![]()
flash photography techniques
metering techniques ~ flash exposure compensation ~ more examples
![]()
Flash exposure compensation
There are two different kinds of exposure compensation :
- overall exposure compensation.
This is set on the camera body – and affects BOTH ambient and flash exposure for Nikon; but only the ambient exposure with Canon cameras.
- flash exposure compensation.
Setting flash exposure compensation affects the flash output only. Ambient exposure is unaffected. This can always be set on the flashgun itself, but some cameras have a button on the camera body itself where the flash compensation can conveniently be set without taking your eye from the viewfinder.
Exposure compensation is used with the automatic metering modes, however …
with most Nikon cameras, dialing exposure comp in manual exposure mode will bias the meter.
With Canon, you can’t dial exposure compensation in manual exposure mode.
Flash exposure compensation is used to compensate for the flash output when the flash is used in Auto or TTL mode. It obviously can’t be set when the strobe is used in manual output.
Firstly, exposure compensation in general ..
What many new photographers have trouble coming to grips with, is the concept of :
1. adding exposure compensation when the scene / subject is light in tone,
2. and decreasing exposure compensation when the scene in front of the lens is darker in tone.
The reason for doing so, is that your camera’s meter tries to expose for everything as a middle grey tone.
Hence, if you are using one of the auto modes (or Auto / TTL flash), the camera will expose any light toned scene as if it should be of an average tonality. In other words, the light toned subject / scene will be exposed as middle grey. Eg, someone in a white dress against a white wall, will appear under-exposed. So you need to bump the exposure compensation up for lighter toned scenes.
The same reasoning goes for darker toned scenes. A man in a dark suit against a dark brick wall, will have skin tones which over-expose if you left the camera to its own decision. The dark tones would fool the camera’s meter.
To make it even more clear, let’s think about this scenario:
We have a setting where the light is consistent and even. So there will be an exact combination of aperture / shutter speed / ISO settings which will give correct exposure for skin tones.
Now, if our subject dresses in all black or all white clothing, our meter reading will change … yet, the light didn’t change. In other words, we would still need the same exposure, regardless of the variation in our camera’s light meter reading.
So if you insisted on using automatic exposure, then you would have to use exposure compensation. And you would have to vary your exposure compensation depending on your composition – because the size of the light / dark patches of clothing and background will affect your meter reading.
The same reasoning goes with using Auto or TTL flash. You have to continually adjust your flash exposure compensation, dependent on the tonality of the scene in front of your lens.
Also, please read the pages on exposure metering using your camera’s meter, as well as the explanation of why using exposure compensation in an auto exposure mode, is much harder work than using manual exposure mode.
This is the reason why I use manual exposure mode nearly exclusively.
But then you may very well ask why I use TTL flash (or Auto flash) instead of manual flash …
… and the reason why I use TTL flash is that TTL flash is easier to control when I am constantly changing position in relation to my subject.
And as I explained on this previous page, it is easier for me in these situations, to use the camera in manual exposure mode, and the flash in TTL / Auto mode. But this means that I have to constantly change my flash exposure compensation.
Which finally brings us to the rest of the discussion on this page …
Flash exposure compensation when using fill-flash ..
With fill-flash (using TTL or Auto flash), you will most often dial down your flash exposure compensation to give only a tiny bit of fill light. So in this case, your flash exposure compensation will be around -1 to -3 EV. But it depends on the tonality of your subject as well.
But when your flash is your main source of light, you will usually hover your flash exposure compensation around 0EV to +0.7 EV depending on the camera and camera system … and of course, the tonality of your subject and scene. So your flash exposure compensation could still range anywhere from around -2 EV to +3EV.
Once again I want to stress a particular point – there are no specific or fixed settings.
There are just too many variables for anyone to give specific ‘do-all’ settings.
