
  • Workshops
    • Info: Workshops
    • In-person
      tutoring sessions
    • Online
      tutoring sessions
    • Workshops in
      New Jersey (NJ)
    • Workshops in
      New York (NYC)
    • Photo walks in NYC
    • Studio Workshop
    • Video tutorials
    • Workshop results
  • Books
    • On-Camera Flash (revised ed.)
    • Direction & Quality of Light
    • Off-Camera Flash Photography
    • Lighting & Design
    • On-Camera Flash (1st ed.)
  • Projects
    • Two Perspectives
    • B&W Infrared
    • Vintage lenses
    • Time-lapse photography
  • Info
    • About
    • Contact
    • My Photo Gear
    • Books by NvN
    • Join us on Facebook
    • Acclaim
    • Success Stories

review: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS lens

October 30, 2009 Neil vN 26 Comments

review: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS lens

The specialty of a macro lens is in allowing you much much closer to your subject than a normal optic would .. with the ease of continuous focusing from infinity to the closest distance.  No need to screw in additional rings or lenses or reverse your lens.  A macro lens works as a close-up lens, and as a more usual optic.  And that’s the versatility of it.

The main feature of the Canon 100 mm f/2.8 IS macro lens (B&H / Amazon) is that it offers stabilization.  Now this might not seem such a big deal to photographers who work with a tripod and photograph more static subjects – but the moment you want to shoot on the move, and play around fluently with your composition and angles – then using the lens hand-held becomes a huge advantage.

Instead of photographing the usual macro subjects – flowers and insects – I decided to test the Canon 100 mm f/2.8 IS macro lens (affiliate ), during a portrait session with a model, Annisa.

In the photo above, my settings were 1/200th @ f3.2 @ 400 ISO.  In testing the lens with and without the IS enabled, there is a clear difference in the crispness of the (handheld) images.  There’s no doubt that the IS works, and is a major improvement on the previous generation of this lens ..

 

 

Of course, I had to machine-gun the series of images to get a few images which were critically sharp.  This is because the depth-of-field was minimal at f3.2 at such a relatively close focusing distance.  If I merely breathed, or the model moved ever so slightly, the photograph would be out of focus.   That I had to do this was no fault of this exemplary lens, but rather a by-product of the way that I chose to shoot – handheld.   The stabilization will definitely help with camera shake, but won’t affect how sharp my subject appears due to subject movement .. or my own movement towards or away from my subject, however small a distance it might appear to be.

One more photograph of our model, but this time at  1/100th @ f4 @ 400 ISO

… and it is super-sharp on her one eye, while in an enlarged view,  her mouth goes gently out of focus at such a short focusing distance.   Once again, the lens’ stabilization is without a doubt a huge boost here in the results you can achieve.

I used the Canon 7D camera (affiliate) for this photo session, so the 1.6x crop factor helped compress the perspective for portraits.

 

Specifications

Minimum focusing distance: 12″ / 0.31 meters
Filter size: 67mm   (the older lens has a filter size of 58mm)
Weight:  1.38 lbs / 625g  (ever so slightly heavier than the previous lens)
Length:  4.8″ / 123mm   (a fraction longer than the previous lens)

 

Optical performance

The optical performance of this lens is very impressive!  This lens is sharp.  Even at f2.8
The edge-to-edge sharpness is superb, as you’d expect from a macro lens.

 

Auto-focus performance

Theis updated lens focuses noticeably faster than its predecessor. Macro lenses have a tendency to be slow to focus because of the extreme range that it can focus – hence the focus / distance limiters – but this lens has a very firm response when you initiate auto-focus. Fast and assured.

 

Controls

The lens offers the usual controls via the buttons on the left-hand side of the lens barrel:
– focusing ranges,
– auto focus / manual focus
– stabilization on / off

 

Summary

If you need a stellar macro lens for your Canon camera, and would also like it to double up as an effective portrait lens, then this is it!  Optical performance is truly great, and the lens handles well and offers stabilization.  This is as good as it gets.

If you are interested, you can buy the Canon 100 mm f/2.8 IS macro lens via these affiliate links: (B&H / Amazon)

 

Reviews of other Canon gear

Other Canon photo gear that I’ve reviewed.

Filed Under: Canon, equipment review, equipment reviews: Canon, gear


 

Help support this website

If you find these articles of value, please help support this website by using these B&H and Amazon affiliate links to order your photo gear.

I also offer photography workshops and tutoring sessions, whether in person, or via online video tutoring sessions.

Please follow me on Instagram for more.

