
effective on-location portraits, with off-camera flash
When I photograph someone on location, I rely on a simple, yet effective method that will ensure that at the very least, I will get portraits that work. Let’s have a look at this method, step-by-step:

1/1000 @ f3.2 @ 200 ISO
Nikon D3 // Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 AF-S VR II (B&H) @ 155mm // ambient light only
1. find a good background
The background can be uncluttered and plain and work as a simple backdrop .. or it can be a pattern or an interestingly detailed background .. but it has to somehow complement your subject.
Just as important, is to look at the edges of the frame. Carefully look at what you are including … and also what you are excluding. Try to avoid things that will distract attention from your subject. If there is a busy background, see if you can compose your photograph such that the background accentuates your subject. Or that your background is perhaps a patterned background with repetitive forms.
Throw the background out of focus .. at least to some extent.
2. consider your light
The final image here is the only photo where only available light was used. But in all four photographs, I looked for a background such that I could position my model, Anelisa, in even light. No hard cross-shadows from sunlight. No odd dappled light pattern.
In the first three photographs, I looked for a spot where I could position Anelisa against a brighter background. I would then find my exposure for the background … which implies that she was under-exposed. Then I used manual flash in a softbox to expose correctly for her. The ambient light on her is then under by around a stop or two stops in these examples.
In using the flash & softbox, I could then control the direction and quality of light on her. And of course, balance her exposure with that of the background … as I wanted to. In other words, I had a fair amount of control over how bright the background and subject were in relation to each other. For example, in the second (B&W) image, I could’ve chosen to have my background slightly brighter. Or darker. Similarly for the first image. I wanted my background *that* bright … and then pulled the exposure for her up to that level. (Via flash in a softbox.)
If I had decided to use available light only for all the photographs I took during the session, I would have to very carefully consider the quality of light falling on her .. and then how I position her. But in using flash (with a softbox), I have a lot more leeway in what I can do.
3. composition
The photos shown here all have a central composition. It was a very specific decision in these cases. I really don’t want to fall into the straight-jacket of mechanically composing my photographs with the Rule of Thirds (or the Golden Mean) in mind. Don’t even use that ugly ‘R’ word around me.
I want to instinctively react to what I see, and adjust my composition accordingly. This does mean that I make mistakes that I can clearly recognize afterward in the editing process. I do tilt images for compositional effect, but sometimes the tilt creeps in because I’m not careful enough while shooting. It it something that I have to guard against, and try to self-correct during the shoot.
Not only were these images specifically shot with a central composition, the 2nd and 3rd images were posed such that she is quite straight-on to the camera. If it works, it works.
4. position yourself
This relates to how the previous three considerations – background, lighting and composition – are balanced in terms of your own position. If you change position, you change the way your subject is related to the background. You change the composition. And quite often, if you change your position, you change the light you will see on your subject.
Think of the two extremes as an example: If you are in line with the light falling on your subject, you will have flat / even light. If you stand behind your subject, you have a silhouette.
In short, consider how your own position changes the balance in your composition, lighting and background.

1/250 @ f4.5 @ 200 ISO
Nikon D3 // Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 AF-S VR II (B&H) @ 150mm // Q-flash in manual mode

1/250 @ f4 @ 200 ISO
Nikon D3 // Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 AF-S VR II (B&H) @ 160mm // Q-flash in manual mode

1/250 @ f4 @ 200 ISO
Nikon D3 // Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 AF-S VR II (B&H) @ 82mm // Q-flash in manual mode

1/250 @ f4.5 @ 200 ISO
Nikon D3 // Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 AF-S VR II (B&H) @ 150mm // Q-flash in manual mode
related articles
- more articles about off camera flash
- tips on posing people / working with a model
- making your images pop – through choice of lens
photography books by Neil vN
newsletter / forum / workshops & seminars
Stay informed of new articles via the monthly newsletter.
Also join us on the Tangents forum for further discussions.
If you need more direct help or instruction on flash photography,
I do present workshops & seminars and also offer individual tutoring sessions.
If you find these articles interesting and of value, then you can help by
using these affiliate links to order equipment & other goodies. Thank you!





For just a second there, I thought the reason why she was hiking her skirt in the first image was to show how she had the NvN logo tattooed on her leg….
Comment by Trent Ernst — March 22, 2010 @ 12:38 pm
Neil
Was your Q-flash in a softbox ?
Beautiful Portraits.