There are a number of factors which would affect how your camera and flash meters TTL flash, and would therefore affect how much flash exposure compensation needs to be dialed in:
- reflectivity of your subject,
- how much of your frame is filled by the subject, and
- how far the subject is from the background, and
- whether the subject is off-center or centered in the frame,
- the individual camera’s exposure algorithms that the camera designers came up with,
- available light – (this ties in with how the camera’s metering algorithms work),
- back-lighting – (strong back-lighting always require a lot more flash exposure compensation).
Therefore you have to juggle all this when figuring out how much flash exposure compensation to dial in. A seemingly tough task that gets easier with experience.
But here’s a hint – when your flash acts only as fill light, then the actual flash exposure compensation can vary a lot without affecting the quality of the final image much.
An example:
Flash exposure compensation of say -2 EV will look slightly different than -3 EV, but in the end the actual photo won’t be incorrectly exposed with either setting. If your flash was the main source of light, then a full stop incorrect exposure would be a lot and might very well mean the image is a flop in terms of exposure. But when the flash is just fill-flash, it is less crucial – although careful and subtle use of flash should always be the aim of course.
With Nikon’s flash system however, you have the choice between TTL and TTL BL, (ie standard TTL and matrix TTL). With TTL BL, the camera and flash take into account the available light and will reduce the flash output accordingly. In my experience, more subtle fill-flash is possible with Nikon’s flash system than with the current Canon flash system.
The conclusion here is that ultimately it is best to know how your specific camera and flash reacts in various scenarios and various lighting conditions. There is only so much that can be learnt outside of actual experience and continual practice. You have to know your own camera.
Cumulative exposure compensation with Nikon cameras ..
The Nikon bodies (that I have experience of), allow you to set overall exposure compensation even when you have your camera set to manual exposure mode. This allows you to bias the metering.
With Nikon, the overall exposure compensation and flash exposure compensation is cumulative .. to an extent. For example, if you were to dial in +1.0 exp comp and -1.0 flash comp, it would cancel each other – but only for this scenario where the ambient light is low, and your flash is your main source of light.
Where the ambient light levels dominate, and flash is used as fill-flash only, then different algorithms come into play, and you have other factors such as max sync speed and available apertures affecting the scenario as well .. and hence the flash and exposure compensation might affect ambient light exposure differently then.
But with Canon, flash exposure compensation and general exposure compensation aren’t linked, as they are with Nikon. So with Canon, in manual exposure mode, you can only set flash exposure compensation and not overall exposure compensation.
(It is no use asking me how it handles this in any of the auto exposure modes, since I use my cameras nearly exclusively in manual exposure mode. You’re on your own there.)
Okay, this has become far too wordy. Time for some more images …
photography books written by Neil vN
| Amazon USA | Amazon UK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
newsletter / forum / workshops & seminars
Stay informed of new articles via the monthly newsletter.
Also join us on the Tangents forum for further discussions.
If you need more direct help or instruction on flash photography,
I do present workshops & seminars and also offer individual tutoring sessions.
If you find these articles interesting and of value, then you can help by
using these affiliate links to order equipment & other goodies. Thank you!






[...] More on Flash exposure compensation [...]
Pingback by planet neil - tangents » manual flash / TTL flash — December 26, 2007 @ 3:42 am
Neil,
Love your site, it has been exceptionally helpful for me, thanks a bunch. Re Canon and exposure compensation, wanted to help folks be clear. You can always set both overall exposure compensation and flash exposure compensation, right from the camera, as these are separate settings. Of course, when for example decreasing overall exposure and then increasing flash exposure to compensate, you get an overall similar exposure, but now different parts of the scene are exposed at different levels, so it doesn’t look the same, nor would you want it to be. This allows for more creative control. One great thing about digital cameras is the opportunity to experiment all you want, and immediately see what you get, so that you can perfect a technique before going on a job. And last thing, you can always set exposure compensation in manual, using the same knob, by just increasing or decreasing exposure of the shot, by adjusting either apeture or shutter speed. We simply no longer call this “exposure compensation”, but its the same thing, as the shot is either overexposed or underexposed by the amount you dial in.
Comment by Jeff P — October 30, 2009 @ 11:38 pm
Neil,
‘Someone in a white dress against a white wall, will appear under-exposed. So you need to bump the exposure compensation up for lighter toned scenes.’