You can also join our thriving photo community in the Tangents group on Facebook, where we show our photos and discuss all things photography.

Thank you,

Neil vN

Books by Neil van Niekerk


 




26 Comments, Add Your Own

  1. 1Jennifer Lynch says

    October 30, 2009 at 8:44 pm

    Neil – What is the border on edge of her face? Otherwise the sharpness of the image is impressive.

    Reply
  2. 2Neil says

    October 30, 2009 at 9:02 pm

    Jennifer, I also noticed it, and I assume it is the way that the thin slice of out-of-focus rim-light on her face appears as a halo. It is odd, but I do think it’s just a coincidental fluke in this specific sequence.

    Neil vN

    Reply
  3. 3Rod Pascoe says

    October 31, 2009 at 5:57 am

    How would you say this compares to the 105 Nikon 2.8 VR Neil?

    Rod

    Reply
  4. 4Neil says

    October 31, 2009 at 9:29 am

    Rod, the way I see it, is that Canon has now finally caught up with Nikon in offering stabilization / vibration reduction in a fast-focusing 100mm f2.8 macro lens.

    In other words, whether you’re using Nikon or Canon, you now have a choice of an exceptionally good lens as a macro lens.

    Neil vN

    Reply
  5. 5Rob says

    October 31, 2009 at 2:10 pm

    Looking forward to the 7D review! The new 100mm looks stellar!

    Reply
  6. 6Marco Jona says

    November 4, 2009 at 2:13 am

    Neil, you said “If I merely breathed, or the model moved ever so slightly, the photograph would be out of focus.” I found (shooting insects, not beautiful models!) that using servo focus mode (how is it called for Nikon?) really helps: the continuous focusing usually keeps up with the small movements.

    Marco

    Reply
  7. 7Neil says

    November 4, 2009 at 12:11 pm

    Marco … good tip. Thanks!

    Neil vN

    Reply
  8. 8Chris Ramsey says

    November 4, 2009 at 2:58 pm

    Hey Neil, thanks for posting the review.

    When you are dealing with extremely narrow depth-of-field and you rapid-fire to raise the odds of a sharp image, do you typically auto or manually focus?

    Cheers,
    Chris.

    Reply
  9. 9Neil says

    November 5, 2009 at 3:10 am

    Chris .. I use auto-focus, especially when I hand-hold.

    Neil vN

    Reply
  10. 10john says

    November 7, 2009 at 12:11 pm

    traded my 135mm f/2 in for this lens. in all of my lens swaps over the years, i got this one right. great lens.

    Reply
  11. 11Andreas says

    November 8, 2009 at 9:22 am

    I experiment much with macro, although I use the non IS version of this lens. Maybe I will upgrade later.
    What I normally need to do for getting super sharp focus to use live view and magnify about 5x. When I use auto focus or look in the viewfinder the pictures are rarely sharp.
    Also I found that if I use auto focus and center focus on my 500d very often the camera will loose focus and hunt for a bit which is very annoying.
    Anyone else had success with this technique?
    I try as much as possible to use a tripod for my shots but this is of course very challenging since the angles are strange and the subjects are often moving.

    Reply
  12. 12Paul says

    November 10, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    Neil,

    I don’t know if you have ever used the 135L by Canon, but what would you choose for a portrait lens.

    f/2 vs 2.8+IS ?

    Reply
  13. 13Neil says

    November 10, 2009 at 10:14 pm

    I’ve played with the Canon 135mm f2 .. but never owned one.
    I’m personally much happier with a 70-200mm f2.8 zoom. Much more versatile than the prime tele.

    If I had to choose one lens .. the 135mm f2 or the 100mm f2.8 IS macro lens, I’d have to go with the macro.

    Neil vN

    Reply
  14. 14Sandy Edelstein says

    November 13, 2009 at 12:23 am

    Thanks, once again you are costing me money!

    Reply
  15. 15Art Khachatrian says

    November 15, 2009 at 6:36 am

    I, too, bought the 100mm 2.8 L IS recently.
    So far so good (it is almost as good as it gets. My understanding is – see https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?CameraComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0&Lens=674&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=103 – that only its non-IS sibling (under €500,-); the 135mm F2.0 L (slightly more expensive); the 200mm F2.0 L IS (costs around €5.000,-); 300 F2.8 L IS (ca. €4.000,-) and EF 400 F2.8 L IS (ca. €8.000,-) are as sharp or (in the case of the much more expensive telelenses referred), very slightly sharper and Chromatic Aberration-free.