-MP
Comment by Mohanpreet Singh (MP) — March 22, 2010 @ 4:51 pm
Comment by Neil vN — March 22, 2010 @ 5:09 pm
Neil,
Been following your site for a while and love all the info you give us, thank you very much. I don’t really know too much about post processing techniques and use very limited amount of photoshop on my photos (basically due to lack of knowledge). But was wondering why use things as the Nik Color Efex Pro 3 (Glamour Glow / B&W Conversion) instead of what photoshop has to offer. Do these programs do what photoshop already does just a lot more simplified?
Thanks again for the wealth of info you share!
Ed V
Comment by Ed V — March 22, 2010 @ 9:21 pm
Comment by Neil vN — March 22, 2010 @ 9:32 pm
Which is the battery for your Qflash (x2t2). Nice portraits.
Comment by regina lopez — March 22, 2010 @ 9:46 pm
Comment by Neil vN — March 22, 2010 @ 10:00 pm
hello Neil; i just wanted to ask you if i do really need to buy
an expensive lens like the 70-200 2.8 to take this kind of pics
because i see that at the end we always end up by using photoshop
so where is just the quality of the lens please excuseme if
i am not clear with my question but inglish is not my lenguis
and i am trying. but thank you so mouch for all your help
that you give us for free.
i am trying to buy my new gear of lenses thats why i am asking before i buy.
thanks!!! Jorge
Comment by jorge galvan — March 22, 2010 @ 10:15 pm
Comment by Neil vN — March 22, 2010 @ 10:33 pm
I noticed that the focal length for all your shots were 82mm. Any particular reason why you only used 82mm?
Why not 85mm? :)
Comment by Jeff — March 22, 2010 @ 11:16 pm
Comment by Neil vN — March 22, 2010 @ 11:23 pm
Hi Neil, another series of great shots. I love the way your models look in your photos, can u pls suggest us how do u get models to be so comfortable? They are probably professional models, but i find the “people” skills are hardest to master.
Esp during weddings, i sometimes run out of poses and what to ask them to do…lol…and thats also my inexperience.
like always, it was pleasure to visit ur site.
Comment by Ujwal — March 23, 2010 @ 2:57 am
Comment by Neil vN — March 23, 2010 @ 6:53 am
(photo by Alex Rite)
Comment by Neil vN — March 23, 2010 @ 6:57 am
Hi Neil, I notice that you always use imagenomic portraiture. Have you ever tried the topaz clean? Looks like it does the same thing as the imagenomic product. Is there any reason why you choose the imagenomic portrature instead?
Comment by Adi — March 23, 2010 @ 11:57 am
Comment by Neil vN — March 23, 2010 @ 12:08 pm
Hi Neil,
Another useful post. thx.
Some places I have seen, expecially wedding images,very good tone smoothness.
The said smooth tone images are having foreground,subject and background items and they are in daylight. They are having a velvet look and more to a 3d effects.
Neil, Can you name a plugin purticularly for tone smoothness? Can you please explain a little to that tone smoothness?
Comment by rafiayub — March 23, 2010 @ 1:28 pm
Neil,
I can’t get over how effective your instructions are when you delve into a complex topic. You start off with a general overview that clearly defines the issues and goals. Then into the specific details and reasons for your approach, each effectively linked and melding into the next. I believe from a grammar teacher’s perspective, you would get top grades!
-Jory, Omaha, NE. (Afghanistan for until Sunday, then it’s leave!)
Comment by Jory — March 23, 2010 @ 1:32 pm
Comment by Neil vN — March 23, 2010 @ 2:04 pm
Hi Neil,
Im a huge fan and infact I have a copy of your book “On camera flash” and it’s very helpful in my quest to understand and master lighting more.On one of your images above (last image),I see that the you have 1/1000 @ f3.2 @ 200 ISO
as your setting,question is… were you using CLS to get that HI shutter?I know that Pocket wizard cant go hi up past 1/250 on Nikons (yet), and are all the shots taken with a softbox? – Thank you!
Comment by rOiko — March 23, 2010 @ 3:56 pm
Comment by Neil vN — March 23, 2010 @ 4:03 pm
Hi Neil,
In the first three images you used Q-flash in manual mode. Why you did not use Q-flash in TTL mode?
Thanks again,
Alfredo.
Comment by Alfredo Medina — March 23, 2010 @ 5:06 pm
Comment by Neil vN — March 23, 2010 @ 7:11 pm
Hi Neil! Thanks a lot for sharing your wonderful knowledge in the photography world! You mention that you prefer to pay for the model, how much, if you don’t mind, do you pay or affer her by the hour? Thanks again! Elio.