This is pretty much the same concept as the standard example ‘snow scene’ isn’t it? Snow fools the camera’s meter because it’s so bright and therefore the camera would adjust to a lower exposure turning the snow into grey vs. white (5% grey). If I remember correctly this scenario also requires a slight ‘overexposure’ (overall exposure compensation).
Anyways – hope i got this right and thought it may help to remember that the same concept appears to apply to flash exposure compensation.
Comment by Seb — December 26, 2009 @ 10:09 pm
Comment by Neil — December 26, 2009 @ 11:14 pm
Neil,
Your site is one of if not THE best learning resources for photography I’ve ever come across.
I just wanted to make sure I understood what you explaining here. I understand the “over/underexposure” necessary based on the tonality of the subject within the camera; riding the flash compensation might be confusing me. For example, I’m shooting portraits in a garden that has white statues arranged in it, and I choose to (in manual mode and using TTL, no BF) adjust my aperture/shutter/iso accordingly to render them as closer to white and not a middle gray. Now I’m also able to bounce my flash in this situation and use it as the main light on a model wearing a white suit. At this point the camera is set to record the scene accurately, and would also probably record the suit correctly, but the flash is still looking at the scene (white suit, statues) as if it were middle gray, correct? So now, in order for the flash to “see” the scene correctly, I’d give it some added compensation? Am I correct in that if I didn’t add compensation, the flash wouldn’t fire with enough output to appear as the main light?
Comment by Greg — January 7, 2010 @ 8:27 pm
Comment by Neil vN — January 18, 2010 @ 4:24 am
Hi!
Thanks a lot. this is the important part by using Nikon i-TTL.
And this is my main problem.
When shoud I use BL -i-TTL and what situation is the correct one for standard i-TTL?
I know the stuff BL is Fill light and standard i-TTL is if my subjekct is main lighted with the flash.
BUT:
If The sun is in front of me (backlight) it shoud be BL Mode. But if I reduce the ambilight (in M Mode by reducing ISO, The aperture or the shutter speed) don’t I have a TTL-situation?)
At which time I use which mode??
The problem I don’t understand is that:
In standard i-TTL mode. Is it right that the flash power is always set as strong as the ambilight would be very very dark?
So If I make the shutter longer (or the iso higher or the aperture wider open) I have to reuce the flash exposer?? This could not be becuase of TTL I thought.
BUT in i-TTL the flash ignores the ambilight. And when I make higher ISO, longer Time or bigger aperture there will fall ambilight on my subject even more and influencs the light on my subject too. And in standard TTL Mode in the manual there stands that the ambilight on my subjekct does not influence the flash power.
So what is true??
In i-TTL BL this situation should be solved (I thought). BUT (again)
very often the flash is to weak. so it knows when I make the exposere (the ambilight and ambilight on my subject) brighter but why often too dark the flash?
Thanks a lot for yout help
Comment by Ulf Thausing — March 28, 2010 @ 2:19 am
Comment by Neil vN — March 28, 2010 @ 4:20 am
[...] 08 – exposure comp. [...]
Pingback by balancing flash with ambient exposure « Neil vN – tangents — April 9, 2010 @ 3:58 am
How would you need to use the flash exposure comp. when you have a bride all in white and the groom all in black. Would you just have to go with the in camera metering to get this exposure correctly?
Comment by Meredith — April 24, 2010 @ 11:34 am
Comment by Neil vN — April 27, 2010 @ 12:04 pm
“So with Canon, in manual exposure mode, you can only set flash exposure compensation and not overall exposure compensation.”
Your book states the same on page 38…
Are you saying that with the same shot with a Canon body/flash (in M mode) I can’t set both the exposure compensation and the flash compensation at the same time?
I must be missing something here, Neil, because I do that very thing routinely.
Clue me in so I can sleep tonight!
