Tangents

photography tutorials, reviews & workshops

tangents photography blog
learn : discuss : share
  • Tangents
  • Tutorials
    • Flash Photography
    • Wedding Photography
    • Studio Photography
    • Posing People
    • Understanding Your Camera
    • Exposure metering
    • BFT
    • Best Photo Books
  • Reviews
    • Sony
    • Nikon
    • Canon
    • Fuji
    • Profoto
    • lighting gear
  • Workshops
    • Info: Workshops
    • In-person
      tutoring sessions
    • Online
      tutoring sessions
    • Workshops in
      New Jersey (NJ)
    • Workshops in
      New York (NYC)
    • Photo walks in NYC
    • Studio Workshop
    • Video tutorials
    • Workshop results
  • Books
    • On-Camera Flash (revised ed.)
    • Direction & Quality of Light
    • Off-Camera Flash Photography
    • Lighting & Design
    • On-Camera Flash (1st ed.)
  • Projects
    • Two Perspectives
    • B&W Infrared
    • Vintage lenses
    • Time-lapse photography
  • Info
    • About
    • Contact
    • My Photo Gear
    • Books by NvN
    • Join us on Facebook
    • Acclaim
    • Success Stories

off-camera flash photography: feathering the light

December 4, 2010 Neil vN 17 Comments

off-camera flash: feathering the light

Comparing those two images, you should notice two things immediately:

– the sky is brighter in the top image.

– the grass in front of the group is more lit in the bottom photo.  In other words, the accent is more on the guys in the top photo, since grass in front of them are less well lit.

Both images were lit by a single off-camera softbox, using a speedlight. My on-camera speedlight was set to Master, but with its output disabled. Therefore only the Slave flash (in the softbox) was lighting the group.  I liked the exposure on them after dialing down the flash exposure compensation to -2EV.  The initial test images were blown out because of the predominantly darker tones in the image, so I had to pull down the TTL flash exposure.  Since TTL flash is an automatic metering mode, the camera will try to expose for the overall scene as a mid-tone. And I had to over-ride that with my FEC.

Now, about the two comments at the top …

1. The sky is brighter in the top image because I dropped the shutter speed from 1/50 (as in the bottom image) to 1/25 for the image at the top.  I wanted more of the early evening sky to register.  This is a classic example of dragging the shutter to allow more ambient light in. You won’t see camera shake because with the camera settings chosen, the guys would’ve been completely under-exposed.  Black. Nothing.  So you simply won’t notice camera shake.  I could’ve pulled my shutter speed down even more if I wanted to.  (My aperture was f5.6 and ISO was 800 for both those images).

2.  The way the light falls off in the top image is on purpose. The image at the bottom came first.  I felt the ground was over-lit.  Too bright, and taking attention away from the guys. I therefore gave my assistant, the instruction to ‘feather the softbox upwards’.

I purposely wanted less light on the foreground. By angling the softbox upwards so that the central area is pointing up instead of directly at the guys, I had less light spill on the ground.  I still get enough light on the groomsmen, since the TTL flash exposure would give me the correct exposure still (for the FEC that I set).

Directing the light away from your subject like this, using the edges of the ‘cone of light’ coming from your light source / softbox, is called ‘feathering the light’.   You can do this to control the way the light spills, or to control how the light spreads across your subject.

Filed Under: flash photography, lighting, off-camera flash, wedding photography Tagged With: lighting techqnique, New Jersey wedding photographer, New Jersey wedding photographers, off-camera flash, using a softbox, wedding photography


 

Help support this website

If you find these articles of value, please help support this website by using these B&H and Amazon affiliate links to order your photo gear.

I also offer photography workshops and tutoring sessions, whether in person, or via online video tutoring sessions.

Please follow me on Instagram for more.

You can also join our thriving photo community in the Tangents group on Facebook, where we show our photos and discuss all things photography.

Thank you,

Neil vN

Books by Neil van Niekerk


 




17 Comments, Add Your Own

  1. 1Bogdan says

    December 4, 2010 at 11:34 am

    “No migrating Canada Geese have been blinded by the making of this picture”. :-)

    Cheers!

    Bogdan

    Reply
  2. 2Jason says

    December 4, 2010 at 1:09 pm

    Hey Neil. With the groom in the foreground like this and with his fellas behind him the exposure looks pretty even on all of them. Taking the inverse square law into account, did the light have to be placed farther back to allow for a more gradual light fall-off? What was your focal length if I may ask? Thanks as always!

    Reply
  3. 3Neil vN says

    December 4, 2010 at 7:40 pm

    Jason, I was shooting at 24mm, laying flat on the ground.

    The groomsman on the left-hand side is a touch darker than I would’ve liked, but can easily be brought up with the local correction brush in Lightroom or ACR / Bridge. But I wanted to show here what it looks like directly out of camera, so we have a sense of what the lighting actually does.

    The softbox is to my left, and above and a little behind me. The light fall-off is gradual because the distance to the groomsman in the back isn’t that big a jump from the softbox, as the distance from the groom to the softbox. The ratio isn’t too extreme, and therefore the light fall-off isn’t too noticeable.

    Neil vN

    Reply
  4. 4parv says

    December 5, 2010 at 5:45 am

    I like the first image as the grass is dimly lit, something I need to keep in mind in my own pictures. I like the second photo as the lower halves of the humans are reasonably distinguishable from the background.