Comment by Elio Hernandez — March 23, 2010 @ 10:46 pm
Comment by Neil vN — March 23, 2010 @ 10:50 pm
Thanks! Neil!
Comment by Elio Hernandez — March 23, 2010 @ 10:53 pm
Wonderful set and instructions Neil :) I love the series :) Specially the tonal placements :)
Comment by Arnold Gallardo — March 23, 2010 @ 11:24 pm
I’d like to ask about the fill-in flash. I follow your method, and use Nikon TTL-BL on the SB900. D90 is set to manual matrix mode, or sometimes Av (shutter is 1/125 to 1/200). But for whatever reason the TTL doesn’t “just work” as it should. Sometimes it’s too bright, sometimes too dark (the subject). Sometimes it feels like FEV doesn’t help – I’m only 5 steps away, surely it’s not out of power?
Your previous post suggested that Nikon CLS ‘knows’ where the subject is vs bg, and should work even for off-center subjects. But I can’t get it to work here.
Comment by Val — March 24, 2010 @ 12:22 am
Comment by Neil vN — March 24, 2010 @ 2:36 pm
That is an exquisite example of perfectly balanced flash and ambient. They look totally natural. Well done.
Comment by Marcel Van der Horst — March 25, 2010 @ 4:01 am
Hi Neil!
Another great post! :) I have a few questions regarding the Quantum flash.
In the past, I’ve shot all “off-camera-flash” images using manual flash power, and manual exposure. I would love to start using ETTL as I’m guessing it would be much faster/easier in a crunch situation (like a wedding, etc.)
But…the price for a Quantum system that functions with wireless ETTL is quite high.
Have you ever used the “auto” mode on your Qflash? Does it work well?
Just curious…why did you shoot with manual flash in these pictures?
Thanks for any advice!
Rob
Comment by Rob Sigler — March 25, 2010 @ 2:52 pm
Comment by Neil vN — March 25, 2010 @ 3:01 pm
Hi Neil,
Your photos and your flash technique have really inpired me. I’m new to digital photography and have not used flash very often. However, after meeting you and seeing your work at Photo Expo in New York, I have been interested in learning more about using your technique for portraits.
Is Portrait Professional the same or similar to Imagenomic? I love taking portraits and try to use natural light as much as possible, but I realize, after seeing your work, that a flash can provide that subtle difference between a nice shot, and a great shot.
Thanks for help and for taking the time to share your knowledge. I certainly appreciate.
Michael
Comment by Michael Azzato — March 25, 2010 @ 3:18 pm
Comment by Neil vN — March 26, 2010 @ 4:40 am
Hi Neil,
I have always been a fan of yours and I really appreciate all the techniques that you have shared.
I am just curious with the use of flash…I am assuming that the ambient light is dark enough so that you can shoot it at f4. If you were to shoot the model at f2.8 could that still have been possible? or would you have to use ND filters to compensate or hypersync?
Also, could you share your “favourite Photoshop action” that you sometimes use?
Thank you in advance,
Cham
Comment by Cham — March 27, 2010 @ 4:33 am
Comment by Neil vN — March 27, 2010 @ 6:43 pm
Hi Neil
I´ve learnt a lot from you via your site! Thanks.
A question: Could you have replicated the same effect in these photos with a reflector using natural light only? I understand that flash is necessary indoors or at night but during the day outside wouldn´t it be as easy to reflect the daylight?
I look forward to your comments.
Mark E.
Comment by Mark E. — March 28, 2010 @ 4:27 am
Comment by Neil vN — March 28, 2010 @ 4:46 am
Neil,
Regarding the model’s fee for casting/test that you pay, does that included their makeup and hair. As always, “Awesome Work”. Gregory
Comment by Gregory — March 29, 2010 @ 2:35 pm
Comment by Neil vN — March 29, 2010 @ 2:57 pm
Neil, i have some question for you :
1) when you do test shot without flash to find your background exposure what metering you use matrix or spot and what position your metering, you make zero or you make more over exposure for your background?
2) Do you use light meter to find exposure what you want for your model?
Thanks Neil
Comment by Joe — April 2, 2010 @ 1:40 am
Comment by Neil vN — April 2, 2010 @ 2:46 am
Hi Neil!
Your articles are great and informative. Thanks! I do have a couple of questions though. In your pictures where you are using your off camera flash: I would assume that with the high shutter speed you used, you should achieve a dark background– but you still got the background in. How did you get this? My thoughts to answer this are: 1)you exposed for the background like you said, 2)your apeture wasn’t that small to diminish the light source, so did it have to do with using a zoom lens instead of prime?, 3) your backgrounds were not that close to the subject where the flash would take over and make the background go dark. Am I right in any of these?