Comment by John — July 21, 2010 @ 8:52 pm
Comment by Neil vN — July 21, 2010 @ 8:57 pm
Hi Neil,
I thank you for time and effort you are doing, you help us a lot!! your blog is one of the best I came across, and a lot
of people will agree.One good thing about you is, you are willing to share!. I bought your ON-Camera flash book and I love it..
God bless you ..
Daniel
Comment by daniel — January 26, 2011 @ 2:30 am
Hi Neil,
Love this site sooo much and study it regularly plus purchased one of your books so far. Wondering if you could offer some advice for outdoor flash re when a subject is wearing glasses. Since i’m aiming straight at them (FEC dialed down) i’m going to get a glare mark on the glasses….any advice to avoid this?
thanks!
Jennifer :)
Comment by Jennifer — May 6, 2011 @ 2:10 pm
Comment by Neil vN — May 8, 2011 @ 1:46 am
Took me some time before I really figured out what you meant with ‘biasing the Nikon camera’s meter in M-mode’, until I was doing some testing few nights ago. I was shooting a white wall in P-mode to see the effect of bright objects on the camera’s meter, with a flash in TTL mode as the main source of light. Indeed I had to use exposure compensation to get the wall nearly white in the image.
Then I switched to M-mode, with FEC set to 0.0, and the same aperture and shutter speed as the image in P-mode. I was ready to use the FEC dial to again make my white wall appear white in the image, but was startled at first to see that the flash already pumped out enough power to make it so. The P-mode’s exposure compensation directly influenced the output of the flash, without even touching the FEC. Aha… now I get it. Dangerous stuff, if you’re unaware.
Comment by Robert — May 15, 2011 @ 11:36 am
I own a 430ex flash for my canon 550d. I also own an omnibounce diffuser. I have read in a number of wedding photography books that using the diffuser outdoors set at a 45 degree angle is worthless and that I should be removing the diffuser and pointing the flash directly at my subjects yet on viewing a dvd recently of Denis Reggie (one of the world’s best wedding photographers) He was taking shots outside at a wedding with what looked like an omnibounce diffuser set at an angle of 45 degrees. Now which is right. It’s just confuses people when they come across contradictary ways to use flash outdoors. Please help.
Comment by jeff — August 9, 2011 @ 9:12 pm
Comment by Neil vN — August 10, 2011 @ 3:28 am
Hi Neil,
First of all i want to thank you for your 2 book, i get enough of knowledge from it, and i am loving it.
Can i ask a silly question here? Where is the Flash Exposure Compensation button on Nikon D700.
Your reader,
TJ
Comment by TJ — August 13, 2011 @ 2:30 pm
Comment by Neil vN — August 14, 2011 @ 4:56 pm
Hi Neil, I’ve just read a recently updated (August 2011) article on Luminous Landscapes, written by Michael Reichmann about exposing-to-the-right. It suggests that you should still use this technique (ETTR) even when the scene is dark in tone. Only when shooting in RAW though.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/optimizing_exposure.shtml
Comment by Allen — August 16, 2011 @ 2:33 am
Hey Neil, regarding the use of on camera flash with off center or way off center subjects. I’ve scanned the use of flash exposure lock “FEL” and was unable to find any mention of it on your site. Do you ever find the use of it or does the FEC adjustment always cover that for you?
An example: I was shooting from a kayak at dusk with some faint glow in the background sky. Another kayaker was placed off center. I’m shooting in manual with TTL flash. Being basically dark out my flash was blasting all it had for the subject was not close-up and off center. I dialed down the FEC all the way but that was not enough. Is FEL the only practical solution here other than manual settings on the flash? At the time I was using a Canon Rebel, center weighted metering, with center focus activated to which I locked on the subject then recomposed. Would setting to evaluative meter or in the case of my D700 which I mainly use, set to the matrix setting help in this situation?
Your advice, as always, is greatly appreciated. Thanks again.
John R
Comment by John M Roberts — October 16, 2011 @ 2:33 pm
Comment by Neil vN — October 18, 2011 @ 2:47 am
Just a short follow-up. I wish there was a custom function to link pressing half way down on the shutter button to include flash exposure evaluation and lock it with the focus. That would be so much more efficient.