    Neil, if this were a model|workshop shoot and/or had reasonable time, would you have placed a flash in the back in order to separate the legs?

    Reply
  5. 5Neil vN says

    December 5, 2010 at 8:51 am

    parv … that would work very well.

    Neil vN

    Reply
  6. 6Drew says

    December 5, 2010 at 12:15 pm

    Hey Neil: Great stuff as usual. Thanks! Trying to understand your comment “So you simply won’t notice camera shake.” What if you were using a longer lens without image stabilization and without a tripod at 1/25 sec. The thing that is keeping the photo sharp is the short duration of a flash, right? (Given that the guys don’t move).

    Reply
  7. 7Marvin says

    December 6, 2010 at 10:55 am

    Great article! But I am with Drew trying to understand your comment about no camera shake at 1/25 shutter speed. Is it because all of the real light hitting the subject is coming from the flash, and the ambient light is so low it does not matter?

    Reply
  8. 8Bogdan says

    December 6, 2010 at 11:24 am

    Drew, the ambient is so low it does not have a major impact aside from setting the mood. Not much of this ambient will register and the eye will be drawn by the sharp, well exposed parts of the picture.
    The ambient is low enough in this shot so first or second curtain flash won’t matter either. Even with a long, non-stabilized lens the short duration of the flash will freeze motion if the effect of ambient on the main subject is kept about two stops under.

    Cheers,
    Bogdan

    Reply
  9. 9Neil vN says

    December 6, 2010 at 8:07 pm

    regarding the slow shutter speed and lack of camera shake …

    Here is an image taken less than 2 minutes after the groomsman shot. I had moved my position such that the Slave flash didn’t fire. The sky is already a bit darker in just that short time, but you will get an idea of just how dark it was without the flash, using those camera settings. It’s black. There’s nothing that registers in the foreground.

    Flash is a near-instantaneous burst of light, and will freeze most average movement, whether my subject or my camera’s shake.

    So I could’ve gone even lower without it being noticeable at all.

    Neil vN

    Reply
  10. 10Sam Ellis says

    December 7, 2010 at 10:30 am

    Great article Neil. I actually use the black foamy thing on a Speedlight for a similar effect of blocking the light from lighting the foreground.

    Reply
  11. 11Nina says

    December 11, 2010 at 11:40 am

    Any tips on focusing when it is this dark? I’ve often had horrible luck with that and the times I’ve used the AF illumination my batteries zap out so fast it’s just frustrating! Thanks for all your help!!!

    Reply
  12. 12trev says

    December 12, 2010 at 2:19 am

    Hi Nina,

    I usually carry a small penlight/flashlight, very cheap, get someone to simply aim at a face so you can get an edge to lock onto, then get the ‘someone’ to turn off the light and take your shot. There are nearly always spare people hanging around during these shoots.

    You can focus much quicker with this method, especially if the subject if backlit a lot more, than using the AF illumination, I have found, stops lens doing a lot of ‘hunting’ for sure.

    Reply
  13. 13Neil vN says

    December 13, 2010 at 8:04 am

    Nina .. I use the AF-assist of my flash. Carry spare batteries. : )

    Neil vN

    Reply
  14. 14Joanna Kapica says

    December 17, 2010 at 4:45 pm

    Thank you Neil for great post and examples with very easy to follow explanation.
    I haven’t known the technique of feathering the light, but can see how well I can use it in some of my work.

    Reply
  15. 15Neil vN says

    December 17, 2010 at 6:18 pm

    Joanna .. it has all kinds of uses.

    You can feather the light to reduce glare off surfaces in the background.

    Or you can feather the light as seen in the top photo here, to have equal light on both subjects.

    btw .. thanks for the posting on Twitter of this page. Always appreciated. :)

    Neil vN

    Reply
  16. 16Christine says

    March 9, 2011 at 12:55 am

    Hi Neil,

    I love your site and all of your writings. There is a lot of great information. I am wondering when you say that you disable the output from your on camera flash how are you doing this. I have a d3 along with radio poppers. I am trying to have my on camera flash not affect my exposure and just let my off camera do all of the work, but can’t seem to figure it out. Thanks again for all of your great info.

    Reply
  17. 17Neil vN says

    March 9, 2011 at 10:29 am

    Christine … I think this might need a proper dedicated blog post. We’ll come back to this one.

    [ placeholder ]

    Neil vN

    Reply

Leave a Reply to trev Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

categories

Articles & Tutorials

  • • About myself & this site
    • Books by Neil vN
    • Best photography books
    • Black foamie thing
    • Photographers’ success stories
  • • Flash Photography Techniques
    • Natural looking flash
    • Flash + Ambient light
    • Dragging the shutter
    • Bouncing your flash
    • On-camera flash outdoors
    • Exposure metering
    • Flash exposure compensation
    • Bounce flash examples
    • Which is the best flashgun?
    • Flash brackets
    • Off-camera flash photography
    • Flash photography basics
    • Using video lights
    • Flash photography tips
  • • Photography workshops NJ / NYC
    • Models @ photography workshops
tutorials:
flash photography
Photography
Workshops

All rights reserved. Copyright © Neil van Niekerk 2025 · Customization by The Traveling Designer

Copyright © 2025 · NvN on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in