Also, in exposing your image, are you using spot metering? So do you say to yourself the correct exposure of the background just to keep it in mind and then you set the flash exposure to act more of a fill light? I’m sorry! This question I am having a hard time putting to words.
Thanks,
Anna R. Hodges
Comment by Anna R. Hodges — June 9, 2010 @ 1:27 pm
Comment by Neil vN — June 9, 2010 @ 9:40 pm
Comment by Neil vN — June 9, 2010 @ 9:46 pm
Neil, fantastic article again.
One question, regarding Jorge’s question. You write: …”These images were all shot around f4 … and the f2.8 aperture wasn’t necessary. But for a certain style of photography, and for specific scenarios, it becomes essential. If you need that wide aperture”…
I’m just doing research on this matter, because I’d like to buy a 70-200mm lens too. I’ve got a question: is it correct to say that when you shoot a model, whom is changing her pose, moving a little to make the photos a bit dynamic, etc, that it’s better to use a tele-range (100mm or more) with an aperture of f/4, so you have: a) a blurry background and b) a sharp face. Because, until now, I always did this with at 50-70mm with wide open aperture (f/1.8-f2.8) so I could get the background blurry, but.. it was difficult for me to keep the model’s face sharp at this very limited dof.
So very wide open apertures (f/1.4-f2.8) are fine for still portraits, where the model doesn’t move or moves very little, is that right?
Many thanks Neil, you are teaching me a lot!
Comment by Kris — August 13, 2010 @ 9:03 am
Comment by Neil vN — August 13, 2010 @ 5:56 pm
Neil, I bought a 70-200mm lens this weekend and first tests show a higher success rate at keep the model sharp (using f/4) while still having a blurry background (shooting at 150-200mm). I also have the feeling that controlling the light from the off-camera speedlight is much easier then with f/1.4-f/2.8). And last but not least, I finally tried TTL instead of doing everything manual and the results were good and I managed to have more shots in the end. I love this. :)
Comment by Kris — August 16, 2010 @ 3:47 am
Great shots. I love reading your posts. I was surprised youre not a big fan of the “R” word on portraits. I was very fond of it because it makes the image look more interesting, but i guess central composition can be great too. Thanks for the tip
Comment by andrew — August 16, 2010 @ 5:23 pm
Gorgeous!! …as always!
Comment by Kathy Marciante Photograhy — September 8, 2010 @ 6:54 am
Hi Neil,
I just love the way you explain and the quality of content. I am very impressed and would try your techniques.
I have a manual flash YN-560, Do you think pictures like these can be achieved with that one or TTL flashes are better ?
Comment by Abhay — July 15, 2011 @ 4:41 am
Comment by Neil vN — July 15, 2011 @ 5:24 am
Hi Neil,
Inspiring pictures and article – thanks for sharing.
I was wondering – ow far do you position yourself from the model and how far away is the off camera flash? i.e., do you decide what zoom you want to use and just adjust your distance till the subject fits the frame or do you start at a certain place and play witht he zoom until it just feels right?
-Ayaz
Comment by Ayaz — May 21, 2012 @ 4:09 pm
Comment by Neil vN — May 21, 2012 @ 10:21 pm
Hi Neil,
I love reading your tutorials. I have an outdoor shoot in a ocuple of days with a very photogenic girl so I’m looking at brushing up on OCF on location, plus just natural light and reflector. Trouble is I’ll be working alone without an assistant and probably won’t have handy surfaces for bouncing on camera flash (trees/open spaces).
How do you work if you don’t have an assistant to hold the OCF/ softbox? I can take light stands but I’m a bit worried it’ll be windy! I have looked but can’t find anything specific in you blog about working alone, but if I’ve missed it please point me in the right direction.
Thanks!
Carmen
Comment by Carmen — May 10, 2013 @ 2:15 pm
Comment by Neil vN — May 15, 2013 @ 5:21 am
Many thanks Neil.
I’ve decided to keep it simple as it’s my first proper shoot in this vein with an aspiring model and I don’t want to muck things up by over-complicating. I may use On-camera flash or perhaps hold it in my hand with CLS. We’re thinking dark and moody so flash and under exposing the sky (which will probably be inclement) may well be a feature.
Comment by Carmen — May 16, 2013 @ 3:46 pm