spacer spacer
spacer

Tangents

flash & ambient light – reverse engineering an image (2)

July 27, 2010

My friend, Josh Lynn, just posted this spectacular wedding photograph.  It does look like he used flash there, so I thought this would make a another good example to see if we can ‘reverse engineer’ a photograph in terms of his settings and setup.

I first had a guess at how he set this up; and then had a look at the EXIF data, and this revealed the true story.  See if you can decipher this image yourself, without scrolling down at first …

off camera flash for portraits of the bridal couple

My first impression and educated guess, (before looking at the EXIF data):

It does look like low light levels, with flash being fired into the umbrella the couple is holding up. Since the flash would be behind the bridal couple, I would assume a wireless transmitter and receiver being used to fire the flash.

The umbrella looks like a photographic umbrella. Look at the way the interior is drooping away from the backing at the top.  That double layer says to me it is a photographic umbrella – reflective layer inside, and black backing on the outside.  This would most likely make it a 60″ umbrella if I have to go by the size of it in relation to the couple.

The way the flash was triggered, makes me think it was a Radio Poppers set that controlled the Slave flash behind them.  Here’s why I think the Slave flash was remotely controlled by the Master slave, and not with old school Pocket Wizard units.

For this setup, you’d either have to have done it a number of times before, so that the settings are predictable for old school non-controlled manual flash … or else you’d have to wirelessly control it from the on-camera speedlight.  Since there would be line-of-sight issues, it would have to be the Radio Popper units.  The other alternative – shouting instructions to an assistant crouching out of sight behind them about how to adjust the other flash – well, that just  seems too inelegant.

So that would, in my estimation, make Slaved flash controlled via the Master flash on-camera, via Radio Poppers.  The Slaved flash is most likely set to manual output via the Master.  Of course, the slaved flash would have to be on a small light-stand.  Or perhaps the plastic hot-shoe foot that the flash came with.  However, there is no detectable spill – just the light in the umbrella.  That would make me think the Slaved flash was on a lightstand.

Settings?  It looks like low light. Therefore I would guess a slow shutter speed and a tripod.  The aperture is probably a medium aperture.  Perhaps f5.6 .. perhaps f4 .. somewhere there.

Then I had a look at the EXIF data:

The EXIF data shows that this wasn’t low light, but very bright conditions.

If we consider the Sunny 16 Rule … bright daylight being 1/250 @ f11 @ 100 ISO … that would equate 1/4000 @ f5 @ 320 ISO

The equivalent Sunny 16 settings are very similar to what we see here.  Off by 1/3rd stop in comparison.  But this is an overcast day, therefore Josh’s settings of 1/4000 @ f5.6 @ 320 ISO looks about right to under-expose the sky like that for dramatic effect.  Now we just need that blitz of light in the umbrella to give this beautiful silhouette shot.

Josh also sent me a second photo taken during the same session:

Looking at the EXIF data, we can easily see why the sky looks more neutral and less drama-filled.  Josh increased his ambient exposure by 2 stops.  (By dropping his shutter speed by 2 stops.)

Anyone else want to have a go breaking this down?  Then we’ll see what Josh has to comment.

 

photography books by Neil vN

Amazon USA

Amazon UK

 

newsletter / forum / workshops & seminars

Stay informed of new articles via the monthly newsletter.
Also join us on the Tangents forum for further discussions.

If you need more direct help or instruction on flash photography,
I do present workshops & seminars and also offer individual tutoring sessions.

If you find these articles interesting and of value, then you can help by
using these affiliate links to order equipment & other goodies. Thank you!
 

       Comments (28)

 

 

 

 

 

 

All Rights Reserved © 2006-09 | Client Login