    Speaking of the 70-200mm F2.8 IS, I’d been very dissatisfied with its optics (except for bokeh. Especially when used fully open) – and sold it before buying the 100mm Macro. I used to have a 70-200 F4 for a while – it was noticeably sharper and had better contrast than its faster, image-stabilised counterpart. But on the 40D the viewfinder was dark as hell – very difficult to focus with LiveView off; the lens wasn’t fast enough (particularly for frequent use under our climatic conditions), I lamented its lack of IS and I found its exterior design with a long and relatively thin barrel, somewhat unappealing.

    I won’t buy the 70-200mm F2.8 (IS), or recommend it to anyone. I completely disagree with those who claim that a portrait lens needs not be sharp. I would be glad to elaborate on the subject, but I won’t digress too far…

    Reply
  16. 16Neil vN says

    August 19, 2010 at 12:58 am

    Art .. as an update: the new Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 IS II lens is quite incredible, and a solid improvement over the first version of the IS lens.

    Neil vN

    Reply
  17. 17Ciaran says

    November 16, 2010 at 10:10 am

    Hi Neil, would you recommend this lens over a canon 100 f2 or 85 1.8 for dimly lit wedding ceremony action. Using on a full frame camera and I’m thinking low light capabilites, bokeh etc. In your experience, is f2 or f1.8 too shallow for those situations?

    Thanks for a great site!

    Reply
  18. 18Neil vN says

    November 16, 2010 at 1:57 pm

    While f1.8 is shallow depth of field, it is necessary for low light. Which makes the 85mm f1.2 even better choice.

    The shallow DoF can be (and is) used as an element of style.

    Neil vN

    Reply
  19. 19sebo2001 says

    March 2, 2011 at 10:10 am

    Great super sharp lens. Quick moview with iS in action on and Off heandheld, she is so hot

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CARvH4ntIQE

    Reply
  20. 20Allen says

    March 19, 2011 at 4:53 pm

    Hi Neil, I was just wondering… did you get round to putting your thoughts on the Canon 7D into words? I’m thinking of upgrading (from a 450D) and would be interested to hear your opinions.

    Reply
  21. 21Neil vN says

    March 19, 2011 at 11:14 pm

    Allen .. I never got around to it. And by now it is quite superfluous since everyone knows it’s a great camera. A definite upgrade from the 450D.

    Neil vN

    Reply
  22. 22merrit says

    April 22, 2014 at 12:06 am

    Thanks for that review, Neil. I’ve been seriously thinking of the 100mm macro to expand my possibilities, and was glad to run across some portraits you’d done with the lens. I’m just wondering if using a cropped sensor could have affected the need for stability, since it would be a bit more magnified than a full frame.

    Reply
  23. 23Richie says

    November 22, 2014 at 9:05 am

    Hi,

    Great review. Thank you so much,
    I wonder if a 85 1.8 and this makro would both make sense?
    I own a 35 1.4 for the wider shots and a 135/2 for tele. So would a 100 2.8 in the middle be enough?

    Reply
  24. 24Neil vN says

    November 22, 2014 at 9:16 am

    The macro has a very specific use – 1:1 close-ups. It also doubles up neatly as a portrait lens. In a way this would make the 85mm f/1.8 slightly redundant for portraits alone.

    Reply
  25. 25Don says

    February 18, 2018 at 9:25 pm

    From what I have been reading the autofocus is faster and more accurate w/ the 100mm non IS macro than the 100mm IS L version. What is your experience?

    Reply
  26. 26Neil vN says

    February 18, 2018 at 9:30 pm

    Don, I didn’t compare the IS vs non-IS versions.
    For me though, the speed of autofocus is less of a critical issue with macro work – and the stabilization is a major boon. So that would override any concerns I would have had about the speed of AF.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

categories

Articles & Tutorials

  • • About myself & this site
    • Books by Neil vN
    • Best photography books
    • Black foamie thing
    • Photographers’ success stories
  • • Flash Photography Techniques
    • Natural looking flash
    • Flash + Ambient light
    • Dragging the shutter
    • Bouncing your flash
    • On-camera flash outdoors
    • Exposure metering
    • Flash exposure compensation
    • Bounce flash examples
    • Which is the best flashgun?
    • Flash brackets
    • Off-camera flash photography
    • Flash photography basics
    • Using video lights
    • Flash photography tips
  • • Photography workshops NJ / NYC
    • Models @ photography workshops
tutorials:
flash photography
Photography
Workshops

All rights reserved. Copyright © Neil van Niekerk 2025 · Customization by The Traveling Designer

Copyright © 2025 · NvN on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in