I’ve been very happy with the older 70-200mm f2.8 VR telephoto zoom. Even even though the edges are softer than the center, it never bothered me. With weddings, I am mostly only interested in the center portions of the image being super-crisp. Similarly, the vignetting didn’t bother me. I usually add more vignetting in post-processing anyway.
Still, I ordered the new Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 AF-S VR II (B&H), and received it on Friday.
It’s beautiful!
Doing a few test shots around the house, and was immediately impressed. It is sharp! I like sharp. Every thing about this lens is good news. Focusing is faster, and flare is very well controlled. There has been considerable debate about the shortening of focal length with this lens as you focus closer and closer. Yet, I would never have noticed it if I hadn’t been told about it. For my work, a total non-issue.
One of the features of this new lens, is that it has even more aggressive vibration reduction / stabilization. So even though I do take my shutter speeds low at times, my advice is always that if you want sharp images, the first thing you need to do is make your shutter speed much faster. Now, I’ve never been one to really be able to hold my camera steady without careful control or with steadying myself against a wall. So for me, vibration reduction is an essential feature on long lenses .. especially since I don’t work with a tripod for the style of photography I do.
At a wedding on Saturday, where I was the second shooter for a friend, I was able to see how the VR worked during an actual photo shoot. During the ceremony I took photos of the guests sitting in the dark temple. How dark? 1/6 th @ f2.8 @ 2000 ISO kinda dark …
Well, there I was picking off shots, with another camera slung over my right shoulder - usually a dead certainty for me to start swaying or my right arm starting to shake.
And here’s the 100% crop
Yup, that is 1/6th of a second with the lens zoomed to 200mm, without carefully tucking in my elbows and checking my breathing or my stance, or even steadying myself.
I just stood there, camera to my eye, and let rip.
I have honestly never been able to get images THIS sharp, THIS easily before in low light with a telephoto zoom. I’m truly impressed.
Obviously, at such slow shutter speeds we’re really pushing the limits .. and therefore not all images will be this sharp. But my success rate was more than 50% and mostly the images that suffered from blur were because people moved during those slow shutter speeds.
I’ll post a more in-depth review later this month, comparing it to the older lens and the 200mm f2.0
This lens, in my opinion, isn’t just a minor upgrade on the previous version, but an important one.



That puppy is on my list too. In a normal album even 12×12 your sample shot will look just fine with the right sharpening.
I’m happy for you Neil.
Cheers!
Bogdan
Comment by Bogdan — February 8, 2010 @ 12:46 am
> How dark? 1/6 th @ f2.8 @ 2000 ISO
Neil, was there a requirement that you only shoot with the available light? Or was this an example of far you could push the lens in a real world situation?
P.S. Hope you visit Singapore or Malaysia someday.
Comment by Kwang — February 8, 2010 @ 3:40 am
Comment by Neil — February 8, 2010 @ 3:50 am
Add a D3s to your bag and you gain yet another stop ;)
I love this lens for it’s sharpness and bokeh, though I do found it sometimes has trouble focussing in low light conditions (something both the lens and the camera should excell at), any ideas as to why this is?
Thanks for your blog Neil.
Still reading it and loving it.
Comment by Joost — February 8, 2010 @ 4:57 am
Comment by Neil — February 8, 2010 @ 8:06 am
Neil,
Did calibrate this new lens with the LensAlign system, as you did with the old one?
Thanks,
Walter
Comment by Walter Rojter — February 8, 2010 @ 10:05 am
Comment by Neil — February 8, 2010 @ 10:38 am
Neil,
1. thanks for noticing the interest from Singapore and Malaysia. I am sure you will be pleased to know that Riceball Photography bookstore in S’pore brought in copies of your book, and it sold well. (I am not from Riceball. I bought a copy from them, went back to buy another as a gift, but the remaining copies had been sold. No worries as the second batch has arrived.)
2. Now that you mentioned the Nikon 70-200mm VR II, are you using both Canon and Nikon systems currently? If so, how do you decide which system to bring for a shoot? Do you get advance information on the locations you will be expected to shoot at?
Thanks you.