Comment by John M Roberts — October 21, 2011 @ 3:24 am
Comment by Neil vN — March 1, 2012 @ 12:24 am
Hi Neil,
I’m very happy that I would ask you some question.You’re really one of my favorite photographer.
Is there any difference in Nikon when the flash acts as fill light, using TTL:
overall exposure compensation -2EV, flash exposure compensation +1EV vs only flash exposure compensation -1EV. Is it the same?
(camera in M mode.)
Thank you for your great help.
Thanks,
Guy
Comment by Guy Leung — March 15, 2012 @ 11:10 pm
Comment by Neil vN — March 16, 2012 @ 12:23 am
Hi Neil,
regarding exposure measurement for TTL flash: Do you use (with your Canon gear) Flash Exposure Lock (FEL)?
I understand it as some kind of “spot metering” and I have good results pointing the spot to the face of the subject …, then do the measurement and then focus and recomposing.
But actually, the results seem quite similar to center-weighted average…
best, Vicco
Comment by Vicco — April 3, 2012 @ 3:56 am
Hi
Thank you for a realy good site.
I tried on my Nikon D7000 in M to take a ok metered picture, after that i dial my overall exposure compesation to +3 took a picture and then to -3 took a picture, The +3 and -3 was shown in the viewfinder, but the pictures were all the same, no diference in exposure.
So on D7000 i looks like you can use overall exposure compensation in manuel mode.
But it have no effect
Best Frank
Comment by Frank R — June 25, 2012 @ 4:53 am
Frank,
If you didnt change your settings i would assume the image would be the same regardless of what you had dialed in on your exposure compensation.It only affects the exposure indicator. Shutter and aperature dont change, so your image wont. mike
Comment by mike — June 25, 2012 @ 12:31 pm
Yes i found out how i works during the day :)
Comment by Frank R — June 25, 2012 @ 12:37 pm
Comment by Neil vN — June 26, 2012 @ 8:43 pm
Thanks for answer.
.
And i think you also answered what i was about to ask you.
Yesterday i found out, that in M the exposure compensation button,could be used as Flash compensation button and because it is easier to use on my camera, i would hear if there is any disadvantages associated with this
Best Frank
Comment by Frank.R — August 24, 2012 @ 7:50 am
No disadvantage except if you happen to *forget* you have dialed that in and next time wonder why the flash is giving too much or not enough power.
The other advantage with Nikon/Manual Mode and Exposure Compensation on the body is that it can be cumulative for Flash, ie: Dial in -2 on Flash itself and dial in -2 on camera body you get an equivalent -4 in total. Really cool in certain situations.
Remember to dial back body compensation to Zero when finished. Been there, done that. :(
Trev
Comment by Trev — August 24, 2012 @ 7:15 pm
Thanks for reply
Yes of cause, but it’s the same using the real FEC or the on Flash FEC.
I even think it will be easier to remember when using the Exposure Compensation button, because you will see next time you Light meter.
But of cause, cameras have so many buttons and wheels for many things, and sometimes you forget to reset :)
Frank.R
Comment by Frank.R — August 25, 2012 @ 1:40 am
Two questions.
1. Ttl flash uses camera metering to determine flash output. Auto flash uses flash itself to determine flash output,and common before we had ttl flash. Would you recommend using auto flash with manual exposure?
2. Sb 900 can heat up quick if fired at full output. So I normally reduce it to 1/4 output, and raise iso to increase exposure globally and keep shutter at max sync speed, when shooting indoors and with mixed lighting . Is that a good idea?
Comment by John wong — September 28, 2012 @ 3:02 am
So glad that I found your site, I have been trying so many times, that everytime I photo a subject that is very closed to a background wall, the picture always looks dark or underexposure. Would you please give me some tips on how to get the correct exposure. I’m using a Canon Rebel w/ kit lens. Thank you very much.
Comment by Tim — April 26, 2013 @ 12:24 pm
Comment by Neil vN — April 26, 2013 @ 1:00 pm