Comment by Kwang — February 8, 2010 @ 11:49 am
Comment by Neil — February 8, 2010 @ 12:38 pm
Neil,
I have an issue with my D3 and the old 70-200 where when the camera is in portrait orientation the focus points other than center are terrible for acquiring focus. Have you noticed this? I was thinking about upgrading to the new one to see if it solves the problem.
Comment by Mac Swift — February 8, 2010 @ 1:17 pm
Comment by Neil — February 8, 2010 @ 2:00 pm
This is on my list to replace my old 70-200 lens that was for my D700. The old lens will go to the D300.
Comment by Stephen — February 8, 2010 @ 3:40 pm
I received this lens for a Christmas present — and love it!
Comment by Frances — February 8, 2010 @ 6:14 pm
very impressive indeed!
Comment by Sheri Johnson — February 8, 2010 @ 7:04 pm
Hi Neil,
You don’t say what the focal length was for this shot, which really does have a significant bearing in terms of understanding the true impact of the stabilisation.
Please reveal all;)
Regards,
Andrew
Comment by Andrew Westran — February 9, 2010 @ 12:13 am
Comment by Neil — February 9, 2010 @ 5:02 am
Wow an Amazing Lens …… ok you to. ;-)
Comment by Frank — February 9, 2010 @ 7:18 am
It had better be beautiful for that kinda scratch. yikes! I envy those who can afford this kind of thing..
Comment by Lance — February 9, 2010 @ 10:38 am
I wanted to refer people to a review by Thom Hogan regarding this lens:
http://bythom.com/nikkor-70-200-VR-II-lens.htm
The most significant change between this new lens and the previous one is the focal length of the lens at close focus. The old lens closed much “tighter” than the new lens at close focus distances. This doesn’t impact most photography, except where you need a close head shot.
Comment by Stephen — February 10, 2010 @ 12:30 pm
Comment by Neil — February 10, 2010 @ 1:10 pm
Comment by Neil — February 10, 2010 @ 1:16 pm
I use this lens with the D3 and just love it. It’s my primary lens for the ceremony! Never have to worry about using a flash.
Comment by Bill Schanck — February 10, 2010 @ 1:28 pm
That is impressive – the noise control on the 100% crop is impressive too – is that a Nikon trait, or have you used some good PP noise reduction? I’ve just bought the Canon 70-200IS as the v2 looks to be £1000 more than the v1, so had to get one before they run out!!
Comment by J Lloyd — February 12, 2010 @ 12:45 pm
Comment by Neil — February 12, 2010 @ 12:49 pm
Neil,
Any particular reason why you didn’t bump up the iso since the D3 is supposed to be great at say 3200 or 6400?
thanks,
ED
Comment by ed eckels — February 12, 2010 @ 1:27 pm
Comment by Neil — February 14, 2010 @ 12:18 am
Hello!
Did you notice any of the issues reported on many forums regarding internal production of the lens?
http://nikonrumors.com/2010/01/11/nikon-70-200mm-f2-8-vrii-problem-seems-to-be-wide-spread.aspx
Regards
Comment by Andrej — March 1, 2010 @ 7:56 pm
Comment by Neil vN — March 1, 2010 @ 8:21 pm
I can’t believe you were a 2nd shooter! :)
It’s fun to have read your posts over the years as you went from Nikon/Fuji, to Canon, back to Nikon again. I’m a dedicated Canon user but I do have some issues with focusing in very low light…and there’s no WAY Canon can achieve noise reduction like that. I shot with a 135m f/2, at 3200 ISO, and the noise was so bad I almost had to refund the clients. I looked into Nik Dfine2 software to reduce the noise, and it worked, but only at the expense of softening the entire image. Never thought I’d look longingly at a Nikon lens but this one may be the first…
Comment by Photomatte — March 1, 2010 @ 9:55 pm
Comment by Neil vN — March 2, 2010 @ 2:24 am
Now that you mention it, I really did have quite a bit of fun as a 2nd shooter: it was like I got to eat a really good meal, then skip out before the bill came due. I’ve seen a thread where someone modified their EF-S lens to fit a full frame Canon; now if only someone could figure out how to make a Nikon lens work on a Canon body, I’d be set!
Comment by photomatte — March 4, 2010 @ 1:29 am
Comment by Neil vN — March 7, 2010 @ 5:03 pm